Chicago Defender reports on gun-toting aldermen!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Don Gwinn

Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,384
Location
Virden, IL
Pistol packin’ aldermen protected by the law
by Faith Okpotor
February 3, 2006


Many - perhaps most - Chicago aldermen have chosen not to exercise their statutory right to carry a weapon.

Most, that is, except the fiery, hat-wearing alderman from the Third Ward.

Dorothy Tillman startled those present at a Police and Fire Committee meeting of the Chicago City Council several years ago, an aldermanic aide recalled, when the issue of aldermen owning guns was broached.

"I carry a gun," she announced, pulling a pistol out of her purse.

Share your thoughts on this story on theChicagoDefender.com message board .

A survey of all 50 aldermen had one aldermanic aide - not from Tillman's office - say, "You should talk to Tillman. Tillman is your girl."

Despite the fact that it is illegal for ordinary citizens to carry concealed weapons in Chicago, it's different for alderman. An 1872 state law allows aldermen and other municipal officials, as peace officers, to carry guns, make arrests and detain suspects "after receiving a certificate attesting to the successful completion of a training course administered by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board."

Sheila Albright, an assistant to the director of the training standards board, said her agency does not have a record of how many municipal officials have guns, nor of how many have undergone the necessary training.

Some aldermen who do not personally bear arms said they understand why others would want to.

"I don't need one," said Ald. Brian Doherty (41st), the lone City Council Republican from the far Northwest Side. "I feel secure in this area." But Doherty said he would carry a gun if he lived in a high-crime neighborhood.

"In this position we don't have bodyguards," Doherty said. "[Aldermen with guns] have the ability to defend themselves." He added that Ald. Edward Burke (14th), chairman of the Finance Committee, and Tillman both carry guns. Neither Burke nor Tillman returned numerous calls seeking comment.

Burke also has the distinction of being the only alderman with a security detail from the Chicago Police Department.

Of the 15 aldermen who responded to inquiries, 14 said they do not have guns, six said they had no problem with aldermen being allowed to carry concealed weapons and two disagree with the idea altogether.

Those two, Toni Preckwinkle (4th) and Latasha Thomas (17th), were vocal.

"I am a big supporter of gun control," Preckwinkle said curtly, "and I don't carry a gun."

Thomas said, "I am not a fan of guns. I don't think I need it. I use the police just like any other citizen." Thomas also said it is unnecessary for aldermen to pack heat, and that if the matter ever came before her, she would vote to repeal the law.

Ald. Anthony Beale (9th), being a hunter, has guns and a firearms identification card, said Rich Ringer, his spokesman. But Ringer said Beale does not carry concealed weapons on his person as a peace officer.

Another alderman opposed to guns is Walter Burnett Jr. (27th).

"I am totally against it," Burnett said, adding, however, that he would not criticize his colleagues who have chosen to own guns. "It has an effect on people's emotions. They get confrontational when they have a gun."

Emotions definitely ran wild on one occasion. Tillman allegedly brandished her gun during a shouting and shoving match at a ward redistricting meeting in November 1991. She allegedly pulled a .38-caliber snub-nosed revolver. The incident resulted in a reference to Chicago by a Washington Post writer as the "wild, wild (Mid)west."

Perhaps the most remarkable thing over the 134 years the law has been in effect is that no gunfights have taken place during a City Council meeting or the often contentious committee meetings - such as deliberations for the recently passed smoking ban.

Former state Rep. Lee Preston, D-Chicago, now a Cook County judge, said he unsuccessfully tried to repeal the law when he was serving in the General Assembly. Preston said his measure failed because aldermen were successful in getting their legislators to protect their clout.

"It is bizarre," Preston said. "It makes absolutely no sense. They have badges, they can initiate arrests. The law is archaic. It ought to be repealed. If it makes you feel safer that aldermen are out there carrying guns without training..."

Mayor Richard M. Daley and Gov. Rod Blagojevich have recently repeated calls to ban assault weapons in Illinois. According to a Chicago Police Department 2004 murder analysis report, 313 of the 448 murders in Chicago were committed using handguns, not assault weapons.

Gun control opponents have criticized a policy that allows aldermen, but not ordinary citizens, to bear arms.

Ald. Ariel Reboyras (30th) has a gun license dating back to his days as director of security for the city's water purification plant, but said he never purchased one.

However, he said: "I think it is a good law. We are protecting individuals."

"I carry my badge everywhere," Reboyras added as he pulled the badge from his pocket and read from its insignia: "City of Chicago, Alderman."

Faith Okpotor is a reporter for the Medill News Service.
 
Perhaps the most remarkable thing over the 134 years the law has been in effect is that no gunfights have taken place during a City Council meeting or the often contentious committee meetings - such as deliberations for the recently passed smoking ban.
This is tempting to comment on this one but naah.
This law makes me wonder what the alderman are doing that they need to carry a gun? No I'm not saying they don't have 2A rights like everyone else.
 
Keep in mind that this is a state law. We're not just talking about Chicago; every small-town Mayor and Alderman in the state can carry a pistol.
 
Hypocrisy at its finest. One has police protection! I would not want a CCW if I could have a few of Chicago's Finest protecting me when I went out for milk at midnight. If they will not give us CCW then we should move to have the bill re-appealed. I also feel the same way about LEOs who are allowed to carry while we are not. It sickens me due to the fact that I am not trusted as a citizen while I pay taxes, vote, and have to depend on others who are not responsible for me.
 
Don,
That's not exactly true. While the definition of a peace officer does include certain elected officials, unless those officials have completed the Mandatory Firearms Training required by law (currently 40 hours) and have an employment card with their certificate on file with the Police Standards and Training Board they cannot legally be armed.

State law does consider them peace officers, but a peace officer can't be legally be armed without completion of the course. I know of a police chief here in Southern Illinois who is a sworn officer, but only works in an administrative capacity, and doesn't carry a firearm because he never has completed Mandatory Firearms Training.

Peace officers are not exempt from the FOID law either. Some news organization should file a Freedom of Information Act request with the ISP to find out if Tillman has a FOID card. A similar request should be filed with the Police Standards and Training Board to see if she, or any other Chicago Alderman has completed Mandatory Firearms Training.

Do you remember the story I posted a couple years back about the mayor from down here who was arrested for UUW and tried to use the peace officer thing to get out of the charges? A check with the training board revealed he had never completed MFT and the felony UUW charge stuck.

Jeff
 
OK, but every mayor and alderman has the legal privilege of taking that training, correct? I mean, my statement is akin to saying all law-abiding citizens of a certain age with clean records can carry handguns in Indiana.

Someone could respond "well, not if they don't apply for the right permit," but that doesn't really mean they can't carry a pistol, because that permit is shall-issue.

Is there some discretion in this system so that some of these officials don't have access to the training, or can't get certified for some reason?
 
Don,
I'll check with the guys at the MTU and see what they say about access to the course. I do know that there is no block on the employment card for alderman. I suppose they could be carried on the rolls as auxillary officers.

I still doubt that the Chicago aldermen would bother to check the law before arming themselves. The Chicago delegation in the legislature manages to exempt Chicago and Cook county from a lot of state laws anyway, they may have expemted themselves from that one too.

Jeff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top