Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Compare frame size of S&W 686+ and Taurus 627

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Trifler, Aug 27, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Trifler

    Trifler Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Location:
    Renton (Seattle suburb), WA, USA
    Can anyone give me a size comparison between the S&W 686+ 7-shot and the Taurus Tracker 627 7-shot revolvers? I haven't been able to find any stores with either of these in stock to look. Taurus lists their 627 as a "Compact" frame while S&W lists their 686+ as a "Medium" frame. Their weights are listed about the same with only a 3 oz difference (40 vs 43 oz for the 6" versions).
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2007
  2. edhaus

    edhaus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    33
    The Taurus 627 in SS with 4" barrel lists at 28.8 ounces empty.
    The S&W 686 7 shot with 4" barrel is 38 ounces empty. This info is from there websites. I, too, am interested in these 2 revolvers and look forward to the comments that will come. Taurus also has a ported barrel.
     
  3. Brian Williams

    Brian Williams Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,846
    Location:
    Kampong Cham, Cambodia
    The Tracker or Compact frame is the same as a K frame, not an L frame.
     
  4. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,070
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    For a Taurus L frame equivalent, look at the 608. They're strong, reliable, well built guns. Actually, they're a little between an N frame and an L frame in size. They offer an 8 shot version. As stated, the trackers are K frame sized guns, better for hiking and totin' afield, but not as strong.

    http://taurususa.com/products/product-details.cfm?id=249&category=Revolver
     
  5. highfive

    highfive Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    363
    Location:
    Texas
    For me it looks like you are looking at these 2 revolvers based on the capacity. I have a Taurus tracker 4" in 357 and is the one I actually carry basically most of the time.

    When I bought it I was able to look at both (Cabela's Austin) and I went with the Taurus. First because I already have taurus guns and never had any problems with any of them. it was cheaper, lol And it actually feels real good in my hand. As for the sizes when you have both they're real close in size, I actually would say around the same but probably somebody will disagree with me. And the S&W is heavier. Both feel real good. It would be a one on one decision, tough one though, lol
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2008
  6. Haywood

    Haywood Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    669
    Location:
    N. Ohio
    I have a 608 and a 627. The 608 gets a little heavy when plinking. The 627 is my favorite of the Two. When cammping I have carried both IWB for short times. They are both 4".
     
  7. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,070
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    My own outdoor hiking 4" .357 is an older M66 six shot, works for me. They're very accurate weapons. the 66 in feel and look and everything external is a dead ringer for my old K frame M19 Smith and Wesson except it has an improvement I like, a round forcing cone (no flat spot at the bottom) and a little more space and beef in the frame there than the 19 had. That was a problem on the 19, forcing cones cracking at the flat part. I had it happen on me with a M10, only shooting .38 slightly +P! It had the pencil barrel and I got a 4" heavy barrel from gun parts inc and had a smith install it. It's been okay since. But, I've been leery of M19 forcing cones since that happened and I've read a lot more about 'em and the problems they had with police departments. The Taurus seems stronger in the forcing cone area, looks it anyway and doesn't have a rep for splitting forcing cones like the K frame Smiths did.

    Of course, if I wanted strength in the gun, I'd get a Ruger. Had a Security Six for a good while. But, this danged Taurus is so bloomin' accurate, I'll not sell or trade it away. Accuracy trumps all else with me in an outdoor revolver.
     
  8. Trifler

    Trifler Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Location:
    Renton (Seattle suburb), WA, USA
    The reason I looked at the Tracker over the 608 was because I didn't want to have to use moonclips.

    Taurus also has a Model 60 that appears to be virtually identical to their Tracker 627. Any thoughts on that?

    S&W's Model 620 is another 7-shot .357. It's only available with a 4" barrel, but it might be an option for those of you interested in a 4".

    Based on the comments it sounds like the Tracker 627 is easier to carry than the S&W 686+. Which is easier to shoot?

    Whatever I choose is going to be a bedside gun and a regular practice gun.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2007
  9. L-Frame

    L-Frame Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    479
    If it's a 7 shot, it's got to be closer to an L than a K frame. I just looked at my S&W 19 and there is no room at all for a 7th hole.
     
  10. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,070
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    If what you want is a bedside gun/practice gun, weight is your friend, not your enemy.
     
  11. Trifler

    Trifler Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Location:
    Renton (Seattle suburb), WA, USA
    I agree with you for the most part. It isn't weight I'm concerned with. It's frame size for my small hands.
     
  12. flashman70

    flashman70 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    246
    Location:
    Northern VA; 2nd home in SC
    I have small hands (esp. short fingers) and have no problem with my 686 w/ 4" barrel.
     
  13. Trifler

    Trifler Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Location:
    Renton (Seattle suburb), WA, USA
    That's good news. Just to confirm, that's the 7-shot version?
     
  14. flashman70

    flashman70 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    246
    Location:
    Northern VA; 2nd home in SC
    Yep.
     
  15. Redneck with a 40

    Redneck with a 40 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,273
    The Taurus Tracker is plenty strong, no doubt. My owners manual states that it is rated for 158 grain bullets at 1450 fps. I've never loaded my rounds anywhere near that, but that is what it says. I'd say its built closer to L-frame strength. A true K-frame would not withstand those rounds for very long at all.

    I've got about 1000 of my reloads through my tracker so far, 125 grain remington semi jacketed hollow point at 1350 fps, the gun is still very tight, extremely accurate. I think they are well built.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page