(CA) Couple to keep fighting for their neighborhood

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Couple to keep fighting for their neighborhood
59th Street residents had considered selling their house

Jim Herron Zamora, Chronicle Staff Writer

Friday, April 8, 2005

Against the advice of police, Patrick McCullough has decided to continue his crusade against drug dealers on 59th Street in North Oakland rather than moving to a safer neighborhood.

McCullough, 49, and his wife, Daphne, hung a banner Thursday in their front window -- "I AM NOT MOVING," it said -- after they decided that selling their home did not make economic sense or seem "right or fair."

"My wife and I just don't want to let the drug dealers win," said McCullough, a radio technician who works part time as a lawyer. "That's just a really negative message. I want to stay here and make the neighborhood better."

McCullough, who has routinely chased away drug dealers who congregate near his home, made headlines in February when he shot and wounded a teenager who was among a group of young men McCullough said had assaulted him. Police said McCullough had acted in self-defense after seeing the boy reach for a gun in another youth's waistband, and the district attorney's office decided not to file charges against him or the boy.

McCullough said their decision to stay in the neighborhood was primarily based on "desire to stick it out and succeed" but was also rooted in economic realities. They think it is a bad time to sell their home and move because publicity has scared other buyers away.

The McCulloughs purchased their home through a city program that provides loans to first-time homebuyers. City officials offered them an exemption from a rule that would have required them to pay the city half of their equity if they sold the house.

But the McCulloughs said they would still have to pay the city $35,000 if they moved, making it that much harder to come up with a down payment on another home.

Since they moved into their home in the 500 block of 59th Street in 1994, the McCulloughs have told young men they suspect are selling drugs to go away. They've also frequently called police. Patrick McCullough was assaulted in his yard in 2003, and a 5-pound chunk of concrete was tossed through a window last fall.

On Feb. 18, McCullough shot 16-year-old Melvin McHenry in the arm after, he said, he was surrounded and assaulted in his front yard by several young men who shouted, "Snitch! Snitch!"

McCullough said he fired when he saw Melvin reach into another youth's waistband to pull out what he believed was a gun. But Melvin and his mother, Stacy Hegler, said McCullough had provoked the incident by shouting profanities at a group of young people walking by and then swinging at the teenager.

Melvin's family plans to sue McCullough. Their attorneys, Ivan Golde and Daniel Horowitz, also have asked McCullough's home insurers to pay Hegler $300, 000. Hegler also is seeking a court order to keep McCullough away from her residence and prevent him from keeping a gun in his home.

A judge already has granted McCullough and his family an order requiring Melvin and his mother to stay away from them.

"Patrick McCullough is a danger to this street," Hegler said last week. "We are the victims."

Mayor Jerry Brown visited the McCulloughs, and they have been widely lauded for their efforts to clean up the street. But after February's incident, they contemplated selling their home and moving to another neighborhood.

Real estate agents confirm that potential buyers have backed out of deals to buy nearby homes because of the publicity about 59th Street. Potential renters also have changed their minds about moving in. This comes at a time when two-bedroom homes only a few blocks away list for $500,000 and are receiving multiple offers.

Oakland police Lt. Lawrence Green, who oversees patrols in the area and has posted extra officers on 59th Street, had advised the McCulloughs to move and said he wouldn't consider living there even if it was free.

But Green said Thursday that police supported the McCulloughs and would do "everything we can" to make 59th Street safe.

"I'd rather see the dope dealers move out and not the good citizens," Green said. "It would be a tough loss because it feels like we've made so much progress in those neighborhoods."

Since the banner went up, Daphne McCullough says passing neighbors have flashed "thumbs-up" signals of approval, and police officers have left supportive voice mails.

"Neighbors don't want to see us go," she said. "We're the ones who have been fighting."

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/04/08/BAGFJC4UJC1.DTL

You may remember the earlier story from here...
 
***? they didnt at least file charges against the boy for illegal posession of a weapon? you see... its okay for rapists, murderes and drug dealers to have guns, but law abiding citizens are prosecuted all the time.
 
I saw a segment on last night's TV news; from that short appearance, McCullough looks to be a Citizen in a sea of barbarians.
 
Back a number of years ago in Tacoma, WA, a GI and his family wound up with drug dealers moving in down their street. These slimebags eventually dealt out in the open and pretty much ruined the neighborhood. The soldier tried to get the police to clean up the area but with no real results. The dealers threatened eveyone in the area including this soldier.

So the GI calls a few of his GI buddys and tell them of the problem. His buddys were Rangers and Special Forces types and they offered to help him out by taking out the trash. They did. The soldiers brought enough firepower to take out a whole platoon of drug dealers. There was a firefight and the dealers ran off never to return. The police came when they got reports of shooting but for whatever reason, none of the GI's were arrested or their weapons confiscated.

The neighborhood got quiet again and was a nice place to live.
 
"News flash: Mystery sniper taking out drug dealers in California neighborhood!"

Only in a perfect world...
 
Unfortunately mfree, in this world it would be "Sniper shooting innocent children. Go cower in the corner until until we (the media) have whipped you into a complete antigun frenzy" :banghead:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top