Cheapest handgun you would consider using

Status
Not open for further replies.
I gave a dealer $100 or a Pa-63/AP-9 in .380 once. It's a solid little pistol.

The police trade model 10's available at Bud's and others are no doubt more reliable and as what's available NOW, I'd recommend one of those.
 
The cheapest guns I would trust my life to would be used S&W M10s and M64s. These guns have to be the best deal in the firearms universe: cheap, reliable, accurate, no magazines or accessories needed, and chambered in a common round. Around here you can usually find cop surplus revolvers for a little over $200, sometimes a little under $200 if you are lucky.
 
Cheapest at all, or cheapest I own?

I do have a CZ vz.52 that's been reliable since I changed the spring, but it wouldn't be my first choice. Lots of penetration, and slow mag changes.
 
Probably a KT PF-9 for $215 on CtD.....or P3AT

Cheapest gun I ever shot was a Davis P-32 my buddy bought from his uncle for $30....it actually shot pretty well. No jams, pretty accurate (for what it is and the sights) but can't get over how cheap that zinc potmetal stuff is and would never "trust it."
 
Guns and their accessories are cheap, life and limb are priceless. In the following order:
1. Refurbished Glock
2 EAA Witness steel frame
3. Used XD
4. RIA 1911
5. WAlther P38
6. Arcus 9mm
7.Used CZ75
8. USed S&W 5906
9. CZ82
10.EAA 9mm Tokarev
11. Keltec p-11
12. Hi-POint .45
13. A sword
14. A sledgehammer
15. Harsh Language
16. Screaming
17. A trident
18. A Webley 1932
19. Any Cobra firearm
 
I agree life and limb are pricesless, but this question for me was along the lines of, if you were impoverished, had extremely small amounts of spare money, what would you get? One of the arguments for "Saturday Night Specials" (and I really dislike that term for inexpensive sidearms) is that eveyone, even the poor, have the right to defend themselves.
 
Glock, used at under $400 if it has to be abargin gun. Why settle for anything else? Parts are cheap and easy to get and function is about as good as it gets.

It always amazes me that people try and cheap out on something that may save their life. I guess some peoples lives are only worth a $150 High Point in their mind.
 
The cheapest handgun I would bet my life on is my Jennings J-22. It's extremely reliable and it feels great in my hand. After about four magazines, I start getting malfunctions, but a quick cleaning with a toothbrush makes it reliable again. I'd have no problem carrying it for defense.

Jennings.gif
 
Currently, my cheapest and only handgun was purchased for $250, a 2nd Gen S&W auto.

Prior to that, it was my $169 Hi Point .45

Low cost does not equal low reliability, nor does high cost equal high reliability.
 
Right you are, bernie. But I don't think everyone is connected with the meaning of the meaning of the words "limited means"..:)
 
Last edited:
I got my Pa-63 for 175 a while back.
I had my 75 dollar Nagant which I kept in the glove box and carried as my woods gun.
I traded my Turkish Mauser (which I'd gotten in a trade for an H&R SS 12ga worth 80) for a Taurus 83.
Pocket carried my 125 dollar Spanish copy of a S&W in .38 S&W.
I keep a 100 dollar Iver Johnson Sealed Target 8 tucked away in my car.
And, I stuff my 340 dollar Taurus 856 in my coat pocket nowadays.

So, I have a lot of inexpensive handguns thanks in great part to being a college student's budget but they've all been dead set reliable and have worked for me.
 
I would use any firearm, no matter how cheap I bought it. If they were reliable, then I would consider their use for other purposes rather than just range toys.

No matter how cheap, they are all fun!

Edit: Unless they were unsafe to use of course, then I probably wouldn't own it unless it had some kind of collector value or it appealed to me some how.
 
I got a .38 special derringer thrown in to sweeten a trade for a XD40sc. I'd drop it in a pocket when I went to the corner stop & rob for a cup of coffee to go. The earlier poster (with 16 posts) notwithstanding, I felt it more effective than harsh words. I also gave up swearing a long time ago.

I've since traded it for a .22 mag derringer so I can use snake shot on ATV trips in the desert.
 
If I had a super tight budget, but wanted to defend myself, I would have zero reservations using a Hi Point and TulAmmo.
 
I always love these 'cheap gun' threads where somebody starts talking out their 4th point of contact about how "If your life is only worth $169 go buy a HiPoint, har har har!"

Must be nice to afford $400 for a good police-trade Glock. Or $300 for a Ruger or a Taurus. Or $250 for a police-trade S&W.

I'm fortunate enough to be able to spend some cash on nicer guns. And I've gotten some nicer guns for really good prices, like a nice police-trade S&W 10-6 HB 4" for $159.

But y'all who start bashing HiPoints, C&Rs and any gun that costs less than any arbitrary dollar amount- Y'all ever been dirt poor and broke, with a psycho stalker ex-boyfriend and a court system that thinks a TRO is as good as a jail cell? Ever had to choose between paying the electric bill's final notice or getting that flat tire replaced so you can stop running on the donut spare for another month?

You can pick up a HiPoint C9, a Polish PA64 Makarov, or an 1895 Nagant revolver for well under $175.00 with a box of ammo and a gun lock, including sales tax. Any of them will perforate a goblin quite nicely, but they won't look all sexy under the flourescent lights in the evidence cage like a nice Glock or Kimber.

As long as in my examination the pistol was mechanically safe to fire its designed ammunition, price would not even come into the equation. I've got a 25 auto vest-pocket that I paid $10 for. I've got a couple of free guns. All of them go bang. Price has nothing to do with utility. Certainly there are some poorly made inexpensive guns which would be bad choices for defense use, but there are also some really solid guns that go for cheap if you look.

Judging purely on price? Stupid. Discriminatory. Don't do it.

Sure, my life or anyone's life is worth "more" than a $99 used HiPoint C9. But I just may not be able to afford better. Not that I wouldn't wish to have better, I just don't have the money.

Sure, you say- Take that $150 for the HiPoint and put it in an envelope, and then add to it for a couple months and then you could maybe afford a $400 Glock.

Assuming nothing happens to suddenly lay claim to that little envelope of greenbacks- maybe a kid gets sick, or the car breaks down, or some other unexpected bill crops up- Or maybe that psycho stalker ex-boyfriend will kick in your door, strangle you, and pocket that envelope of cash when he attacks you THIS month. Oh well. At least you were saving up!
 
Last edited:
The number of dollars one exchanges for a firearm has no bearing on whether one can successfully defend himself with that firearm.

Given x dollars to spend on a carry gun, consider an initial spending formula something like this:

.2x on the gun itself
.1x on appropriate means of carrying it
.4x on training, licensure, and range time
.3x on ammo
 
I suppose it would depend on what the alternatives were. If I didn't have any other gun, it really wouldn't matter. I'd use what I could get. I wouldn't care if it was a Raven 25 or an RG-22.

I'm fresh out of long claws, and sharp teeth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top