can I use magnum primers in 10 auto?

Status
Not open for further replies.

D51208

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
88
Location
Oswego
Hi,

I accidentally bought some large pistol magnum primers instead of large pistol primers for my 10mm auto, glock. Is it alright to use these in my loads? should I back down a bit?

Load is 180gr hornady xtp
5.4gr of tight group.
 
I would not back that load down 10%. You are already at a Min charge of TG. But then, I wouldn't use an ultra fast powder like TG in my 10MM at all. To small of a safety window for me.
 
"Working back up" serves little purpose. Pressure signs are meaningless in straight walled pistol cartridges. The only way to know what pressures you're running is to abide published loading data. Which includes primer selection.
 
I'd not hesitate to use the magnum primers, but I would not use a powder that fast for loading 10mm. Try something more along the burn rate of AA#7.
 
I'm surprised there's even load data for TG in 10mm.

If you want to make target-oriented rounds in 10mm, consider 231/HP38.
 
What is wrong with TG in a 10mm? Assuming you are not trying to hotrod it to max 10mm velocities, and using it within its intended window, it shouldn't be any different than using TG in a .40.

If you are already at a starting load I wouldn't worry about substituting the magnum primers.
 
Working back up" serves little purpose. Pressure signs are meaningless in straight walled pistol cartridges. The only way to know what pressures you're running is to abide published loading data. Which includes primer selection.

Are you saying that working up straight walled pistol rounds is a waist of time? Are you saying it is safe to start right at the max load? Are you saying published load data is a recipe and must be followed to the letter? Are you saying that the pressures listed in the manuals will hold true in every firearm? For example, if the manual lists a pressure of 30K psi with a specific load, would that 30K psi hold true in every firearm the load is fired in?:confused:
 
During the obama scare, the only primers I could find were Fed SP magnum.
so I used them in all of my handguns that took small primers.

As long as you're NOT at max charge, they're just fine.

_ Good question, though!

Stay safe my friends.
 
Are you saying that working up straight walled pistol rounds is a waist of time? Are you saying it is safe to start right at the max load? Are you saying published load data is a recipe and must be followed to the letter? Are you saying that the pressures listed in the manuals will hold true in every firearm? For example, if the manual lists a pressure of 30K psi with a specific load, would that 30K psi hold true in every firearm the load is fired in?
I'm telling you that pressure signs in straight walled pistol cartridges is an indication of nothing. I'm saying that you can be well below industry maximums and see so-called pressure signs. I'm saying that you can be well over industry maximums and see no pressure signs right up until the gun blows up. I'm saying trust your data and check it with a chronograph.
 
What is wrong with TG in a 10mm? Assuming you are not trying to hotrod it to max 10mm velocities, and using it within its intended window, it shouldn't be any different than using TG in a .40.

If you are already at a starting load I wouldn't worry about substituting the magnum primers.
Well a lot of guys say NO to titegroup in 40 as well :)
 
Well a lot of guys say NO to titegroup in 40 as well

Yup, do the Google on TG in the 40. You may find that TG was the powder used in more 40 KB than all other powders combined.
 
I'm telling you that pressure signs in straight walled pistol cartridges is an indication of nothing. I'm saying that you can be well below industry maximums and see so-called pressure signs. I'm saying that you can be well over industry maximums and see no pressure signs right up until the gun blows up. I'm saying trust your data and check it with a chronograph.

OK, but then explain this.
The only way to know what pressures you're running is to abide published loading data.

How will following published load data "to the letter" tell me what pressures I am running at in my firearm? Is published data an absolute and pressures will be consistent in ALL firearms?
 
Since your charge weight is already at the recommended starting charge weight using a magnum primer with that amount of powder will probably help the load.

BUT, I would not use that powder in the 10mm either. If you like Hodgdon powders give Longshot a try. It's a great powder for the 10mm and 40 S&W.
 
How will following published load data "to the letter" tell me what pressures I am running at in my firearm? Is published data an absolute and pressures will be consistent in ALL firearms?
Published data is not an absolute. Variations between firearms cause variations in pressure. That's why we have a safety margin, to cover those small variations in pressure. As long as your chamber is within spec then pressures will be within acceptable range.
 
Thanks for the information.
I have to admit, I'm sketched out on using TG now :eek: Should I disassemble my other rounds with regular primers? Ive shot about 55 rounds with this recipe, but id rather not have a kaboom and not be covered with the warranty with my pre ban glock? :confused:
 
As long as your load is within published data, just shoot them up.

Don't want to sound cavalier, but KB risk on the internet is way overblown. If you are near the starting load, and have the correct bullet seated remotely correctly, and didn't double charge them, you are fine. Fire away.
 
yes you can use them. i have use mag primers in 9mm and 40 s&w. i did not back off any and the mag primers gave me about 50 fps more over the standard primers when i check them across my chronograph. now i don't run my load at the top end, so 50 fps was no big deal.
 
Published data is not an absolute. Variations between firearms cause variations in pressure. That's why we have a safety margin, to cover those small variations in pressure. As long as your chamber is within spec then pressures will be within acceptable range.

So following published load data will not tell what pressure you are running at, correct. So this statement is false.

The only way to know what pressures you're running is to abide published loading data.
 
Are you a lawyer??? No, the statement is true, within proper context. Obviously, the only way to know exactly what pressures your load is generating would be to have pressure testing equipment. Even then the data will only be true for that set of individual circumstances on that day. Shoot another 500rds and build a little carbon in the chamber and pressures might jump 1000psi (that's just an example, lawyer) the next day. Adjust your dies and pressure may change another few hundred PSI. So no, you never truly know exactly what pressures you're running but as long as your firearm is within spec and you follow your data (checked with a chronograph) then you can be fairly certain you are operating at safe pressures. Like I said, you can see so-called pressure signs and be below safe maximums or see no pressure signs right before the gun blows up. Too unreliable.

The point is to trust and follow your data, not so-called pressure signs. Now if you want to create an argument over semantics you'll have to find somebody else to play with. :rolleyes:
 
"Working back up" serves little purpose. Pressure signs are meaningless in straight walled pistol cartridges. The only way to know what pressures you're running is to abide published loading data. Which includes primer selection.

Not semantics, poor and potentially dangerous advice.

Telling a fellow handloader that "working back up" is a waist of time. Pressure signs are "meaningless". Following published load data can predict pressures. All Bad advice. Semantics, I think not, bad dangerous advice, period.
 
Not semantics, poor and potentially dangerous advice.

Telling a fellow handloader that "working back up" is a waist of time. Pressure signs are "meaningless". Following published load data can predict pressures. All Bad advice. Semantics, I think not, bad dangerous advice, period.
Then I guess you're a smarter guy than John Linebaugh??? I guess he didn't really test guns to destruction and see no pressures signs right up until they blew???

It's bad advice to advise a fellow handloader NOT to deviate from published data? It's bad advice to advise that you may be over safe pressures and see no signs? It's bad advice to advise to always check your data with a chronograph?

Maybe you should try having a two way discussion instead of asking loaded questions??? You could've asked me the source of that information. Yet you chose to play games and ask loaded questions.

PS, It's waste, not waist. If you're gonna go out of your way to insult someone, at least spell it right.
 
It's bad advice to advise a fellow handloader NOT to deviate from published data? It's bad advice to advise that you may be over safe pressures and see no signs? It's bad advice to advise to always check your data with a chronograph?

Now that is all good advice, much better and safer than this.

"Working back up" serves little purpose. Pressure signs are meaningless in straight walled pistol cartridges. The only way to know what pressures you're running is to abide published loading data
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top