Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
Most manufacturers recommend reduced loads when choosing cast lead over FMJ type bullets.
THis is because the lead bullet is softer and needs less force to propel it thorugh the barrel, and also to keep velocities down to prevent leading the barrel.
In my experience if you are using a hard alloy (Brinell 21 or so, typically 90/8/2 alloy) you won't have leading problems at normal mid-range FMJ loads. If you can scratch the lead slug with your fingernail it is not hard enough IMHO.
The rule of thumb is drop the charge 10% for lead over a comparable FMJ bullet. This is a good place to start, and you can increase your loads slowly and see if you get leading.
I load hardcast bullets at 100% of FMJ load data and do not get significant leading. Your mileage may vary.
evan is right. The only problem you might have is leading at the higher velocities. Many load books lead loads stop at velocities which are not prone to leading, and not pressure like they do with jacketed.
something as light as 95 g would normally be used in .380 casings. You might want to step up to a heavier bullet like 115g. Not sure why you would want to use it in a nine.
I ran into this problem a few months ago when I was given a few thousand 95gr lead bullets and tried to load them for my 9mm. My solution was to buy a .380.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.