Christie vetoes gun ban bills

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tom609

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
534
Location
NJ Pinelands
I just received the following email from the NJ Assoc.of Rifle & Pistol Clubs...


GOVERNOR CHRISTIE
VETOES FINAL GUN BILLS!

FIFTY CALIBER BAN - DEAD!

SWEENEY F.I.D. BILL - DEAD!

TRACE DATA BREACH - DEAD!


In a huge blow to anti-gun politicians and the gun ban lobby, today Governor Christie flat-out vetoed the fifty caliber ban (A3659) and conditionally vetoed two other bills - Senate President Stephen Sweeney's "kitchen sink" F.I.D. card bill (S2723), and a bill that that would have forced the State Police to breach confidentiality of protected gun trace data in violation of federal law (A3797). A fourth bill creating a task force to study school security issues was signed by the Governor (A3583).



A "conditional veto" means that the legislation is dead, unless the legislature reconvenes to resurrect it through amendments that meet strict conditions imposed by the Governor. Whether anti-gun Democrats have the stomach to swallow those conditions (see details below) remains to be seen. Alternatively, the legislature could try to override any veto (conditional or otherwise) by a 2/3 vote of both houses, which is highly unlikely given the current composition of the legislature.

"After 7 months of intense battle over misguided legislation that won't stop another crime or prevent another tragedy, we are grateful that Governor Christie has finally ended the discussion on the worst of the bills by tossing them onto the scrap heap where they belong," said ANJRPC Executive Director Scott Bach. "These vetoes put gun-banning politicians on notice that exploiting tragedy to advance an agenda against legal gun owners, instead of punishing violent criminals, will not be entertained."

Today's actions come in the wake of last week's signing of ten gun bills by Governor Christie (two helped gun owners, two were opposed by gun owners, and six were neutralized based on gun owner input but are appropriately very tough on violent criminals). New Jersey already has some of the strictest and most extreme gun laws in the nation.

The bill flat-out vetoed by Governor Christie today was:

A3659 - the fifty caliber gun ban that would have: prohibited high muzzle-energy guns of any caliber; blocked heirlooms from family members; held grandfathered owners civilly liable for damages if their firearms were ever used in a crime; and forfeited the pending purchase orders of licensed gun owners for these $10,000+ firearms.

The notion that banning any particular tool makes society safer is demonstrably false, and ignores the obvious reality that someone intent on doing evil will not be stopped or deterred if one particular tool becomes unavailable. "If box cutters could take down the World Trade Center, does anyone really believe that banning box cutters will stop the next terrorist?" commented Bach. "The same is true of firearms - banning the fifty caliber or any other firearm will not stop someone bent on doing evil."

The Governor's statement on A3659 criticizes the scope of the ban, notes drafting errors that would defeat grandfathering, and observes that rather than combating crime and terror, the bill only serves to threaten law-abiding gun owners with imprisonment for lawful recreation.

The two bills conditionally vetoed by Governor Christie today are:

S2723 - Senate President Stephen Sweeney's "kitchen sink" FID card bill, a 42-page monstrosity universally despised by gun owners and sportsmen. The bill, touted by Democrats as the "centerpiece" of their gun bill package and a "national model," would have: thrown out existing FID cards and replaced them with a privacy-invading driver license endorsement or other form of ID; suspended Second Amendment rights without proof of firearms training; ended firearms sales directly between background-checked licensed gun owners; and had numerous other impacts.

Under Governor Christie's conditional veto, S2723 could only be resurrected if both houses of the legislature agreed to the following conditions:


- Remove all provisions that would have created a new electronic FID card (keeps the existing permitting system in place);



- Remove all provisions that would have suspended Second Amendment rights without proof of firearms training;



- Remove all provisions that would have ended firearms sales directly between background-checked licensed gun owners; and



- Add a provision requiring the State Police to develop and promulgate literature regarding safe firearms storage and ownership.



It is unknown whether Democratic legislative leadership would accept these conditions. While doing so would salvage what is left of their "centerpiece," the final bill would be a gutted version, stripped of the most blatant attacks on legal gun owners, and very likely an embarrassment to Democrats.

If Democrats decided to swallow that bitter pill, other key provisions of the Sweeney bill that would be retained would include: requiring an FID card or other permit for all ammunition purchases; limiting shipment of online ammunition purchases to the address on the FID card; making it a 4th degree crime if injury or death results from the failure to properly secure firearms; making it a 4th degree crime for someone prohibited from possessing firearms to possess ammunition; requiring mental health screeners to inquire about firearms ownership of those being considered for involuntary commitment for mental health reasons; and revocation of NJ concealed carry permits upon conviction of a crime of the 4th degree or higher.

The Governor's statement accompanying his conditional veto expressed support in principle for some of these provisions, yet also criticized the legislature as "shortsighted" for focusing on gun control instead of comprehensive violence solutions. The statement also noted the bill's failure "to directly combat violence," and the current unavailability of the technology that would be required to implement the digitized FID card.

A3797 - conditionally vetoed because of one section that required the State Police to breach confidentiality of federal gun trace data in direct violation of federal law that limits the data to law enforcement only. This was an attempt by frustrated gun banners to circumvent that federal law, so that idiosyncrasies of the ATF's trace system could be exploited and manipulated to falsely suggest that law abiding citizens are a source of "crime guns." ATF has opposed similar efforts to circumvent confidentiality, which could compromise ongoing investigations. If the legislature amends the bill to remove this illegal provision, the amended bill would then return to the Governor's desk.
 
Note that while this is a partial win, Christie almost certainly didn't do this out of any personal integrity, he did it to keep himself in the Politics Game(tm). If he ever feels he can still win elections while approving bans, he'll do so. Can you say "Romney Jr."?
 
I must say I haven't been intimately involved in the NJ battle but I heard he approved 10 other bills (but according to your post they were watered down). I'm glad he didn't go full on anti in this latest vote but as Pavepusher said it might just be flavor of the month instead of actual integrity.

Our representatives are there to do just that, represent our wishes, and that's what many do but when it comes to the Constitution it doesn't matter if 99% what something that goes against it, they took an oath to uphold it. If the People want to change it so badly they can try to appeal the 2nd amendment.
 
He is definitely positioning himself for a run. I understand he' s now off to a weekend fundraiser in the Hamptons with Rudy Giuliani. That having been said, we here in NJ don't get to enjoy things like this too often, so humor us if we sound overly excited by your standards. There are a lot of angry anti-gun people in NJ tonight and we got to poke them in the eye.
 
He is definitely positioning himself for a run. I understand he' s now off to a weekend fundraiser in the Hamptons with Rudy Giuliani. That having been said, we here in NJ don't get to enjoy things like this too often, so humor us if we sound overly excited by your standards. There are a lot of angry anti-gun people in NJ tonight and we got to poke them in the eye.

I'm thinking I might hop across the state line and try out one of your shooting ranges, just to poke the antis a bit more. Any good places within reason of Wilmington?

Christie is an enigma, that's for sure. Congrats on a partial win.
 
Note that while this is a partial win, Christie almost certainly didn't do this out of any personal integrity, he did it to keep himself in the Politics Game(tm). If he ever feels he can still win elections while approving bans, he'll do so. Can you say "Romney Jr."?

When any politician does the right thing it should be praised, regardless the reason. If he is doing it in preparation for a run, then HE IS DOING THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE in a system designed to reward that sort of thing. In a state that is over 70% Democrat, this took balls. Props, governor.
 
He is definitely positioning himself for a run. I understand he' s now off to a weekend fundraiser in the Hamptons with Rudy Giuliani. That having been said, we here in NJ don't get to enjoy things like this too often, so humor us if we sound overly excited by your standards. There are a lot of angry anti-gun people in NJ tonight and we got to poke them in the eye.
And pleased you should be! Make sure to tell people to write him and call his office to let him know you appreciate him upholding his oath to the Constitution. Tell him the gun owners of NJ are watching him carefully and will make sure to support him (or his opponent) come reelection. These are the only words our representatives hear any more but are still powerful nonetheless.

Gratz on the victory! :)
 
Christie greatly exceeded my expectations. I thought that he might sign the .50 Barrett ban and conditionally veto the others but with conditions that the state legislature could actually accept.

I thought the .50 Barrett ban was in most danger of becoming law because there are only a handful of the rifles in the state, in part because there aren't very many places to shoot one in this very small state.

Of the bills that Christie did sign, most aren't bad for gun owners, and a couple are actually good for gun owners.

Cristie doesn't seem to be a gun guy, but at least he's learning. He has enough accumulated karma that he won't be hurt by this too much in November. People who won't vote for him because of the gun bill vetoes probably weren't going to vote for him anyway.

Maybe the tide is turning. New Jersey is the only dark blue state that's rejected more stringent controls. But New Jersey still ranks in the 6-10 worst states for gun laws in the nation.
 
Remember Bob, when you don't have to be on the defensive, you should focus on offense :)
A few petitions, facebook/email carpet blasts should help remind him of the People's will.
 
- Remove all provisions that would have ended firearms sales directly between background-checked licensed gun owners;

Once again, the antis actions speak louder than words. Both parties have been background checked and yet they still want to stop them from being able to sell directly to each other.
 
from 16 Aug 2013 statement concerning Gov Christie veto of certain NJ gun bills:
....rather than combating crime and terror, the bill only serves to threaten law-abiding gun owners with imprisonment for lawful recreation.

From the 1960s this has been my objection to most gun control proposals (which come mostly from the left and Democrats who ban "heat shields" and "magazines" but cannot define what they are or how the bills work when faced with a microphone and camera--other than it's against guns so it's gotta be good).

While "lawful recreation" is my primary interest in firearms, I would add self-defense, civilian marksmanship practice, design and historical collection, and guns kept as curios, ornaments and keepsakes.

This should become our slogan or talking point: Rather than combating crime and gun violence, these bills only serve to threaten law-abiding gun owners with imprisonment for traditional lawful possession and use of arms.
 
Last edited:
THR comment

This is great news for all of us in NJ. Better than I had hoped for after the way that the NY, CT, and CO governors and legislatures have acted. Please do take a minute to thank our governor, your opinions do hold a lot of weight with him.

You can call the Governor's office at 609-292-6000, write him at P.O. Box 001, Trenton, N.J. 08625, or send an email using the online contact form

http://nj.gov/governor/contact/utm_...gn=press+alert+june+24+night&utm_medium=email

(select "law and public safety" from the drop-down menu, then pick any sub-topic).



Also take a moment to thank the good people at the ANJRPC for their literally tireless efforts on our behalf.

[email protected]
 
Now we have "lawful recreation"

I'm so happy about these vetoes. Compared to what happened in NY, CT, CO, or MD (and what is in process in CA), NJ got off pretty easy. It also helps draw a line in the sand, even in a Blue state like NJ. The quote
rather than combating crime and terror, the bill only serves to threaten law-abiding gun owners with imprisonment for lawful recreation
is great. Forget about some narrow restriction to self defense in the home, Christie is on record that lawful recreation falls under the 2A.

I was very happy the night Christie was elected, and that was foreshadowing of this. If Corzine was still governor, he would have been competing with Cuomo on who could confiscate things faster.

I plan on continuing to enjoy lawful recreation with my S&W 500, and maybe consider a shorter barreled sibling. At least the Hornady 350gr XTP are back in stock.
 
he is a sell out.... supporting anti bills then striking them down.... who's side is he really on?
 
he is a sell out.... supporting anti bills then striking them down.... who's side is he really on?

We cannot keep eating our own. This guy is not even my third choice for 2016, as of now at least, he is the most likely to get the nomination so it is wise to not eat him just yet.

As for which side he is on, he kept the worst of these bills from becoming law in a state that is overwhelmingly opposed to his vetoes. It is silly to expect a politician to not walk a fine line, particularly where he is from. This is a good outcome.

I appreciate your disdain for how politicians operate, but this is what we have for a system.
 
AKElroy, I disagree. the only state Christie should win in the republican primary is his own. nobody else should support such a liberal masquerading as a conservative at times.
 
Jerry, as I stated, he is not in my top three. He is, though, significantly to the right of our last two nominees both on guns and his track record busting unions.

If he continues decisions like these against the will of his own state-wide electorate, then he will continue to become more popular nationally, particularly with the republican base that was shunned in 2008 and 2012 and not surprisingly, failed to show when it counted. As for not winning a national primary, the last poll I saw has him leading by double digits over all republican challengers.

If he maintains a decent RKBA defense, he can undo some of the damage caused by his Obama-snuggling during the Sandy recovery photo ops.

We should praise a good outcome when we see it, but I agree with you that the pudding comes in seeing if he is the real deal with future challenges.
 
I would add that the next president will likely see THREE appointments to the high court. I would further remind that every major RKBA decision of late has been 5/4. Scalia, Kennedy and Ginsburg will all be 80 or older when our next president is elected.

Getting out our base is CRITICAL, and a strong RKBA stance is probably the best way for that to happen. If Christie can keep himself out of trouble on this issue, he has a shot. If he can become an even stronger RKBA advocate, he has an excellent opportunity given his broad appeal in so radically turning his state around financially.

Fair or not, he is entering the fray with far less media scrutiny than his likely challengers will face, and that is not an insignificant feat. Why he has more support from them is something I will be keeping a close eye on as this campaign unfolds.
 
I don't think Christie could be nominated or elected President in 2016.

But I do think that he might be able to help get a strong 2A-supporting candidate elected if he were to receive the Vice Presidential nomination.

I'm just happy that NJ's awful gun laws haven't gotten even worse.

For now.
 
2016 is a long way down the road. As shrinkmd said, we came very close to having Corzine again, and that would have been devastating. NJ isn't Alabama or Texas so we are a ways behind you guys, but trying to crawl back. If for no other reason than to help US for the next few years, let Christie know that people in Alabama and Texas appreciate what he did today. Come 2016, do what you have to do. Nothing good ever happens when we fight amongst ourselves.

AK, thanks for the positive comments.
 
Last edited:
From the Burlington County Times (NJ) today. This is what we deal with. I would think he broke a few laws, if this is indeed true.

Earlier Friday, gun control advocate Bryan Miller took a disabled .50-caliber sniper rifle to the Statehouse to demonstrate its destructive capacity.
"These are military weapons designed and manufactured to destroy material targets such as chemical plants, refineries, chemical and rail tanks and passenger aircraft, targets that abound in New Jersey," he said. "A potential attack with a .50-caliber weapon could have a catastrophic environmental impact in the Garden State."
 
"These are military weapons designed and manufactured to destroy material targets such as chemical plants, refineries, chemical and rail tanks and passenger aircraft, targets that abound in New Jersey," he said. "A potential attack with a .50-caliber weapon could have a catastrophic environmental impact in the Garden State."

That is fantastic news. The military can now save all that money it's spending on artillery and tactical aircraft, and just buy .50 cal. rifles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top