Caracals anyone ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
W

whetrock

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
397
I was surfing youtube today and found a couple of positive videos regarding this somewhat obscure handgun brand. Call me oblivious but I don't believe I've heard of this comapany and can't find just a whole lot on the net ( I'm pretty limited as far as google-fu goes) regarding these pistols and was curious if anyone on this sight had any first hand experience with them. They are manufatured in the U.A.E. which I found a bit odd:scrutiny:. Also I could be mislead but they look like quality to me and kinda Glock esque.
 
Also I could be mislead but they look like quality to me and kinda Glock esque.
Click to expand...
The designer of the Caracal, Wilhelm Bubits, also did at least some of the design work on the Glock.
 
Yes he did. He was very open about the respective designs when I spoke with him...somewhat to the alarm of the company president who was also there.

Bubits considers the Caracal a product improvement over the Austrian pistol. And he said this as no longer being a Caracal employee
 
i ordered 1... will report when it's released...

-----

here's what i posted in an earlier thread:

-----

my LGS allowed me to shoot their shelf unit... i fired 50 rounds on the 2-dot sight version and quick sight (QS) version...

in my very unprofessional hands, it seemed like the pistols tracked their own shots... at 15m, 5-shot groups fired in rapid succession were within 3in diameter circles... likely due to the smooooooooth trigger pull and minimal flip... of course, if i badly shot the 1st round, the other 4 would be equally bad...

shot it against the 24/7 G2 and a Tanfolgio/Armscor MAPP1... i'd have to say i was getting the opposite results from what i expected... i was able to find targets faster with the G2 than either caracal... but the caracals were more consistent and faster in follow up shots...

the MAPP1 is really nice (cheapest of the bunch by a fair margin too) but it just didn't float my boat... i'd have to say the DA pull is the worst of the bunch but SA was sweet... this resulted in 1 shot way off followed by 4 consistent shots (though less consisten than the G2)... if i didn't have a thing of firing from DA for the 1st shot, i'd likely enjoy it...

between the caracals, the QS was quicker at finding targets than the 2-dot system... the QS looks like it'll take some range time to get used to... the difference in target acquisition between the G2 and QS is minimal but noticeable... maybe i just got used to the G2 over the last weeks...

i just couldn't come to terms with the 2-dot version... i couldn't find the target which seemed to be covered by both front and rear sights (no gap between the front sight box and the walls of the rear sight)... i was consistently off target by several inches...

if i were forced to use a pistol against an attacker right now, i'd still say the G2 would be my pick... i'm likely to find the target sooner and fire with it... the slick trigger of the QS also needs serious getting used to... with no safeties and what feels like a light SA pull every time, the QS seems scary to carry... time will tell if the QS will change my mind...
 
I've shot one. It was interesting, but I would rather have a Glock or M&P.

R
 
I handled one at a gunshop and thought they were about $200 overpriced. Terrible ergos, loose fit, cheap feeling.
You can buy a Springfield XD Essential package for a little less and to say the XD is superior is an understatement. IMHO.
 
TJx said:
I handled one at a gunshop and thought they were about $200 overpriced. Terrible ergos, loose fit, cheap feeling.
You can buy a Springfield XD Essential package for a little less and to say the XD is superior is an understatement. IMHO.
Click to expand...
It sounds like you were shown a Keltec. The two I examined at LGS were first rate products. The fit, finish and ergonomics were at top of polymer gun heap.
 
TJx said:
I handled one at a gunshop and thought they were about $200 overpriced. Terrible ergos, loose fit, cheap feeling.
You can buy a Springfield XD Essential package for a little less and to say the XD is superior is an understatement. IMHO.
Click to expand...
the unit must've issues...

the ones i fired had excellent fit and finish, fired well and felt great (F QS = 50 rds, F SS = 50 rds, C SS 100 rds)... so much so, i ordered the F QS right there and then...

the last few weeks, i've been in search of a 9mm pistol... tried the glock 17 (stock and modded), glock 19 (stock and modded), hs9 (springfield xd in the US), sti gp6, sti gp6c, armscor mapp1 (tanfoglio force 99 polymer), armscor map1 (tanfoglio force 99), taurus 24/7 g2 (my wife liked and got this), bersa thunder pro 9, cz shadow, armscor 1911-based 9mm and a few others...

to give each a fair shake, i shot between 50 to 100 rounds for each pistol firing from 5m, 10m, 15m and 20m (where possible)... took time to read the manual and learn the controls and handling of each... then tried to operate all controls the way i'd do in a shooting situation...

of all the pistols i tried, the caracal F QS was the only 1 that had me wanting to take it home from the 1st time i fired it...
 
I have handled several of them. It appears to be a quality firearm. All of the ones that I was able to inspect were fitted properly. The trigger pull smooth with a crisp break. Trigger reset was glock-esque. The pistol felt good in the hand, but not great. The grip angle is closer to the Steyr than to the Glock. I understand that there are two versions of sights, a standard and a quick sight , aka QS. The front sight is dovetailed in and the rear sight appeared to be part of the slide plate. All of the ones that I have seen in my area have been priced close to $700.

My Opinion: While I like the pistol, I won't be buying one. The pistol is smooth with a tight lock up but I feel they are over priced. I do not care for the rear sight design. It limits you to what sights one can get for the pistol. The company and the design are both new, so it will take time to get them properly vetted. When I disassembled the Caracal F model and was looking on the under side of the slide, I couldn't help but feel that some of the parts looked a bit fragile. That's just me though. The grip angle is more swept than the Glock, so some will have issues with that.

The last thing that sort of throws me off is that they backed out of producing them in the U.S.A. . Carcal had a facility, a manager, and a materials supplier all lined up. For some reason, they back out and decided that they were going to produce them in the U.A.E. instead. Unsure as to why they made this decision, but I have been told that this is the reason that there was a lull in the availability of the caracal pistols in the U.S. during that time (last 6-8 months). This information, I guarantee, is not 100% accurate, but it was heard from a reliable source. Still doesn't make it gospel, IMO.

Regardless, I wish them the best of luck. I enjoy competition and innovation in the Firearms industry. Just seems like the same old stuff keeps coming out....nothing truly revolutionary in a while ,just everyone reinventing the wheel.
 
Sorry guys for starting a whole new thread on a topic that was discussed just yesterday. I don't look at the Autoloader sub forum too often so I guess I missed it. Also I'm really digging these pistols overall and at the moment lack a full sized 9mm in my collection so I might be considering one of these to fill the gap. Also 9mmepiphany that was an excellent and helpful review that really shed a bit of light for me on the Caracal pistol internaly the guide rod, barrel, and slide look pretty Glock to me but the lower receiver/frame (on the inside) looks a little bit different, but still I'm attracted to the gun and if spare Mags are readily available I might have found a decent alternative to the Glock 19 ( aside for the M&P 9 and XD) but still I might go the Glock route for the sake of aftermarket parts and what not, with that being said if the Caracal trigger is as good as they say it may be good to go from the factory and might not need any aftermarket "stuff".
 
Brought one home last week via Gallery of Guns. Excellent ergonomics, high quality, and a nice shooter. I really like the quick sight system. This is a keeper for me!
 
I bought a Caracal F last week. For me, the ergonomics are much better than the Glock (no finger grooves), the trigger much better than the M&P, recoil is much less than the XD, and the price much less than the PPQ.

After 200 rounds last Tuesday, I think I'll black out the rear white dot.


YMMV
 
Handled one yesterday. It points VERY high for me.

Don't like the rear sight design, either. It may have potential, but it's in desperate need of interchangeable backstraps. Then again, so is Glock.
 
My question is where do they fit in? With Glock, S&W, Ruger, Springfied and FNusa doing all these striker fired polymers is the Caracal just around to be different? Do they offer anything you can't already get from a proven design with an aftearket following like the others?
 
I don't believe there is anything "revolutionary" about the Caracal. The pistol's designer, Wilhelm Bubitz worked for Glock, and designed the Steyr M series, this is a well designed pistol. I do believe they have, in many respects, evolved/resolved past the shortcomings of the current market leaders.

The pistol has passed the most rigorous NATO and German Federal Police trials.

Now, the rest is marketing i.e. improving US distribution (they have a new importer and Lipsey's is wholesaling) , getting test pistols out to the writers, blue guns to the holster makers (sending holsters with T&E guns is a big plus), placing good print and web ads, shoot sponsorships, etc.

IMHO, if you are a diehard fan for another platform and have a shoebox full of mags and milk crate overflowing with holsters, I doubt you will abandon what you have. However, if you're like me, and you don't have that bond, and want a reliable, very shootable, 9mm polymer pistol the Caracal is worth a look.

$0.02

Jim
 
I posted a review several months ago. I own both the full sized and C (compact) models.

I've put them through some pretty extensive testing at this point. Here's the review.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnpprZgirKs

So far I've found the pistols to be of good quality. I've been having some problems with the C staying locked open on the last shot fired with WWB and Federal bulk pack ammo. Not a major concern, but it is troublesome.
 
I've been having some problems with the C staying locked open on the last shot fired with WWB and Federal bulk pack ammo. Not a major concern, but it is troublesome.
Click to expand...

You'll find that is the case with most military/euro guns. The cheap ammo here seems to be just that tad bit too anemic to cycle a "combat pistol."
For a test on that one, try some S&B and see if that does it too. If it doesn't it really is just low powered ammo.
 
Handled one yesterday. It points VERY high for me.
Click to expand...

I have become convinced that the tendency to point high is by design for both the Glock and the Caracal.

No gun will fit every hand and pointing high is better than pointing low since pointing high still allows the shooter to see the front sight.

--------------------

Overall the Caracal is a fantastic handling and shooting pistol. I continue to be impressed with mine!
 
No gun will fit every hand [...]
Click to expand...

Not to mention that "fitting the hand" is purely a learned behavior to hold the hand. Nobody came out of the womb holding a 1911. Everyone learned. It's not exactly a stretch to think that *le gasp* not everyone learns the same gun. 8)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

P
  • Locked
Caracal F Review
Replies
3
Views
702
plouffedaddy
P
Kyle S.
  • Locked
Taurus in 2021
2 3
Replies
51
Views
3K
kidneyboy
kidneyboy
C-grunt
  • Locked
Changing thumb safety on 1911...need instructions
Replies
2
Views
471
chieftain
C
W
  • Locked
Looking for a flashlight...
Replies
10
Views
886
Bigtime Sexy
B
C
  • Locked
How does the SP01 Phantom stack up against a Glock 17?
Replies
13
Views
3K
msiley
M
Back
Top