Reloadron
Contributing Member
The "need" depends on how we look at the purpose of the gauge. As I quoted earlier from L. E. Wilson the gauges (this type) is only used to measure two features, the case headspace and the case length. The gauges do that just fine.But there is a need isn't there? Isn't that the whole purpose of the guage? I bulged some 223 by over crimping. This bulge was very small and hard to notice. If I had a gauge made with a chamber reamer, I could've spotted the problem. Pistol cases don't seem as critical to this or as subject to the bulging. I dunno maybe I'm putting too much thought into this. If it's a tube with a hole drilled in it I'm going to feel a bit silly for spending the $ on them.
Using true chamber reamers to cut gauges would prove an expensive proposition. They want to make a gauge that exceeds maximum allowable cartridge diameter so the gauge is useable over a wide range of cases for its intended use and again that use is only to measure two features.
There are bench rest and match shooters who will use a precision reamer to cut a chamber and then use that same reamer to cut a gauge and die. Just a matter of how precise or OCD we want to get about making a gauge. The average hand loader has no need to go to this extreme.
Anyway, when used correctly gauges like the case length and case headspace gauges we are discussing do fine for their intended use. No, they won't catch a slightly buckled shoulder. A good visual inspection should and if we push a little metal out the headspace dimension should come up a little short. As it pertains to bottle neck rifle like 223 or 308.
Ron