SwordRapier
Member
You're right. Its I nice place to visit, but i wouldn't want to live there. Too restrictive gun laws. Too Expensive.I notice you don't live there............
You're right. Its I nice place to visit, but i wouldn't want to live there. Too restrictive gun laws. Too Expensive.I notice you don't live there............
CA's actual underlying problems are a bit broader in scope than firearms laws.
So anyone have any insight as to my previous comment? Will sport shooting be entirely eliminated after these laws take effect?I'm curious, what will happen to IPSC & IDPA-style competitions?
AMEN! I'd say any member that's ever posted anything truly pro-gun, pro-freedom, or pro-rights has had it happen at least once. As to the California situation, why not move to a free(er) state.I've had several posts of mine regarding California censored by the mods in the past around here, usually just because they were true, but the truth is the truth is the truth, California has descended into a statist abyss and it's not ever going to emerge from it!
ZOOGSTER - "Actually I would say they did happen quickly in just over 10 years. Most of California's modern anti-gun laws started with the 1989 Roberti-Roos assualt weapon list, then the assault weapon by feature and expansion in the early 90s (inspiring the federal version right after), the school zone act of 1,000 feet from schools around the same time (again inspiring the now defunct federal version), magazine capacity limits passed in late 90s begining in 2000. The required approved handgun roster passed around then and took effect January first 2001."
For that, please visit Calguns! You'll hear about it there first.How long until a Heller style case from CA reaches the supreme court?
... California has descended into a statist abyss and it's not ever going to emerge from it!
State says 166,424, .pdf at link. Los Angeles County alone registered 46,609.Compliance rate for registering so called assault weapons is 1% or less. Less than 20,000 were/are registered.