A few months ago, someone said that the 7.62x54r Mosin-Nagant probably had many more kills attributable to it than the 8mm Mauser. This got me thinking...
While there is no truly accurate way of estimating overall kills attributable to any one cartridge or rifle, has there been any research into the most "lethal" firearm/cartridge?
I half-assed an estimation based on my knowledge of 19th and 20th century conflicts, and I figured on the 8mm Mauser having caused the most deaths. From there it seems hazy. .303 British undoubtedly caused millions of deaths, as did the 7.62x54r and more recently the 7.62x39 and 5.56. Anyone familiar with any studies into this issue? Feel free to share your guestimations.
I don't mean to sound... overly morbid, just curious. It is a depressing subject though. Cheers
Ross
While there is no truly accurate way of estimating overall kills attributable to any one cartridge or rifle, has there been any research into the most "lethal" firearm/cartridge?
I half-assed an estimation based on my knowledge of 19th and 20th century conflicts, and I figured on the 8mm Mauser having caused the most deaths. From there it seems hazy. .303 British undoubtedly caused millions of deaths, as did the 7.62x54r and more recently the 7.62x39 and 5.56. Anyone familiar with any studies into this issue? Feel free to share your guestimations.
I don't mean to sound... overly morbid, just curious. It is a depressing subject though. Cheers
Ross