Chopped an older H&R single shot to 20" and re-installed orig bead

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
I followed Macchina's lead once again and purchased a for-wood-stock Remington Supercell recoil pad online... but the pad is too small.

I may head on down to the lgs for a slip-on pad so I can shoot full-power 00 buck with this thing again, until I find the appropriate-fit screw-on pad. Reduced-recoil stuff doesn't hurt, but I'd like to wield some pwn0rship with regular buck!

:D
 
Remember federal law states 18" from reciever to end of the barrel, and it must have a sight.

Really? That's the first time I've heard of this requirement. Do you have a link?

John
 
OP, how is the weight /handling now that all the weight is gone from the front?

I'd think about taking a forstner bit to the butt to lighten it up a bit if it's rear-heavy; under a pachmeyer recoil pad...
 
Balance

desidog

OP, how is the weight /handling now that all the weight is gone from the front?

I'd think about taking a forstner bit to the butt to lighten it up a bit if it's rear-heavy; under a pachmeyer recoil pad...


It has felt fine... but since you ask, I wanted to see where the balance point was, just because. The barrel is fairly thick-walled, say, compared to a Remington pump barrel. Could be the engineering dictated it in light of the alloy used. Who knows.

But it's front-heavy! and still handles nicely. :)

008_zpsa7382bc9.jpg



Not quite! touching the trigger guard...

006_zpsc729cca5.jpg



loose noose

A "Limbsaver" recoil pad would be ideal, for just about any hi-power shotgun load.


I ran over to my lgs right after my last post and snagged this Limbsaver. I was lucky; it was the last one in stock, in any size. 10 days later, they're still out of stock, and I haven't had a chance to go shoot it yet! :-|

010_zpsc40a0e36.jpg

009_zps3b03049a.jpg

Anything! will be better than the hard-rubber/nearly-metal butt plate that was on the gun when I shot it last. 1600 fps rifled lead slugs made me make noises. The reduced-recoil stuff wasn't painful. Just the standard-power buck (1325 fps) and those damned Win X slugs. yeehawww!


I had ordered a Remington Supercell screw-on pad, but as you can see the H&R's buttstock cross section is larger. I used the H&R stock plate to draw this outline:

011_zps85d86fba.jpg

I'll throw this Supercell pad on my HD Wingmaster.

I'm pleased that you fellrz! have shown any continued interest in this gun. It's a great piece! Still need to get a buttstock sidesaddle...


Oh! I snapped this pic with one of my (rare-in-the-U.S.) Coleman kerosene-calibrated single-mantle lanterns running for you guys; it's a Model 249.

012_zps343e1eda.jpg

:)
 
Tardy Update...

.
I don't see that I mentioned this here in this thread, but I picked up a 20 gauge H&R a month or two after I chopped this 12 ga.

20131229_194522_zpsd15f3625.jpg

mio mentioned earlier in the thread that he'd have left the 12 ga barrel length alone. I think I'll leave the 28" 20-ga barrel be. It's just a classic example of this type of gun.


:)
 
h&rs.jpg
Background:
1947 Harrington & Richardson Topper M48, 30" full choke. Handy gun. Decided not to cut it.

Foreground:
1969 Harrington & Richardson Topper 158, formerly 30" full choke, now 19.5" cylinder bore. $50 gunstore junk rack special this summer.

I cut it to that length because it is roughly the same length as the stocked receiver.

Going to put a different bead on the end of the cut one.
 
Flare the muzzle a little. Helps with slug accuracy in my experience over not. Doesn't hurt shot loads. Just some advise. Take it or leave it. Not much,but some.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top