Carrying while you hunt?

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I bow hunt I often am alone and going ultralight camping at the same time were I might go 2 or 3 days in a 10 or 15 mile loop.I find that the pistol does not ride well under the wide belt of my backpack so its usually inside the pack. How do the rest of you carry when you have a wide heavy support belt from a back or fanny pack? My usual pistol is med. sz. glock in 40 or 357 with 1 fullsize backup mag in fobus paddle holster. I have gone to carrying with the holster clipped to the pack belt at times but found that I lost the feel of having the gun directly on my person and now use a landyard from Blackhawk
 
For Me the only time it makes sense is when grouse and bear seasons overlap. If your rifle won't do it a handgun is a poor substitute. I carry a lot because it's a habit of mine but not for hunting purposes....Essex
 
Heck Yea!

I carry a concealed gun even when hunting with a pistol. You never know what may happen in the woods. You are alone and someone with a rifle could get the drop on you and rob you. Once they've got your stuff (and your primary weapon), then what?
I carry everywhere but work, the Air Force frowns on you having a gun on duty, or even on base!
 
see im thinking of using a tactical vest with a holster that fits on your stomach or a drop leg rig. reason being i will have to have a heavy pack to be ready for sudden weather changes and could have to hike for a while. so on my hip really aint an option.
 
"I don't carry anything other than a rifle when I hunt. Why? The PA Game Commission says I 'aint allowed.

Good thing there were no game wardens in the area today because I apparently 'aint allowed to target shoot during deer season either."

this is news to me...

it was my understanding that if you acquire a "Sportsman's Permit" from your local courthouse that you were permitted to carry a revolver or single-shot handgun while hunting & trapping; you must have a photo ID & current hunting license and it costs only a few $$$

even though I have a CCW that is declared for 'self defense' I obtained a Sportsman's Permit to keep my self out of hot water with PGC deputies

if your statement pertains to using a semiatuomatic handgun, then you are correct...no semiautomatic pistols in the woods while hunting & trapping

as far as the 2nd part of your statement, I'd say do your target blasting at a sanctioned range if you must do it during hunting season...

BTW: yes I do carry...in the past I have carried a 6" barreled .357 magnum revolver; this year I carried a 4" barreled .357 magnum revolver
 
Depends on where and what I'm hunting. Out here in Aleutian Hell or up on the Yukon, I normally don't have fighting pistol with me. If it's a day trip, I'm more likely to be carrying a .22. If it's an overnighter or longer, I bring a .44 along as a tent gun which is usually left in my sleeping bag.
 
Try to shoot a rattle snake 10 feet away with a scoped rifle :)
A pistol can be handy.
 
mountain lion attack in gun free paradise

This was just posted in the general forum. Thought it was applicable here too.

java

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercu...s/16546900.htm

Mountain lion attacks man in Humboldt state park
LISA LEFF
Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO - State wildlife officials on Thursday credited a 65-year-old Fortuna woman with saving her 70-year-old husband's life by clubbing a mountain lion that had his head gripped in its jaws until the animal let go.

Jim and Nell Hamm, who will celebrate their 50th wedding anniversary on Feb. 9, were hiking in Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park on the far North Coast when he was attacked by a single lion, Supervising Ranger Maury Morningstar said.

"He didn't scream. It was a different, horrible plea for help, and I turned around and by then the cat had wrestled Jim to the ground," Nell Hamm said in an interview from the hospital where her husband was recovering from a torn scalp, puncture wounds and other injuries.

Game wardens, who closed the park and released hounds to track the mountain lion, shot and killed a pair found near the trail where the attack happened.

One lion, a female, was shot with a rifle Wednesday night. The other, a male, was killed Thursday morning, said Fish and Game Warden Rick Banko. Their carcasses were flown to a state forensics lab in Rancho Cordova to determine if either animal mauled the man, he said.

Although she and her husband are avid hikers and experienced in the outdoors, neither of them had seen a mountain lion before Jim Hamm found himself on the ground trying to fight one off, his wife said. Nell Hamm said she grabbed a four-inch wide log and beat the animal with it, but it wouldn't relinquish its hold on her husband's head.

"Jim was talking to me all through this, and he said, 'I've got a pen in my pocket and get the pen and jab him in the eye,'" she said. "So I got the pen and tried to put it in his eye, but it didn't want to go in as easy as I thought it would."

When the pen bent and became useless, Nell Hamm went back to using the log. The lion eventually let go and with blood on its snout stood staring at the woman, who screamed and waved her wooden weapon until the animal slowly walked away.

"She saved his life, there is no doubt about it," said Steve Martarano, a spokesman for the Department of Fish and Game.

Hamm said she was scared to leave her dazed, bleeding husband alone, so the couple walked a quarter-mile to a trail head, where she gathered branches to protect them if more lions came around. They waited there - Hamm does not know for how long - until a ranger came by and summoned help.

"My concern was to get Jim out of there," she said. "I told him, 'Get up, get up, walk,' and he did."

Jim Hamm, whose lips had to be stitched back together, underwent surgery for lacerations on his head and body at Mad River Community Hospital in Arcata. He was in fair condition on Thursday, and told his wife he plans to make the trip to New Zealand they planned for their Golden anniversary, she said.

Hamm said she and her husband want to use their experience to warn people never to hike in the backcountry alone. Park rangers told them that if they had not been together, Jim Hamm probably would not have survived the attacked.

"I feel that Jim and I fought for his life," she said. "We fought harder than we ever have to save his life, and we fought together."

Based on their weight of between 70 and 100 pounds, officials think the lions were relatively young.

The incident about 320 miles north of San Francisco was the 16th mountain lion attack reported to the state since 1890. It was the first attack since three people were injured, one of them fatally, in separate incidents in Orange and Tulare counties in 2004, Martarano said.

Since 1990, the 4,000 to 6,000 mountain lions estimated to be in California have been protected from hunting, although residents can get special permits to shoot a lion if it is perceived as a danger to people, pets or livestock.

Sightings of the animals have increased in the past decade as housing has spread into their habitat, but attacks are relatively rare since mountain lions tend to be wary of people, said Karen Kovacs, a senior wildlife biologist with the Department of Fish and Game.

"For the most part, their natural inclination is to go the other way when humans are around," Kovacs said. "This was atypical because this person was with somebody. Usually they attack someone who is alone."

The park was reopened to the public Thursday after the second lion was killed, Banko said.
 
Absolutely!

When I was whitetail hunting, and even when pheasant hunting. I'm not concerned about the animals; I'm concerns about the "animals". The rifle/shotgun is for animals; the concealed pistol is for violent "animals".

Bare in mind, many times I am hunting with a single-shot. In such cases, an autoload pistol is by no means a bad idea.

Doc2005
 
I often carry while hunting if it is a short walk. For my several mile ventures, the extra gun is too much weight. Every ounce counts.
In Utah, with a CCW permit, you can even carry while Bow Hunting or the Muzzleloader hunt.
 
I always carry when I hunt, if not on a military base where it's disallowed. Comforting to have getting in/out of the truck prior to loading the long gun. Nice when launching the boat at remote boat ramps. Nice during bow season in bear country. Nice to have while lowering raising the unloaded rifle to/from the tree stand. I carry a Kimber 45 or Ruger SP 101 in a military style shoulder rig.
 
Easier answer: I don't carry when I'm in the shower . . . but a friend is never far away . . .

Said she: "Guns scare me." Said me: "People scare me."
 
ALWAYS

Stuff happens in the woods just like it does in the city. Only wild animals can be much harder to deter than common criminals. I carry my SA-XD .45 Tac religiously and feel naked without it.
 
Whether you carry a pistol or not largely depends on your personal situation. Sometimes when I read boards like this, I really think, based upon the posters' stances, that everyone thinks that everyone else's situations are EXACTLY like thiers.

Even on this thread, there are people from numerous parts of the country, with different wildlife, different populations, different land situations. On this thread there are people where hunting isn't a daily thing but rather it is an extended trip.

For all of those reasons carrying a sidearm may make perfectly good reason for one poster and be completely unnecessary for another one. There is no correct answer that fits everyone.

For me, hunting isn't a trip I plan for weeks. It is something I do if I can get my work done at the office quick enough to sneek out during the season. I may hunt 5 days in a week for a few hours a day, or I may only get to go a few times in a season. Incidently, where I hunt is only a couple miles from my home. No real need for me to carry SHTF supplies with me--yet I do understand why many would need those.

That said, I DO carry a sidearm most days. I do trust my accuracy, but I am prepared to put an animal out of its misery if I every do make a poor shot. I'd much rather do that at point-blank range with a 9mm rather than a 308.

A better discussion would be qualifying the nature of the hunting with carrying or not carrying. Going on a month-long hunt lead by a guide is a LOT different than grabbing a rifle, driving a few miles from home and being gone literally 2.5 hours.


All the best!

John
 
IMO, you use a pistol to fight your way to a battle rifle. Not a hunting rifle. Almost anyone that's ever had a deer break cover nearby when all you've got is a bolt with a 3-9x scope will tell you it's not going to be an easy shot. I bought a short lever action just for that purpose. There's really no "do all" gun. If I hit something standing still with a pistol at 200 yards, or something moving quickly with a scoped rifle at 10 yards, I'd say luck was on my side in either case (which is why I just don't take those shots). Maybe you're better, but I see nothing unwise about carrying a pistol in the field, besides, of course, the state laws that are at odds with doing so. In that sense, I don't have the proverbial "dung hits the propeller" gun, because every gun out there - in fact, virtually every product in existence - is a compromise best suited to particular circumstances.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top