Charter Arms .32H&R first impressions

Status
Not open for further replies.

AZAndy

Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
2,066
Location
Prescott, AZ, USA
Before I start, I should mention that I've never owned or even examined a Charter Arms revolver before. Thus, some of the stuff I have to say will already be well-known to CA fans. I'd always been a bit leery of the brand because of the low price and a few disparaging comments on this and other sites, so I never even asked to see one at a gun shop. Since the bad stuff I'd read and heard about Taurus turned out to be true with my first one of those, I figured I'd just stay away.

And then the .32 H&R Fans Rejoice thread happened. It mentioned that CA was announcing a 7-shot .32 Magnum, and that got my interest. I have an inexplicable love for .32 Long and have been wanting to do some hot-ish loads in that chambering, so I had the idea of the new revolver percolating in the back of my mind. As I kept an eye on the thread, some troubles cropped up here and there with new adopters, so I decided to wait a bit.

Something reminded me a few days ago of my slumbering interest, so I ordered one through Davidson's last Saturday. It arrived at the shop this morning, so here it is:
caprol.jpg capror.jpg
caprocyl.jpg

Details: Postal scale says this is 21 ounces unloaded. DA is 11 pounds, SA is 5. Cylinder gap is .004". 3" barrel, 7 round capacity, nitride finish. MSRP is $438, and through Davidson's and a local shop it was $377.86 (not including sales tax.) Fiber optic front, channel and slot rear.

I'll get a range report up tomorrow, but without having fired it, I can make a few observations.

-- The trigger is really pretty good. A little stacking at the end of the travel, but fairly even and smooth. The DA isn't any stiffer than new S&W J-Frames I've bought. The face of the trigger is grooved, which I'm not a fan of, but the ridges are smooth enough that it doesn't give me any trouble. The face is wide enough to be quite comfortable, to me.

-- Fitting is much better than I expected after having read some "this is junk" comments about CA. Lockup is quite tight, no endshake, and no more wobble than a new S&W or Ruger would have. No gaps in the grip.

--Bore looks good, with nice sharp-edged rifling. An even number of lands (8), so if I have to slug it, it'll be easy.

-- Finish isn't 100% perfect, as there's a little wear streak at the top of the yoke and a tiny burr there, but that'll smooth off in ten seconds with an Arkansas stone. I don't see any other flaws. Whether the finish can stand up to holster wear remains to be seen. No sharp spots with a well-done rounding of edges.

-- The grip: when I looked at photos of this gun here and there, I was pretty sure that the grip would have to go. I was wrong. I thought the "shelf" at the top would make my usual folded-thumb grip uncomfortable, but it doesn't stick out as much as the photos make it seem. It's slender enough for my medium-sized hands, with a nice palm swell for a solid feel in the hand. The finger contours fit my hand okay, though if you have really skinny or heavy fingers, they might not for you.

-- CA fans already know this, but I was pleased to see that the cylinder rotates inward, Colt-style. Not that it makes a big difference, but it's a nice touch.

Overall, I'm impressed with this fellow, especially at this price. I didn't expect such a nice solid feel, and crisp action, from a bargain revolver. I think it looks good; the full underlug is nice, as is the curve below the muzzle.

I already had a couple of holsters that fit it just fine; one was for a Kimber K6 and the other for a Ruger SP101. That should give you an idea of the frame size if you haven't encountered this size Charter before.
 
Last edited:
Looking forward to a range report. I ordered one when they first came out and then cancelled almost right away when initial reports weren't so good.
 
I wanted one for a while but the POA and POI differences were just too much from everything I've read. I went with the LCR .327
 
I have a undercover that’s beat to hell. I have considered replacing the bits to make it a 32. I’m not exactly sure how hard of a swap that is for a charter. I’m not planning to do it right away though so I have time to investigate and decide. Let us know how it shoots.
 
I wanted one for a while but the POA and POI differences were just too much from everything I've read. I went with the LCR .327
Yes, I'm worried about that too. This one doesn't seem to have as huge a ridge where the barrel meets the frame as the photos of the problem guns show, but I'll know for sure tomorrow.
 
looks good and congrats on it . I've been tempted but I dont need any more calibers. reserve the right to change my mind though.;)

try to bench rest if ya can. I had to send a charter back for sight issue, but came back decent enough with new barrel. this company seems to care about quality, least my experience with them.
 
Looks nice. I've been wanting something chambered in 32 h&r to experiment with, but the 357 Blackhawk I've (hopefully) got coming in the next 3-4 weeks will have to fill that void for now.
 
Please keep us posted, I'll order one if it shoots where it is aimed.
Will do! Going to load some test Magnums early tomorrow, and already have standard and hot .32 Longs to try out. And a 20-round box of commercial stuff. I should have something posted in the afternoon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jhb
I'm interested to hear how the POA/POI goes since this looks like a newer production model. If it's a lot closer, that's a good sign that Charter is on the right track, but if not I won't be surprised.
 
Watching... Cautiously hopeful. I kinda want one...

Usually that means I'll probably buy one. :D
Please keep us posted, I'll order one if it shoots where it is aimed.
I'm interested to hear how the POA/POI goes since this looks like a newer production model. If it's a lot closer, that's a good sign that Charter is on the right track, but if not I won't be surprised.
Report is here.
The short version: fuhgeddaboudit. 6.5" low, almost 2" left at ten yards with commercial Magnum ammunition.
 
Last edited:
Report is here.
The short version: fuhgeddaboudit. 6.5" low, almost 2" left with commercial Magnum ammunition.
I’ve been too apathetic to call them and send mine back again. It’s been there twice and they didn’t make it right.
 
I’ve been too apathetic to call them and send mine back again. It’s been there twice and they didn’t make it right.
Uh-oh. Thanks for letting me know. I'd better start thinking some thoughts about how to address it myself if they can't straighten it out. It would be a really interesting filing job!
 
Report is here.
The short version: fuhgeddaboudit. 6.5" low, almost 2" left with commercial Magnum ammunition.

I have a 20th century Pathfinder .22 that belonged to my Uncle. It has adjustable sights and the rear sight is all the way right and down. They seem not to have ever put their barrels on straight.
 
Im working on a deal to git a Charter Professional in 357 Mag .. with black nitride finish...
Im a Charter fan as most of you know ... simple made revolvers .. less parts than others .. light for size ...
This will be my first XL frame Charter.. size wise should be bout size of a Rossi 357 ... but lighter ...
like most Charters .. light for size ..
 
If we start hearing that the .357 Professionals do shoot to POA due to using heavier bullets then my suspicions will be correct that Charter designed the barrel/shroud for the .357, but what doesn't make sense at that point is why they would release the Professional in .32 Mag first with an oversize barrel shroud other than they decided to make the buyers of those .32 Professionals be unpaid testers to see how they would perform function wise.

At this point nearly a year after release for the issue to not be corrected tells me that Charter has no intentions of correcting it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top