Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Building my first AR

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by STAGE 2, Feb 26, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. STAGE 2

    STAGE 2 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2003
    Messages:
    899
    Since I'm stuck in the PRK I can't buy one of these out right, so I've decided to build one myself.

    The final result will be a stock 20" A2 AR15, no aimpoints, no rails, no tacticool junk. That said I have 3 questions.

    First, why does the government use a 1:7 twist rate where as most commercial AR's have a 1:9. Which is "better" if there is such a thing and why.

    Second, has anyone dealt with CCMG? I've been looking at their lowers and they seem to be decent.

    Finally, how much of a weight/balance difference is there between the heavy barrel uppers and the regular government profile barrel. I don't mind weight as my normal shooters are of the wood and steel variety, but if puts the rifle at an awkward balance I probably would rather have the stock barrel. Also, will the heavy barrel last longer than the government barrel.
     
  2. funfaler

    funfaler Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    413
    Location:
    kentucky
    The 1:9 twist is for more stability at lighter bullet weights, the 1:7 will allow for weights up to 80+ grain, the former is limited to @65 grains.

    @.75 lbs diff between heavy and M4 style. My thoughts is go lighter, or quicker.

    The barrel wears from the inside out, so the heavy won't last longer.

    No experience with CCMG

    Good luck
     
  3. BamBam-31

    BamBam-31 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,019
    I had a RRA NM heavy barrel 20" upper. VERY nose-heavy (but VERY accurate as well). Sold that, picked up a Colt Vietnam era upper (thinner profile than the government), and the rifle handled infinitely better. Glad I made the switch.

    Haven't dealt with CMMG myself, either, but they've been getting good reviews on Calguns.

    I always think having a flat top upper is preferable to a fixed A2 carry handle configuration. With the flat top, you can get a detachable CH that works just as well, or you can remove it for optics and a BUIS if you so choose. The flexibility/modularity is what AR's are all about, IMHO.
     
  4. nico

    nico Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,212
    Location:
    Baltimore/Laurel, MD
    That's very debatable. Plenty of people have reported getting fine accuracy with 55gr bullets in a 1:7 barrel. 1:9 is more ideal for that weight, but saying that you can't shoot anything below 65gr in a 1:7 barrel is going too far IMO.
     
  5. only1asterisk

    only1asterisk member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,412
    CMMG is good to go.

    David
     
  6. DogBonz

    DogBonz Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,068
    Location:
    NJ
    partially correct

    1:9 was the best compromise that could be found. It will shoot a wide variety of weights well. Although it is not “ideal” for anything under 55gr or over 62g, it still will shoot 40-72 gr bullets very well (depending on barrel quality, of course). The Army now uses a 1:7 for two reasons. The first is to shoot heavy bullets in an effort to increase lethality. The other is to make sure that they are imparting enough spin with the 14” barrels of the M4.
     
  7. shark3-1

    shark3-1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    104
    1:7 was adopted to better stabalize M856 tracer rounds. Either twist will work well. I shoot 55gr. Black hills blue box out of all my 1:7 barrels including the 10.5" barrels, no issues with accuracy or stabilization. You will not have any problem with either if you shoot between 50-70gr projectiles. If you want to shoot heavier than 70gr, a 1:7 would be a better match. If you want to shoot less than 50gr, a 1:9 will be a better match. I've heard good things about CMMG, but haven't owned any of their stuff.
     
  8. Eleven Mike

    Eleven Mike Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,773
    Location:
    Right behind you!!
    Why do you want an AR, are you some kind of terrorist? :p
     
  9. AndyC

    AndyC Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,581
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    hehehe...
     
  10. Eyesac

    Eyesac Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,393
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    What would happen if I shot say a: 77gr bullet out of a 1/9 barrel? Would it just be less stable, tumble at long ranges, be less accurate?

    (sorry to ask questions on you thread)
     
  11. shark3-1

    shark3-1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    104
    Maybe no detrimental effects will occur, or maybe all three things will occur, no two barrels are exactly alike. The odds of the round being properly stabalized will increase if you go to a faster rate (1:8 or 1:7).
     
  12. STAGE 2

    STAGE 2 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2003
    Messages:
    899
    So if I read this right, 1:7 should allow me to shoot a greater variety of ammo with less ill effects.
     
  13. shark3-1

    shark3-1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    104
    Unless you plan on shooting lots of 40gr varmit ammo, you will be fine.
     
  14. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    +1

    I personally tend to like 1/9 the best since they shoot 55gr ammo more accurately than 1/7's and that is what I mostly shoot.

    Most people with 1/9's can shoot the super heavy 77gr rounds just fine too.
     
  15. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    Just finished my CMMG 9mm AR and I have 500 rounds through as of last saturday w/o a single hiccup...I like'em ;)
    Good luck w/ your build :D
     
  16. STAGE 2

    STAGE 2 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2003
    Messages:
    899
    Just out of curosity what is the bullet weight used by the military in their M16's and M4's
     
  17. RobG5538

    RobG5538 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    112
    Location:
    Nor. Cal.
    I am looking to do the same. Where did you guys buy your parts, specifically the lower?

    Not to hi-jack but, is anyone familiar with the RRA complete CAR A4 rifle/upper kit? Seems to be a good deal.




    Rob
     
  18. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    62gr M855 in general (for use with 1/7 twist barrels) although I've heard that some units are getting more 55gr M193.

    M193 is made to be used specifically with the 1/12 twist barrels that are still out there.

    The 77gr Black Hills OTM is getting some usage.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page