Columnist learns to shoot...Read all about it!

Status
Not open for further replies.

rainbowbob

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
2,559
Location
Seattle, WA
A local newspaper columnist went shooting for the first time at the invitation of a reader - and liked it. We may have another convert. Who gets ink.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Biting the bullet for myself
By Nicole Brodeur

Seattle Times staff columnist

Turns out I'm a pretty good shot.

The first round was in the center of the target from about seven feet away. My aim got a little squirrelly after that, probably because I realized what I had done.

I had loaded, aimed and shot a 9-mm Glock semi-automatic, followed by a .22.

What kind of person does that?

Based on the Saturday crowd at Wade's Eastside Gun Shop in Bellevue, all kinds. Husbands and wives, a grandmother and her grandson, guy friends, guys with their girlfriends.

And me, under the watchful, safety-first eye of a man named Matthew, who had volunteered to teach me about guns and self-defense — and didn't want me to print his last name.

Matthew contacted me after I wrote about convicted sex-offender Joseph Aqui moving into Seattle's Othello neighborhood, not far from my house.

Around the same time, in the South Park neighborhood, two women were attacked by a man who had broken into their home. For more than an hour, he raped them, cut them and eventually stabbed and killed one of them. It was every woman's nightmare.

So when Matthew wrote, volunteering to teach me about gun safety and self-defense, I was open. And it surprised me.

"I feel some sympathy for your situation," he wrote. "I think I would feel a constant, low-level fear from having an identified predator nearby."

I had some options, he said. I could move (difficult and costly).

I could reach out to the neighborhood watch and install a security system (doable).

"But I also think that realistic self-defense capability would help manage and reduce that fear," he said.

That means learning how to handle, shoot and own a gun.

Is a gun really necessary, though? Not if it means joining the same club as the man who brought an assault rifle to a rally outside an event with President Obama in Arizona last week. That was the Second Amendment run amok.

So, I took an informal poll.

Some friends recoiled. Others said yes, they owned a gun, with a distinct "what of it?" tone. Clearly, they had defended themselves over defending themselves. A lot.

My dad breezily told me he once owned a .22, and it struck me as a bygone practice that was accepted in naiveté, like the "Mad Men" on TV who drink at lunch and smoke everywhere.

And then there was the dear friend who said of handguns, "I hate 'em," before hunkering down to confess, "But I really like rifles."

Former first lady Nancy Reagan once revealed she kept "a cute little gun" in her bedroom.

Could I ever do the same?

Matthew, a former NRA-certified instructor for years, started me with a "not negotiable" safety session, during which he made me read aloud the rules for safe gun handling.

At the range, my hands shook as I loaded the magazine, but then settled as I got more adept.

After an hour, and some time peering through the glass gun cases, I was in. I wanted a .22, maybe a revolver. I was tossing off gun terms like Wyatt Earp.

Then I went home and looked around. Where would I put a gun? Would my son be all right with it? Would I react quickly enough in crisis or be asking for more trouble?

I learned that between 2003 and 2007, 38 people in Washington state died in accidental shootings. I thought there might be more.

For now, it's enough to know that I can handle a gun. And maybe that confidence will be enough to save me, if that awful day comes. Maybe.

Copyright © The Seattle Times Company


Matthew, if your reading this...Good job!
 
Seattle non the less! Great read and great to hear! What a story. Thanks for sharing and right on Matt!!
 
Is a gun really necessary, though? Not if it means joining the same club as the man who brought an assault rifle to a rally outside an event with President Obama in Arizona last week. That was the Second Amendment run amok.

The columnist could have done without this little gym, but at least he's making progress.
 
The columnist could have done without this little gym, but at least he's making progress.
What "gym"? Was there a workout involved? ;)
I think you will find that "he" is a she .... At least the name used is "Nichole".
 
This might not be very "high road", but introducing women into firearms has gotten me more action than anything else. I know thats horrible and chauvenistic in our PC day, but women ENJOY shooting, once properly introduced, as do most men. And they respect the power of it. women like having a protective alpha male around. That's about the main reason that I don't partake of the females who are always surrounded by theyr homosexual, male, friends.
 
For now, it's enough to know that I can handle a gun. And maybe that confidence will be enough to save me, if that awful day comes. Maybe.

NO! It is not...
Enough that is...

She's learned just enough to get herself killed or seriously injured.

1. A .22 is better than nothing - almost.
2. She's got no clue how to use it in an SD situation
3. It seems she's likely gonna hide it away somewhere that she'll never get to if she needs it.
4. If she does get to it the whole tone of the article indicates to me that she won't have the courage to pull the trigger anyway.

She's better off with one of those home security companies. At least while she's being raped and stabbed when she hears the phone ring she'll have hope that it is the security company and maybe her not answering even though her alarm went off that they'll call the cops without having her verify there's a problem (man those stupid commercials really do crack me up).

Who knows? The cops might even show up in time do save her or NOT!
 
Wolf: I love the postings you do almost always. This one makes me wonder though, what is all this about "2. She's got no clue how to use it in an SD situation"? I'm not sure but thought she meant it for home defense situations. I never took a self defense course myself (yet). What am I missing? In short....

I ask because I always hear comments about people who "don't know how to use it in self defense" or "home protection". Perhaps my understanding of self defense and home protection are off?

For me, if one breaks into my house who should not be there I will aim and unload until there is no more in the magazine. There is not much confusion with that style of home protection. Anything less than that to me is not enough.

I'm not speaking of SD outside of the home here. Is my understanding of home protection correct or acceptable? I know you stated SD not home defense, I'm just asking!
 
Wolf: I love the postings you do almost always. This one makes me wonder though, what is all this about "2. She's got no clue how to use it in an SD situation"? I'm not sure but thought she meant it for home defense situations. I never took a self defense course myself (yet). What am I missing? In short....

I ask because I always hear comments about people who "don't know how to use it in self defense" or "home protection". Perhaps my understanding of self defense and home protection are off?

For me, if one breaks into my house who should not be there I will aim and unload until there is no more in the magazine. There is not much confusion with that style of home protection. Anything less than that to me is not enough.

I'm not speaking of SD outside of the home here. Is my understanding of home protection correct or acceptable? I know you stated SD not home defense, I'm just asking!

Understood. And totally legit questions.

RE: SD - The impression I got from the article was that the lady figured she'd learned everything she needed to learn to protect herself with a gun.

She stated:
For now, it's enough to know that I can handle a gun. And maybe that confidence will be enough to save me, if that awful day comes. Maybe.

She believes that after one training session that she can "handle" a gun. Which isn't all that atypical for one new to firearms. Maybe she's the exception, a natural (there are some) that can handle a gun with just an hour's training but probably not and especially not in a high stress SD situation. It's tough enough for people that practice regularly to get everything right and not fumble around in a high stress situation. It would be nye unto impossible for her with but a few hours training to do so.

It is difficult to simulate the stress one will experience if they ever find themselves in an SD situation but you can come close. Run a couple of miles to the range on a hot day. Have a friend be there waiting. Run up to a point about 5' from the bench where the friend is. Relax a bit, face the bench and keep your back to your friend; no talking. At some random time within a couple of minutes of your arrival your friend should be instructed to throw a bucket of ice cold water on you at which point you immediately run to your gun, pick it up (preferably one with a safety that's on) and shoot a B-27 target placed 7 yards away. You should put two shots COM and do it in less than 1.5 seconds from the time you reach the bench all the while your friend is cursing at you at the top of his lungs from about a foot or two behind you and saying some really nasty and hurtful things. That represents maybe a quarter the level of stress you'd experience in a real life or death situation. With enough practice with the handgun of your choice you'd have a pretty good chance of getting it right. But not with just an hour or two of practice. You'd be lucky to get the safety off. Keep in mind I'm talking a real life and death situation.

She speaks of confidence and that's a good thing. She'll need it. And courage and the will to pull the trigger. But that's not enough either. She'll need all that and practice, practice, practice to be able to do the mechanical things necessary to point that gun, aim it and pull the trigger. All sounds so simple but stress does funny things to a person.

If her natual response to danger is to fight - she'll have a chance. If her natural response is flight then in my opinion all that gun will do is get her killed.

For me, if one breaks into my house who should not be there I will aim and unload until there is no more in the magazine. There is not much confusion with that style of home protection. Anything less than that to me is not enough.

At least you've thought about the possibility of having to use your weapon to defend you and yours in your home. Good on ya. Just thinking about the possibility of being in an SD situation will/can eliminate some of the stress when/if it ever occurs. Lots of folks don't think about it.

They figure shootin' an intruder would be easy. They never consider how they'll feel if they kill the intruder, what'll be going thru their head when they're standing over the lifeless body of a once living human being (and what if its a 17 year old kid)? Those who plan on actively defending themselves with a firearm better think about that and think about it hard. And they'd better be honest with themselves too; because if they don't have the will to kill and the ability to accept the consequences afterwards, in my opinion, they'd be better off with an escape plan than a gun.

Some will say - well OK but just having the gun might be enough. The mere presence defuses and causes bad guys to unass the area more often than not. True - but are you willing to BET your life and the lives of your family on that? Something to think about.

Long story short to use a lethal weapon, any lethal weapon in a defense situation takes a lot more than just having the weapon. It takes courage, determination, training and practice. Most of all it demands a willingness on the part of the defender to take a life and that my friend is no easy thing.
 
For now, it's enough to know that I can handle a gun. And maybe that confidence will be enough to save me, if that awful day comes. Maybe.

NO! It is not...
Enough that is...


I agree it is not nearly enough to have simply spent an hour shooting at a range.

In addition...there is no mention in the column that she even purchased a firearm at all.

I am happy that a convert may be in the making - particularly someone who writes a column twice a week in a major metro newspaper.

We, however, recognize she may be a long way from actually acquiring a suitable defensive firearm, training with it, and developing the mind-set that will allow her to defend herself should the need arise.

But at least she has begun the process.
 
Ahhh OK. Thanks for the explanation. So its in her thinking she can handle a gun after one time, like thinking you can handle a car after passing a test. It doesn't mean your a skilled driver and can handle the car, even though at 16 you might think you can! That lack of understanding and true handling ability gives a false sense of ability that can cause and lead to danger or harm! Makes sense! So some concern could be like the "don't threaten to use a bat bc if the intruder gets it, they might be more willing to use it and more skilled" sort of thing huh. Thanks!
 
Folks, she had one good experience, then she had to write about it. It's obvious from the article that she still knows that she hasn't figured it all out yet. That reflection will take time, especially for someone for whom gun ownership is a new and uncomfortable idea. That said, she appears to be working past some of her prejudices and telling others who might otherwise dismiss US, but might listen to HER. That's a good thing.

I don't think anyone (including her) thinks that she is ready to take on all comers. I'm sure that she's going to think about these things more in the near future, and may seek further training. The negativity I am seeing here is not warranted. If you will forgive the somewhat extreme metaphor, it's akin to screaming at an alcoholic that she's a failure because she's only been sober for a week. These are good steps she has taken, and likely to be followed by more if provided with encouragement.
 
I am amazed how many people are missing the point here. To me the article reminds me of when I first landed a airplane solo. I threw my arms up in the air and yelled[to no one] I DID IT! I did NOT assume I was ready for 50 MPH crosswind landings on a sand bar.The first time just makes you realize you can do it-the rest is polish.
 
That's a good point I didn't think of Jim.

It's been so long since I fired my first firearm that I forgot about the satisfaction I got from actually "doing" it.

Good point. See, even an old guy can learn something now and then. :)
 
No one's coming down on her Jim. We're all stoked she picked up shooting and perhaps she can "polish" it over time. However you didn't make the same "For now, it's enough to know that I can handle a gun/plane". comment. It's about a false sense of understanding. You wouldn't just assume you know enough about landing a plane because you did it once would you? Of course not, but it's a great start.
 
Every journey... first step and all that.

Good on Matthew and good on Nicole for taking that step, even with her one or two tweaks of the RKBA nose. Like most here, I certainly hope she never actually needs to use her newfound skill(?) and hope that she continues to train and practice, learning to enjoy it in an attempt to master this responsibility... and through her writing skill and publication, bring more members into the fold, be they male or female.
 
I think it's great that you are learning to safely handle and shoot a gun. NO one should have to live in fear of their life. North Carolina is very close to passing a Castle Doctrine law which will in essence make it legal for a person to shoot someone thru a closed door and/or does not have to retreat in order to protest theriselves. As long as you are in reasonable fear for your life you will be OK. Again I wish you the best and congrats.
 
Columnist said:
For now, it's enough to know that I can handle a gun. And maybe that confidence will be enough to save me, if that awful day comes. Maybe.

I am amazed how many people are missing the point here. To me the article reminds me of when I first landed a airplane solo. I threw my arms up in the air and yelled[to no one] I DID IT! I did NOT assume I was ready for 50 MPH crosswind landings on a sand bar.

But based on what she wrote; SHE DID. Assume that is. Granted she qualified her statement with maybe but it seemed quite half hearted to me.

And I do agree with you 100%, Jim. That it is a really good thing that a member of the media may be a convert and may help to convert others to our cause. But it's not a good thing if the people that read her article assume that with 1 or 2 hours of training/practice they're ready to defend themselves with a firearm as the columnist, in my opinion, did.

Words have meaning and the columnist chose hers poorly or more likely she chose them with purpose to give her story more impact. Either way she created a potential for some poor schmuck who took her words to heart to get hurt.

The first time just makes you realize you can do it-the rest is polish.

And that's a common sense approach that stands anyone with that attitude in good stead. But that's not what the columnist wrote. She stated she could handle a gun. To me that implied she could HANDLE a gun meaning she knew how to use one and didn't need to learn anymore. And that attitude is dangerous and she may not have imparted that to all her readers but she did to some I am sure.

Confidence if earned is a really good thing. Unrealistic confidence is not.
 
It's funny hearing the "Fear and ascribe morality to inanimate objects" crowd talk about firearms

Hoplo #1 - "I actually went SHOOTING! A HANDGUN even! I think it was a Glock or a nine millimeter or a forty five. It was so loud! I probably shot a whole CLIP through it!"

Me - "I'm carrying my sidearm now and I've probably dumped about 2500 rounds through it"

Hoplo #1 "OH THE WAILING AND GNASHING OF TEETH! WHY WOULD YOU EVER ACTUALLY CARRY A GUN! AND WHY WOULD YOU SHOOT IT SO MUCH"

Hoplo's Girlfriend "Wow, a real man that can actually protect me! You've even hunted large game before? Uhm... *slips piece of paper* *mouths* "CALL ME"

Sissy-men don't attract real women ;-)
 
I think what we have here is what I've always called "ignorance", not a genuine bias against guns...this gal.

Basically this gal kind a thought "well, it's not 1870, and we're not in Montana so who really needs a gun"? A lot of people are like that, they just don't understand.

She was willing to give it a try and seemed to enjoy it and said so. Here is somebody, regardless of whether or not she actually takes up shooting or not, is probably less likely to fully encamp with the antis.

I think this article was somewhat refreshing even if it did not break any major ground.
 
What "gym"? Was there a workout involved?
I think you will find that "he" is a she .... At least the name used is "Nichole".

Wow, haha. That's pretty funny. Total brainfart on my part. You got me.
 
Werewolf-
Then I went home and looked around. Where would I put a gun? Would my son be all right with it? Would I react quickly enough in crisis or be asking for more trouble?

I learned that between 2003 and 2007, 38 people in Washington state died in accidental shootings. I thought there might be more.
I can't get into the writers head, but I do not sense over confidence here. If anything, a realization she has a way to go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top