Civilian Battle Rifles--Does Mag Capacity Matter THAT Much?

Status
Not open for further replies.

BerettaNut92

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
9,723
Say one is going from one extreme to the other--an AR-15 with 30 rounds to an M1 Garand with 8 rounds.

Would you consider this a 'fair' trade? Does magazine capacity matter that much for a defensive rifle?

How about going from a 20-round M1A down to a 10-round SLB2000K, both in .308?

I may 'download' mag capacity to find a rifle I 'like' more, and it's more politically correct, and got that HK polygonal barrel. Your thoughts?
 
Mag Capacity does not really matter much..since a Civilian's ammo supply will be quite limited..suppressive fire is out of the question.

Shot placement is more important. I think that with an M1 Garand any civilian would be very well armed.

The 165 grain black tip 30-06 ammunition is capable of penetrating though cover that would defeat 5.56 NATO and 7.62x39mm.
 
Magazine capacity depends on the type of ammunition in the rifle as well as if you have support of another shooter available as you have to reload.

Shot placement and odds of hitting is also a prime concern.

Back in the musket days, armies fought in massed lines at close range because one soldier with a musket against another soldier with another musket, both in foxholes, you'd expend both countries' bullet and powder supply before you run out of soldiers. :D

With rifles and especially with repeater rifles, massed lines at close range pretty much disappeared, and now you have fast raids with shooting on the move.

With semi-auto and full-auto machineguns, fast raids are not as effective, so you have multiple units covering each other as they outflank an enemy position.

With a 30 round AR-15, and multiple magazines in pouches, I could afford to send a few rounds downrange even if I don't have a COM shot. With a 8 round M1 Garand, I'm definitely making sure each one connects, because if I miss with shot#6, BG#8 might get me.... well, maybe not... thats what bayonets are for. :evil:
 
Would really depend for me on what/who I was fighting. A mob/riot like in LA a few years back, I'd want 30 mags with or without backup. Against a small group of "raiders" in a SHTF scenario I'd be very happy with 8rd en-blocs. Guess it boils down to how "organized" the attacker would be. The more a mob, the bigger the mag I'd want. More a squad than a mob, give me "firepower." Guess the best happy medium would be 20rds in a M1a.
 
The M1's a great rifle, its only downside is the en bloc clips. They are starting to be harder to find and more expensive. That and the fact it chucks them out of the rifle when empty makes them even less desirable. Sooner or later your going to have a single shot.
I'd worry less about being politically correct, and get the gun you want, reguardless of mag capacity. If you take the time to learn how to use it and adjust your tactics to it, just about anything will work. Especially at the range. :)
 
What is it that you are defending against?

Have the North Koreans invaded?
Do you live near a port city and a nuke just went off?
Natural disaster isolated you and your family?
Have riots come to your neighborhood?
Has the federal government gone mad?

In my opinion the nuke, riot and natural disaster scenarios are the only likely events. They are much less likely than having an attorney ruin you and your family, but they are possible. So, what are you doing to protect your family from likely problems? Do you have potassium iodide pills available? Do you have dried food, water and such stuff?

You won't trade one rifle for another. You will buy them all:)
 
Yes.

But it sure is nice to have a selection sitting on the wall. That way you grab what is appropriate for the situation.

IMHO I would like to have:

a long range rifle even if limited capacity.

a shotgun.

a medium capacity (20-30 round mags or 10 round mags with some rapid reload capability such as stripper clips).

a medium capacity general purpose rifle such as a 30-30 lever gun.

at least one honker, spritzer type round like the 30-06 or 8mm for penetration.
 
Few owners are skilled enough in marksmanship, fieldcraft, and tactics for it to matter, I think. Even those who were in the military, for the most part, are trained in how to do things the military way. As John Q., you aren't going to have much in the way of combined arms support. Ask somebody who actually fought as part of a guerilla unit against a better armed and supplied foe. He might know for sure.
 
In simple terms, yes the more the merrier. Why? If you opponent shoots at you 8 times and has to reload, but you have a 30 round magazine, while he is reloading, you are not. I know ideally you wouldn't want to take 29 shots to hit someone, but from simplistic thinking, the less time you have to spend reloading, the better. So that means two things, whatever you have, practice your reloads from all positions and have the largest and most practical magazine you could have.
 
The Garands were great guns to go prone with, because no 20-rounders were sticking out from under it... I prefer a 10-rounder for just that reason, the 20's get in the way.. Of course, as a libertarian, I'm PO'ed that I don't have a choice in the PRK, but I digress..

We WON the war with 8-round en-blocs and so I would think they are sufficient... The Japanese ran when they heard the PING!!! and anybody that didn't want a '06 where the sun don't shine, did the same and will do the same again..

Skunk, I think 10-rounders are just fine... But if you are paranoid (which you are) move out of the PRK, and buy a 5 rounder, 10 rounder, and 20 rounder for your M1A and find out for yourself..

I like the 5-rounders as they sit almost flush, and I can use them for hunting!! here Bambi!!
 
We WON the war with 8-round en-blocs and so I would think they are sufficient

We won the war with 8-round en-bloc clips when the standard infantry rifle for EVERY other county in the world was a bolt action. Taint so no more.
 
We WON the war with 8-round en-blocs

and armor support, and air support, and plentiful artillery, and an enormous navy, and the greatest manufacturing capability on the planet, and not having to actually fight any part of the war on the CONUS. M1 was, and is, a great weapon. It is not the reason we won WWII.
 
Tactical Civilian Battle Rifle

If Skunky invented this new classification, is would have to be the

Tactical Civilian Battle Rifle:rolleyes:

The importance of magazine capacity is 1) dependent on the marksmanship abilities of the operator.....2) dependent on the effectiveness of the rounds fired.
 
Well, honestly, I feel that the ten round mag in my SL8 is less adequate than the ten round mag in my Enfield. Looks like I'll have to spend the 90EU on 30 round G36-mags one day. ;)
 
I have High cap and smaller mags for my AR.

If the hordes are storming the gates I'd like the high caps. For most other events (and the more likely ones) 8 rounds is enough. Might want extra mags though...just in case;)
 
OK if ya must know........

I'm gonna do the politically correct thing and land in the middle of the choices :uhoh: Therefore , my CBR is going to be an M1A with a twenty round mag :) AND , just to make the gun haters really hate it , gonna carry four more loaded mags:D !! Question then is , how many bandoleers do I halfta carry to make 'em go:cuss:

Yeah it's heavy but unless home is unlivable , it's still home and it's still ours :scrutiny:

Jack
 
Can you accomplish more with 30 rounds of 5.56 X 45 than you can with 8 rounds of 30.06? Or 20 rounds of .308? That is the questions.

In an urban uprising, I might go for the biggest mag available. For many other situations, fewer, bigger rounds might be the right answer.
 
i would think that 20 rounds of .308 would be better than 8 rounds of . 30-06, cause the .308's almost as powerful. also, aren't enbloc clips being manufactured by springfield, now that they're making the garand again?
 
Some feel only an ak with a 75 round drum is enough. I don't consider an ar and a 30 round magazine the limit because there are 40 round mags around for an ak also. The only 50 rounders I have seen were welded up and I did not know how reliable they might be. And yes there are 100 round drums for the ar and ak, but a 75 round drum for a hundred bucks seems more affordable to me.

I prefer 308 and 20 round mags.

Personally I tell anyone if they learn their weapon well, most anything can and will get the job done.

Me with a new rifle at the range, I have trouble using new to me sights. I have to learn how this thing recoils and work on follow up shots. Then I also have to learn how best to reload.

The older guy with a rifle he has owned for years and has a few thousand rounds through. He knows how it will need to be brought back on target for a 2nd shot and he is so smoooooth on reloads that he is scary fast. All this with a garand. :D
 
I was totally comforatable with my deer rifles including Ruger 77s and a Savage 99 in .308. Today I carry a Bushmaster simply because i like it. Would go back to the other rifles in a heartbeat. Carry what you like.
 
I'd say magazine capacity is important.
If it wasn't our military and police forces would be using the ten rounders that the liberal fascists have so readily forced upon us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top