Buying my first semi-automatic rifle, I ask your advice.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you have a trusted reasonably experienced local person who could serve as a range buddy/mentor?
Have you shot an AK? If not, try to do so before plunking down cash for one.
Will you be blowing your whole wad on this one gun purchase, or will there be a little $ soon for other toys? If so, and you ever want to shoot for relative accuracy cheaply, then I vote bolt-action .22lr. Your knowledgeable mentor could show you how to scour gun shows, pawn shops, etc for better deals than buying new.

I see AK's as "drop em in the mud, piss on em to clean, and resume firing" kinda guns. I don't see the gains in plunking down for a creme de la creme AK, unless you are an affectionado. That's just one guy's opinion, and you know what they say about opinions.
 
YOU WANT AN AK THAT SHOOTS STRAIGHT....... HAHAHAHAHAHA OK......:banghead:

... just click your heels three time and say... I want my AK to shoot straight...(repeat 3 times in rapid succession)

don't we all! :neener:

Someone used 'AK' and 'good quality' in the same sentence...WHAT??

OK,OK... the best AK's right now are the Arsenal brand-

Take Wile E Coyotes advice......:D
 
so called "Arsenal AK's" arnt always top of the line best check saiga forums out, some people say SAIGA's CONVERTED are way better than some over priced 1500 gun, you can convert it to look like an AK. I went with a SAIGA the price was just right at under $420 AK's WASR 10's are junk, they are liked 550$++ and they used to be under 350 just 1 year ago :( sad.. I would get a SAIGA, convert it. under 200$ to convert, the gun is way better than a AK and converting it to look like a AK is EASY. Dont pay 1000+ for some NAME BRAND decked out AK. You can do this with your Saiga for a CHEAPER PRICE

~[same with computer parts you can pay 1400 for a chip that has EXE 120fps on a game and 700 for a chip that does 117 SO 3 points more for 700$????]~.
 
Get a copy of...

Boston's Gun Bible
 

Attachments

  • bostons_gun_bible_lg.jpg
    bostons_gun_bible_lg.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 4
Any modern military pattern rifle will be easy to strip, clean, and kieep running generally.

I see ARs as being more accurate and more popular. Lots of guys have them and they are very easy to modify if you want to change things in the future. Both ARs I own are 1.25-1.5MOA (inches at 100 yard) rifles.

I've been using my AKs at local rifle matches for the past 18 months or so and have a couple thousand rounds thru them. They are harder to shoot well but are very rugged. Both AKs are 4MOA rifles, which gets me hits on 12" steel plate at 300 yards, if I'm doing my job.

I'd buy a rifle, magazines, ammo and get out and shoot it. Good resources are: training videos, local matches, and classes. BSW
 
I see the name 'Arsenal' getting thrown around alot. If you're going to drop 900-1400 bucks on your first gun, I'd say skip the AK, and grab an AR if possible. Much better ergonomics, less recoil, better sights. The only main differences between a $300 WASR and a $1200 Arsenal is cosmetic; you aren't going to gain anything in terms of accuracy or reliability.

Seriously, you're in the territory for a good AR. Even at the price of buying a pre-converted Saiga from Arsenal, you can grab a basic AR that will out-shoot the nicest AK you may ever find.
 
IMO, no-one as inexperienced as you should get any semi-auto rifle, even a .22LR. Would you want your teenage daughter to learn to drive in a Ferrari?
I learned to shoot on a semiauto, my first gun was a semiauto .223, and I didn't buy my first bolt-action until I had been shooting for at least 15 years. I turned out OK.

The key to learning to shoot well will be, don't start out shooting fast. Shoot very slow, one shot at a time, and pay attention to those basics. Just as with a pistol, focus hard on the front sight, breathe in and let the breath halfway out, hold it, and squeeze the trigger slowly until the shot takes you by surprise (don't hold your breath too long; stop and take another breath if you need to). Hold the trigger back for a second before letting it reset. Don't rush the shots just because you don't have to cycle a bolt. Speed will come, but accuracy first. Take at least 5 seconds per shot, more if you need to; if you can't make yourself go slowly, load the chamber with one round at a time until you get the hang of it.

When shooting from the bench, if the rifle is wobbling, figure out a position in which you can hold it steady. If you don't have a good benchrest, shooting from prone or with your elbows braced against a bench works well. Don't expect 1" groups at 100 yards from an AK, but with decent ammunition, you should be able to manage 2" groups or better at 50 yards and 4" or better at 100, with practice.

Also, AK's don't typically benchrest as easily as some rifles; the barrel/receiver vibration resulting from the heavy gas piston being blasted off the cantilevered gas block can make the rifle jump off a hard rest, resulting in much more scatter than you'd expect, and resting on the magazine is worst of all. I get best results from a bench shooting from a soft support placed as far back under the receiver as possible (i.e., just in front of the magazine), not under the handguard or barrel.

I agree that if you are getting an AK as your first gun, get a good one. I would not recommend trying to convert your own Saiga if you are new to guns. Definitely get one with an optics rail, as you may wish to add a siderail optic at some point. I have a Kobra on my SAR-1 (unmagnified dot-style sight with selectable reticles) and really like it.
 
uhh... that is what we have been trying to tell the guy, if your a guy, if not... sorry! Girls shoot AK's too.

The money versus the accuracy of the famed Arsenal AK.... well it is bad math. :scrutiny:

For the money chips your going to sacrifice, I should think that you might get something with a bit more refinement. :D

Throwing lead down range is fun, but hitting your target with regularity and ease is jim-dandy! :D
 
Thanks for all the useful information everyone. After reading all the replies I think I am going to start with a .22LR rifle instead. I originally intended to get a .22 rifle anyway to hunt small game with. You see, another reason I want to buy guns now is that the crumbling economy and energy shortage have me worried, so in addition to my interest in guns I'm also getting them to prepare for a disaster type scenario where society collapses. Overall I plan to get 4 different guns. I want to get an AK to be my fighting rifle for self-defense, a .22 rifle to hunt small game, a .22 pistol, and finally a very good military-style sniper rifle for hunting large game and also self-defense.

So now I'll just plan to get the .22lr rifle first and the AK second after I get really good at shooting.

Right now I'm looking at either one of the bolt action CZ 452's or an auto-loading Thompson Center R-55 Classic. Which one do you think I should get? Are bolt action rifles always more accurate than auto-loading? Also I notice that the CZ 452's have hammer forged barrels, will this significantly increase the life of the barrel over the R-55 classic's?

@Uncle Mike

Arsenal...hahaha loooong wait on those boys!

We have had all the Arsenal models on order for 6 months now!

Wow, 6 months?! On one of Arsenal's distributors website, RSR group, I product searched for Arsenal brand and several models of Arsenal rifles came up. Should it be assumed that these are all out of stock?

@RP88

Seriously, you're in the territory for a good AR. Even at the price of buying a pre-converted Saiga from Arsenal, you can grab a basic AR that will out-shoot the nicest AK you may ever find.

I know, but I'm planning for a scenario where civilization disintegrates and I heard that the AK is the most reliable and requires a lot less cleaning. I would love to have an AR or one of the other more accurate and ergonomic fighting rifles, but in an environment where you can't just go to the gun store and buy new parts, cleaners, and such then what if the AR breaks somehow? Or has the unreliability and required maintenance of such rifles been over-stated?

Thanks for the shooting tips benEzra and everyone else for all the advice. I'm really overwhelmed at the amount of quality information I received here. I'll probably post again when I get my.22lr with more questions. Maybe I'll even save up and get a Volquartsen.
 
xbox360 wrote:
same with computer parts you can pay 1400 for a chip that has EXE 120fps on a game and 700 for a chip that does 117 SO 3 points more for 700$????

???
 
Which one do you think I should get?
Not really an apples to apples...but I like the CZ, though I don't own either, the CZ is fun to shoot.
Are bolt action rifles always more accurate than auto-loading?
No, but it is from the two you picked. That CZ is a very accurate .22lr, squirrels shake at the sight of it. :D
Also I notice that the CZ 452's have hammer forged barrels, will this significantly increase the life of the barrel over the R-55 classic's?
A hammer forged barrel is certainly more durable, but you would be hard pressed to wear out either. I don't think it is a big factor for that particular platform, but it won't hurt anything.
Maybe I'll even save up and get a Volquartsen.
That's a lot of money to spend, but it would be a way for you to get a very accurate semi, and that sounds like what you want. :)
 
Classic Arms has YUGO M70 under-folders in stock right now for 699.00


YUGOM70AB2.jpg


http://www.classicarms.us/



That is every bit as good as an arsenal. And it is in stock. :)
 
James:
This might appear to be a secondary concern, but how often do you plan to go shoot?
Have you decided how much ammo at $.25(+)/round you would like to have available?

If you are quite sure that your next gun will shoot 7.62x39, then you might already know whether you want to shoot up about $25 per month, or more.
The temptation to fully load a large magazine in a given type of gun can easily result in two months' worth of ammo being converted to noise and smoke within just two weeks or less. Although I also have a Mini 30, SKS, two MNs and now a LE' Jungle Carbine', I normally begin a session with the .22 and as a result use up much less of any large caliber (bigger rounds/'bigger money) after leaning the .22 against a tree.

An SKS on average costs less than an AK, is considered very good value and the standard rifles hold only ten rounds.
Another benefit is that with limited exceptions, the magazine is always attached.
 
An SKS on average costs less than an AK, is considered very good value and the standard rifles hold only ten rounds.
Another benefit is that with limited exceptions, the magazine is always attached.
You can also use 10 (or 5) round magazines with civilian AK's.

Between my wife's Russian SKS and my AK, I much prefer the AK. There are fewer optic choices for an SKS, if you decide to go that route, and the SKS is less tolerant of lack of lubrication. (My wife's got a little dry last year, and got to the point that the bolt had to be closed by hand every other round; it wasn't dirty, just underlubricated.) The AK is also shorter, lighter, easier to store/transport if you have a folding stock model, and is less susceptible to firing pin stick.
 
Wow James...you've gotten a lot of advice...some good...some not so good.

I would agree with the .22lr solution 100% except for one thing...they do not come apart or go back together as easily as centerfire rifles, can be a lot harder to clean and as a result, you can end up with a gun that jams on you a lot. Now there is a lot you can do to prevent that but that kind of thing ends up ruining a gun-buying experience. It doesn't have to but people want their new stuff to work.

With things like AK and AR or SKSs or any other military style semiauto, they are made to take apart, clean, and put back together easily. This will make them reliable and quite frankly it's fun to do.

My buddy just bought a DPMS Sportical .556 which is basically an entry-level AR platform "fun gun" that he just loves because it is so much fun to shoot.
 
Start with the AK, but dont expect to be accurate. For what you will pay for the Arsenel, you can get an AR . Starting with a 22 is OK but you will be looking to upgrade soon.
 
Wow, 6 months?! On one of Arsenal's distributors website, RSR group, I product searched for Arsenal brand and several models of Arsenal rifles came up. Should it be assumed that these are all out of stock?

These may be allocated units. :confused:

And we all know, just because it's on the web site or in the catalog does not necessarily they(the distributer) has them in stock.

Winchester md70's have been on the sites and in the catalogs of some of these distributors since last December, they are, and very limited and model specific, just now becoming available. Dang it!

We'll check with RSR-
 
I would reccomend a .22lr semi-auto the mossberg and savage models can be had for under 125$ ammo is cheap and if you don't like shooting as much as you thought u didn't waste much coin.

And if u do like shooting u could step up to the ak and sks calibers or you could even go the carbine route because they are fun to shoot and great for home defense
 
just now becoming available
True, I handled one the other day...my first opinion (not having shot it) is they are look and feel great and the price tag isn't half bad either. Anyways, back to the original question asked by the OP...I think the Volquartsen would be a good rimfire for you. It is accurate and semi automatic, so it sounds like what you really want. On the other hand you may want to start off with something cheap like a Marlin Model 60, also semi and accurate, just a lot less money.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top