# There is absolutely no intention of terminating Gen3 production.
# Gen4 was developed because of perceived market demand; Glock does not see a real LE/Mil need for the Gen4.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=13&t=96805
# There is absolutely no intention of terminating Gen3 production.
# Gen4 was developed because of perceived market demand; Glock does not see a real LE/Mil need for the Gen4.
Blackhawk30: I'm confused.Is the RTF frame a Gen 4 or 3?
shooistpd27: Anyone who is a cop and has to wear the glock on his hip, does not want the aggressive grip. My forearm goes across my grip thousands of times a day. If Im wearing a uniformed shirt, it will get really fuzzy around my right forearm. If Im wearing short sleaved, I will have a permant rash. The slide looks great but the grip sucks, if you need sand paper to keep the pistol in your hand, you dont need a gun, you need a lifejacket.
Information is straight from Glock, Deutsch-Wagram, Austria.I have a hard time believing this
This could be like a vote of confidence for a baseball manager. "We are totally committed to ...# There is absolutely no intention of terminating Gen3 production.
# Gen4 was developed because of perceived market demand; Glock does not see a real LE/Mil need for the Gen4.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=13&t=96805
However, as inexpensive as Glocks are, they always hold their value for resaleThis is bad news, indeed. Our GLOCKS are NEVER going to increase in value!