Can you reload your revolver faster than a semi?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What IPSC shooters and Jerry Miculek do on the range is not gun fighting. They're engaged in sport...and that's just fine.

Since people often miss stuff in forums: Miculek's record is a neat feat and (probably) the product of many thousands of hours of practice. However, my point here is that people tend to associate such range feats with fighting skill. I'm arguing against that association, rather than the feat itself.

I find the following far more impressive:

2on1.jpg
One thug distracts the citizen while another flanks him

2on1-2.jpg
The distracting thug won't comply with the citizen's commands

2on1-3.jpg
Now it's on! No time to deploy a weapon.

2on1-4.jpg
Full force pummeling

2on1-5.jpg

2on1-6.jpg

2on1-7.jpg

The citizen did an excellent job of staying on his feet and getting the thugs off him. Jerry Miculek, while an awesome sport shooter, won't be able to use his shooting skills in a common street encounter such as this. The combination of skills required for this includes a high level of physical strength, simultaneous monologue engaging the thugs while moving to maintain situational awareness, hand to hand techniques and gun skills. Shooting and reloading skills are not enough.

And, in case you're wondering, this scenario went really, really fast. There is no way a reload of anything would have occurred during the action.

The distance in the final photo between gray shirt thug and the citizen is about six to eight feet. Even if the fight had continued (thugs ran away), those thugs were well within striking distance of the citizen. As we know, shooting gray shirt may not end the fight since terminal ballistics on handguns are weak. The thug could survive long enough to inflict a mortal wound with a knife or other weapon.

If you think you can get your gun out, you're deluding yourself. I personally experienced "gun glued in holster" syndrome several times and I'm pretty damned fast...there's something about the brain getting overwhelmed while getting pummeled, attempting to defend and move that throws even the simplest plan all out of whack.

Note the position of the citizen's weapon. It was pointed at gray shirt's center of mass and would have hit the cardiac triangle. Had he shot, it would have been a sub 1 second shot.

I just don't have a gamer's mentality when it comes to this stuff. After watching several IPSC matches and participating in some IDPA, I came to the conclusion that the skills reinforced by these competitions are incompatible with serious training for fighting. Range tricks, while impressive, don't apply to fighting.
 
Last edited:
What IPSC shooters and Jerry Miculek do on the range is not gun fighting. They're engaged in sport.

I haven't read anything here that suggested otherwise. Nor do I hear competitive shooters or even JM himself say anything of the sort. So, given this, and without simply repeating yourself, what exactly is your point?
 
...what exactly is your point?
The point is that even if a person hones his skills to the point that he's the best in the world in his chosen field, there will always be someone who feels that it's critically necessary to make the point that he's not the best at EVERYTHING and/or that there are situations in which those amazing skills will not be useful.
 
Jerry Miculek and Bob Munden may perform acts that are not
gun fighting
but they certainly posess a lot of gun skills.

I would not want to be the source of a threat that either one thought that lethal force was required to defend against.

Just because they perform does nothing to discount their gun fighting ability, the inverse is true.

Let me explain it this way. As one that teaches women self defense (RADS) I am often impressed with my students, they are outstanding and I am proud of them...but the performer Bruce Lee could kick their butts.
 
Hmmm, I thought Bruce Lee wasn't in a condition these days that would permit him to kick anyone's arse. If we can have movie hero's on our side, I'll take King Kong.

This denouncing the shooting sports and exhibition shooting upper echelon is just silly at it's least and indicative of some serious envy and jealosy at it's worst. These guys are fantastic - and I'd love to just see them in person - to meet them - shake their hands - would be an honor. They are to their sports what Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods, Fran Tarkenton, etc were to their sports.

Now, you want someone 'on your side' in a real gun fight - with an air-cooled .50 - I'll take Audie Murphy, a real decorated hero. In the real world, it will likely be just me - and I hope I can retrieve my 5-shooter fast enough to save my bacon again. It should proove sufficient, capacity-wise... better... my reload is in the car!

As to the original question... no doubt I reload my revolvers faster than my evil-bottom-feeders. Of course, the fact that I no longer own a jam-o-matic may have something to do with that.

What is it that the pictures of a thug throwing around helmetted kids has to do with the OP's question?

Stainz
 
Wow! This really went a different direction. My posted thread title and only point was how fast the ammuniton could be changed in a revolver cylinder. Nothing else.
The quick draw and rapid fire is (to me) in the realm of the very unusual performed only by those extremely dedicated to that sport, not in the real world most of us live in, but the responses were sure interesting.

Latigo
 
Alright, now some of you people are just getting silly with your pop psychology and apparently missed this:

Since people often miss stuff in forums: Miculek's record is a neat feat and (probably) the product of many thousands of hours of practice. However, my point here is that people tend to associate such range feats with fighting skill. I'm arguing against that association, rather than against the feat itself.

It's not jealousy. The man has stated he has shot nearly 1 MILLION rounds in practice over his career. Not many people have that privilege.
 
my point here is that people tend to associate such range feats with fighting skill.

Yet, no one here has made that association, so why the highjack?
 
I can reload a revolver faster then I could a semi auto.

I have found when I try reloading a semi auto I just can't do it quite as fast and I still have to look at the pistol to see what I'm doing which I generally don't with a revolver.

but I'm a revolver guy so I guess that can be expected

on the note of range skill translating into gun fighting generally I wouldn't expect a skilled shooter to hold as well in a defensive situation however, if jerry had that .77 seconds to draw a gun in such a diffensive situation the bg would look like swiss cheese for sure
 
Why would Bob Munden need to reload?

If I could draw and hit two balloons a good distance apart so quickly that you couldn't clearly see my hands move, I don't think that reloading would be the greatest concern I had.:D

I don't think I could reload a revolver as quickly as a semiauto, if I had magazines ready.

However, if I had only a loose pile of ammo, I would probably prefer a DA revolver.

I won't comment on gunfighting. I've never been in a gunfight, so I can't say how I'd do -- and neither can anyone else who hasn't experienced something for real.
 
I love revolvers, but I sure the heck ain't no Jerry Miculek and never will be.

Moon clips help, but I still prefer the semi auto. I have practiced with the auto for IDPA shooting, but still, my reloading is what really slows me. I have no problem with accuracy and speed otherwise, with enough practice.
 
Maybe we could invent an electric or wind-up speed-reloader for single actions.

It could spin the cylinder 1/6 of the rotation, eject the round, stuff in a new one, and start the sequence over. It would be an ugly contraption, but it might sell to the SASS guys if it had enough polished brass on it.:D
 
people tend to associate such range feats with fighting skill. I'm arguing against that association

So you are saying that drawing fast, shooting fast and reloading fast are not gun fighting skills.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top