Col. David Hackworth

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 28, 2004
Messages
1,352
Location
Minnesota
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--obit-hackworth0505may05,0,4511774.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut


David Hackworth, Vietnam vet and military analyst, dies at 74


By MATT APUZZO
Associated Press Writer

May 5, 2005, 2:07 PM EDT

HARTFORD, Conn. -- Retired Army Col. David Hackworth, a decorated Vietnam veteran who spoke out against the war and later became a journalist and an advocate for military reform, has died, his wife said Thursday. He was 74.

Hackworth died Wednesday in Tijuana, Mexico, where he was receiving treatment for bladder cancer. His wife, Eilhys England, was with him.

"He died in my arms," she said. The couple lived in Greenwich.

Hackworth, a Newsweek correspondent during the Gulf War, worked in recent years as a syndicated columnist for King Features, where he has been highly critical of the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq war.

"Most combat vets pick their fights carefully. They look at their scars, remember the madness and are always mindful of the fallout," Hackworth wrote in February. "That's not the case in Washington, where the White House and the Pentagon are run by civilians who have never sweated it out on a battlefield."

Hackworth ignited a national debate last year when he reported that, rather than personally signing condolence letters to the families of fallen soldiers, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld used a machine.

Rumsfeld later promised to sign each letter be hand.

"Hack never lost his focus," said Roger Charles, president of Soldiers for the Truth, a California-based veterans group for which Hackworth served as chairman. "That focus was on the young kids that our country sends to bleed and die on our behalf. Everything he did in his retirement was to try to give them a better chance to win and to come home. That's one hell of a legacy."

Hackworth served four tours of duty in Vietnam and was one of the first senior officers to speak out publicly against the Vietnam War. He was nearly court-martialed before he retired from the military in 1971 and gave up his medals in protest.

He moved to Australia and made millions in a restaurant business and a duck farm. His medals were reissued by Brig. Gen. John Howard in the 1980s and he returned to the United States.

Hackworth wrote several books including "The Vietnam Primer," "About Face," and "Hazardous Duty."

Hackworth is survived by his wife of 8 years, a stepdaughter and four children from two earlier marriages, the family said.

England said he will be buried at Arlington National Cemetery but said a date has not been set.
 
I know many THR members don't think highly of Hackworth, but I've read some of the man's books and they are very thought provoking. They are well worth reading.
 
I greatly respect the man's service. He also started out as a credible military anaylist. But towards the end, he got a bit... flaky, IMO of course.
 
It's ironic because I'm reading "Steel My Soldiers' Hearts" right now. He really had a hard on about the M-16 and how terrible it is. In one scene in the book they are bulldozing a berm and turn up a dead VC still holding his AK-47. the guy has been there maybe a month or more buried in jungle crap. Hackworth jumps down, grabs the AK and says "this is what a real battle rifle should do." He pulls the bolt and fires off 30 rounds with no problem.
Reading between the lines he sounded like he could be a real a-hole but he was sincere in what he did and got results.
 
Reading between the lines he sounded like he could be a real a-hole but he was sincere in what he did and got results.

He was sincere in some of the things he did. He was also hypocritical in some of the things he did.

I don't wish ill on, nor celebrate the death of, anyone who qualifies as human (thereby excluding child molesters, terrorists and others who prey on the innocent). But I have to wonder if Hackworth will be buried with the medals/ribbons he didn't earn but wore anyway, after hounding Adm. Boorda to death over that very issue.
 
"About Face" was a strange evolution. He went from a gung-ho soldier to officer to pot-smoking war protestor. Hard to argue with his valor, though. Sorry he died, but 74 ain't so bad, especially considering all those Purple Hearts he earned, any of which could easily have been his ticket to heaven.

Rest easy, old soldier.
 
I greatly respect his service, and always sought out his writings as being very well worth reading.

I am also still troubled by his role in the Adm. Borda suicide that was pointed out above.
 
Mark

Desperate people are easy prey for charlatans

I respect his service, his principled efforts to improve the .mil environment and his utter disdain for careerist cretians.

I understand he was respected by his men.

fwiw I'm not a vet but grew up surrounded by active duty .mil types.

Hackworth talked the talk and walked the walk,

I suspicion that the careerist cretians kept the M-16 mainly to spite him and it has wound up the bane of another generation of warriors.

r
 
Hackworth had his ups and downs, but I never heard a man who served under him say a bad thing about him. Even if the stories I heard in the US Army in the 70's were only 10% true, he was a man to have on your flank.

Geoff
Who notes you should never expect mild innoffensive opinions from people who have charged hell with a bucket of water. :D
 
"Who notes you should never expect mild innoffensive opinions from people who have charged hell with a bucket of water"
:rolleyes:
He does have a point :D Them vets can be a touch ruff around the edges
 
I lost all respect for Hack after the Admiral Boorda incident.

Hack is right down there with Willie "No Honest Man" Ruger.



Mark - some people in desperation try cancer treatments which are not FDA approved. However, they are approved in other countries. That probably explains why Hack was in Mexico for treatment.
 
Hackworth served four tours of duty in Vietnam and was one of the first senior officers to speak out publicly against the Vietnam War. He was nearly court-martialed before he retired from the military in 1971 and gave up his medals in protest.
Interesting that none of the right-wingers ever ripped into him for his anti war actions. Apparrently, he "kissed and made up" with his medals after giving them away because I had heard him claim to be the most decorated living veteran (which was a lie).

I genuinely appreciate his combat service, I just don't believe it gives a man absolution to run amok and be a lying a-hole for the rest of his existence. I also think he had a paranoid obsession about the M9 pistol (see article below).

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28212
 
Liddy ripped into Hackworth on at least a couple of occasions after the Boorda fiasco. I think Limbaugh did as well.
 
Let's not criticize the dead for they are not here to defend themselves. RIP Colonel.
 
Code:
Interesting that none of the right-wingers ever ripped into him for his anti war actions.

Could be that most of them did not have the stones to question his courage?

Hackworth was a lot of things to a lot of people, good, bad, and indifferent. There is no doubt that he served the country when it was not very popular to do so.
The very same thing can be said for several people here.

I did have issues with his screaming and ranting at times, but he sure earned the right-moreso than just about everyone in Congress.

Given all the plusses and minuses, I'd rather have him beside me in a fight than most elected officials.
 
Let the dead be.

I respect anyone who stands up for their views and tries to make a difference for those suffering. Or whatever. If you stand up for your views and truly believe in them,and you are not Hitler or Stalin, or any other tyrannical psycos, then good for you. Its hard to stand up for your beliefs in america because of all this politically correct b.s. And, I may be missing the point, but I respect someone who is brave enough to "peacefully" do what they can to change something they disagree with.
 
why was he in mexico for treatment
markdido, many people go to mexico for cancer treatments that are not approved in the USA. actor steve mcqueen was one. but i have never heard of anyone that it saved.
 
If the A.M.A. didn't invent it, it does everything possible to eradicate it.

May have something to do with the fact that they dont work, cost lots of money, inflict pain and suffering needlessly on the patient, and prevent the patient from getting more appropriate treatment.
 
IMHO Hackworth was the real deal. A lot of people seem to want to bash him for a lot of the nutty things he did and said later in life. The way I see it, if you were awarded 2 DSCs, 10 Silver Stars and 8 Purple Hearts during 8 years of combat you would probably do a lot of nutty things also. Anyways I have always watched him when he made appearences on TV and I had a lot of respect for the man.

RIP Col Hackworth.
 
"May have something to do with the fact that they dont work, cost lots of money, inflict pain and suffering needlessly on the patient, and prevent the patient from getting more appropriate treatment."

Now now, don't be so hard on the AMA, they're trying to do the best they can. Oh wait, you meant... :)

there's valid observation on both sides of that battle... I mean, look at EDTA treatments and bacteriophage antibiotics, neither of which you can get here but are, and have been, effective for years (decades, in the latter case). But then the AMA keeps charlatons with quicksilver injections and snake oil at bay too.

Hackworth had opinions that were bolstered by experience... good or bad, any time experience goes away we all lose something.
 
May have something to do with the fact that they dont work, cost lots of money, inflict pain and suffering needlessly on the patient, and prevent the patient from getting more appropriate treatment.

It's a combination of: concern over long term results that won't be observed until long after most of the shorter foreign drug trials are done; concern that liablity is increased by any problems that develop if excessive care is not done; institutional inertia in how tests are done ("we've always done it like this and we always will"); the gov't's interest in keeping control over the process (shorter tests could lead to less gov't involvement); and the amount of (both legal and illegal) money involved in long term tests should those tests be shortened.
 
Hackworth had a well documented record of personal valor across multiple conflicts. His credibility and judgement, however, were highly questionable. Being bave and being right are completely different and unrelated things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top