Converted my Norinco T-54 from 9mm to 7.62 Tok...

Status
Not open for further replies.

lsudave

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2007
Messages
1,042
I just completed this little project, something I'd thought about doing but had never gotten around to it. Due to current ammo shortages and prices, I decided it was finally time.

Brief background- I have a Norinco T-54 that I got NIB at a gunshow decades ago; it was my first purchased handgun. It came in 9mm, has 9mm stamped on the slide. Has a 9mm barrel, the original magazines are fullsize Tokarev with spacers at the rear of the mag. This is different from the Model 213, which has a spacer in the magwell and smaller mags. The ejection port is large enough to eject a 7.62 casing easily, you can drop a full 9mm round in, it's not QUITE long enough to place a loaded 7.62 with bullet in unless you go at a slight angle.
The gun was imported by Sportarms Miami, Fl, the marking are nicely engraved, and not just a cheap stamp of dots.
The gun, as puchased, had the wraparound Tokagypt grips. Many years ago I replaced them with "correct" panels. A little over a year or so ago, I replaced them again, with a set of fairly crude handcarved Russian TT-33 wooden grips that someone on Gunboards had listed. They ain't Hogues, but they're attractive if you like wood, they're correct to the model, ... and I like 'em.

It retains the cheapo rear safety on the frame that was required by import. No big funky thing by the trigger like on the Polish or Romanians. As a lefty, those always bugged me.

I missed out on the ultra-cheap surplus ammo, by the time I started looking into a conversion to 7.62 it was still cheaper to shoot bulk 9mm. It kinda makes me cringe that I missed out, but no use crying over spilt milk, as they say. I remember looking back when we could still buy stuff from Canada (Marstar), at one point I was on the phone with them talking about ordering a barrel. I had this gun since I had dialup internet...

Anyway, I decided on looking into converting this again, due to current ammo shortages and prices. 9x19 is no longer 16-20 cents a round, and you're pretty lucky if you can find it for sale. Tokarev ammo is not cheap either, but it hasn't skyrocketed to the extent 9mm has. I think new manufacture had been going around 40 ct around... I came across some surplus for around that price.
*note: this isn't a "you should have bought more 9mm" reaction. I have several cases tucked away. I have a full case of Gold Dot, and plenty of range, both brass and steel, and I have aluminum too btw.
THIS is more of a "what if we don't see any 9mm" hypothetical... I have .45 acp, 9x18 Makarov, .32 acp. I DIDN'T have any Tokarev ammo or a firearm capable of shooting it. It DOES come and go, sometimes in bulk surplus. I decided I would add the caliber to the mix, in order to increase my odds of finding usable ammo.

Final notes- the Norinco seems to have been a solid interchange option. The external diameter of the 9mm barrel matches the 7.62 barrel I found (Hungarian, from Numrich). It did not come with a link or pin, but I had an extra 9mm barrel from somewhere in the past; so I took the pin and link from that. I did not need to change barrel bushings. I already had standard Tok mags, they run fine with either rd. Recoil spring was fine, extractor is fine. In order to swap from 9mm to 7.62 and back, all I need to do is remove the slide, swap the barrels, replace the slide. Accuracy- acceptable for me- standing at 10 yds, I could "group" into an ammo box without trouble. If there's a different point of aim between the two rds, I didn't notice it.
 
A couple images, if I can figure how to do this...



The last three images, I had 4 rds left, so I used the ammo box as a target at 10 yds. I aimed center of the box, as you can see I put all 4 on the right edge, about 1 inch or so to the right. 2 were very tight, 1 is a bit high, 1 about 2 inches low but inline with the others windage wise.

I have 52 yr old eyes so seeing the front sight blade is a pain now (I'm gonna paint it something flourescent); I USED to be able to see just fine doggone it!

But for me, I'm satisfied. I'm standing and shooting in a relaxed manner, not bracing on a rest, and shooting a gun I hadn't shot much in at least a decade. I'm comfortable I could hit center mass in a pinch if needed.
 
Some of the norinco 9mm had modified magazines that were reduced in rear to front length for the shorter 9mm round. More reliable. If you can find a barrel, the .38 ACP and 9mm largo might also work in a T-33 type of pistol. For what is a service pistol the type T-33 pistols are thin and readily concealable. I do not care for the safety protocol of it.
 
Some of the norinco 9mm had modified magazines that were reduced in rear to front length for the shorter 9mm round. More reliable. If you can find a barrel, the .38 ACP and 9mm largo might also work in a T-33 type of pistol. For what is a service pistol the type T-33 pistols are thin and readily concealable. I do not care for the safety protocol of it.
There were 2-3 types of Norincos in 9mm, as I understand.

I have the T-54, which is the one you refer to with an additional 38 barrel; my understanding is it's a 38 Super barrel. I think some were sold with all the barrels; 9x19, 38 Super, 7.62x25. Either Sportarms or Navy sold them like that. Mine came only with a 9x19. That variant is literally a standard Tok, but with the "made for USA" 9mm barrel. I received 2 mags that were standard length, but with a spacer inside to keep 9mms tight. Regular mags worked too, and worked fine for me. I never had a jam r/t things being a bit staggered inside the mag.

There is another, 213, where it's got a standard Tok frame, but has a spacer pinned inside the magwell. Those had the shorter mags you referenced. I think they also had shorter ejection ports.

I believe there's a 213 variant, with a smaller frame/magwell, that didn't have a spacer, but instead was simply made with a 9mm only magwell.

There's a rare doublestack variant, which is kinda a Tok version of a Hi Power.... literally a doublestack, SA pistol. I've seen photos, never saw one in person.

I don't know about the Zastava pistols, or the Hungarians (the other 2 that make/made 9mm variants). Some folks say the barrel diameters are different, etc, so you'd need to swap out bushings and such. But with the Norinco (Chinese), it is pretty clear (with mine) the 9mm is a straight conversion. You just swap out the barrel and you're good to go.
 
There were 2-3 types of Norincos in 9mm, as I understand.

I have the T-54, which is the one you refer to with an additional 38 barrel; my understanding is it's a 38 Super barrel. I think some were sold with all the barrels; 9x19, 38 Super, 7.62x25. Either Sportarms or Navy sold them like that. Mine came only with a 9x19. That variant is literally a standard Tok, but with the "made for USA" 9mm barrel. I received 2 mags that were standard length, but with a spacer inside to keep 9mms tight. Regular mags worked too, and worked fine for me. I never had a jam r/t things being a bit staggered inside the mag.

There is another, 213, where it's got a standard Tok frame, but has a spacer pinned inside the magwell. Those had the shorter mags you referenced. I think they also had shorter ejection ports.

I believe there's a 213 variant, with a smaller frame/magwell, that didn't have a spacer, but instead was simply made with a 9mm only magwell.

There's a rare doublestack variant, which is kinda a Tok version of a Hi Power.... literally a doublestack, SA pistol. I've seen photos, never saw one in person.

I don't know about the Zastava pistols, or the Hungarians (the other 2 that make/made 9mm variants). Some folks say the barrel diameters are different, etc, so you'd need to swap out bushings and such. But with the Norinco (Chinese), it is pretty clear (with mine) the 9mm is a straight conversion. You just swap out the barrel and you're good to go.
A 38 ACP chamber with accept dimensionally 38 super and vis versa. I do not know if the the T-33 design can tolerate the super loadings and so said 38 ACP. 9mm Largo will usually fit a .38 ACP chamber, but some 9mm largos will not accept the semi-rim of the 38 automatic rounds.
I have read that the point of impact changes with caliber conversions.
 
A 38 ACP chamber with accept dimensionally 38 super and vis versa. I do not know if the the T-33 design can tolerate the super loadings and so said 38 ACP. 9mm Largo will usually fit a .38 ACP chamber, but some 9mm largos will not accept the semi-rim of the 38 automatic rounds.
I have read that the point of impact changes with caliber conversions.
I think it's 38 Super, I remember the long-ago discussions on the durability of the Tokarev design. You might remember, there was a guy named Clark who posted on a lot of boards (and got banned on a few) who put in a lot of time pushing Toks to failure... and it took a LOT.

Way back when, it was considered that the CZ 52 was more durable than the Tokarev because of the delayed roller block action. Turns out, that was an internet myth, and the Browning-based design was a lot more resilient.

Regarding point of impact vs point of aim... I wish I could confirm or provide evidence. :(
This particular pistol, with the 9mm barrel, was a fricking point-and-shoot laser beam for me, when I was younger.
It seems the same with the 7.62 barrel, but my vision isn't what it was then. I used to see the front blade sharply, now I can't; everything swims around in a blur. Even with glasses. If I sat down with a bag, I figure I could dial it in more.
 
Another note, on this pistol... like I said, it was my first one. It has shaped my appreciation of firearms.

The actual gun itself has been very accurate and reliable. When I could see better o_O, and shot it often enough to be in good practice, I could shoot it as accurately as any pistol I have, and better than lots. It is made of attractively blued steel, it has a nice trigger, and as noted it is a slim and smooth pistol to carry.
  • I experienced firsthand, quite a few times, "gun snobbery" based on it being Chinese "junk". It was pretty satisfying to outshoot some of those guys.
  • it prompted me to explore the "duty gun" genre, and as a result I have a number of other such guns, as well as surplus
  • It might have been cheap and Chinese, but it was also nice blued steel, and I've always preferred that over polymer frames or ceracote coverings.
  • It's a nice introduction to the Browning/1911 design. If you can fiddle with the Tok, you can fiddle with a 1911. They're pretty close in design
  • For a fairly long while, it was my only pistol, and I understand fully the "fear the guy with just one gun" saying. I shot the heck out of that gun, and after awhile I got pretty durn good with it.
 
I think it's 38 Super, I remember the long-ago discussions on the durability of the Tokarev design. You might remember, there was a guy named Clark who posted on a lot of boards (and got banned on a few) who put in a lot of time pushing Toks to failure... and it took a LOT.

Way back when, it was considered that the CZ 52 was more durable than the Tokarev because of the delayed roller block action. Turns out, that was an internet myth, and the Browning-based design was a lot more resilient.

Regarding point of impact vs point of aim... I wish I could confirm or provide evidence. :(
This particular pistol, with the 9mm barrel, was a fricking point-and-shoot laser beam for me, when I was younger.
It seems the same with the 7.62 barrel, but my vision isn't what it was then. I used to see the front blade sharply, now I can't; everything swims around in a blur. Even with glasses. If I sat down with a bag, I figure I could dial it in more.
Just because pistol does not fail with a very hot load, does mean it is a safe practice. I am familiar with the name of Clark. Overloads in recoil operated weapons often stress the metallurgy from the impact of recoil. Perhaps there something magic in the T-33 design, but if it is me I would not go above the parameters of the original ammo. We know that standard 9mm is fine, +P+ 9x19 I would not do.
 
I don't anticipate converting to 38 Super; I don't have any of that available, or another gun in that chambering. ;)
Personally not very sure about what the gun can take, or not. Not a big expert on pressures, certainly not conversions...
Which round, 9x19mm 124gr or 7.62x25mm 86gr (in a bottlenecked cartridge), puts more stress on the gun, at different places? That's a question I can't answer, and would certainly like to learn. The recoil seems lighter with the Tok, but that's going from memory with the 9mm. I didn't have to change springs out.

Now, for sake of disclosure, 9mm Largo, if available, would be an interesting idea. I don't have any of that laying around either, but I do have an old Star Modelo B Super (again, in 9x19). The magazines for that, like with the Tok, are longer than ideal for 9x19; and again I've never ran into trouble shooting standard 9x19 from it. I'd assume the conversion of the Star to Largo would be a barrel swap, also. If I could pick up a couple barrels for existing handguns to convert, and they ran as hoped (meaning they run), that again would be an interesting option to pursue.
 
I don't anticipate converting to 38 Super; I don't have any of that available, or another gun in that chambering. ;)
Personally not very sure about what the gun can take, or not. Not a big expert on pressures, certainly not conversions...
Which round, 9x19mm 124gr or 7.62x25mm 86gr (in a bottlenecked cartridge), puts more stress on the gun, at different places? That's a question I can't answer, and would certainly like to learn. The recoil seems lighter with the Tok, but that's going from memory with the 9mm. I didn't have to change springs out.

Now, for sake of disclosure, 9mm Largo, if available, would be an interesting idea. I don't have any of that laying around either, but I do have an old Star Modelo B Super (again, in 9x19). The magazines for that, like with the Tok, are longer than ideal for 9x19; and again I've never ran into trouble shooting standard 9x19 from it. I'd assume the conversion of the Star to Largo would be a barrel swap, also. If I could pick up a couple barrels for existing handguns to convert, and they ran as hoped (meaning they run), that again would be an interesting option to pursue.
That star was originally in 9x23 largo. CCI used to load it in aluminum cases.
 
Sold my M57 cuz 7.62x25 was too expensive and hard to get.
funny how things work...

I can get more Tok ammo. It's more than I like, and more than I paid for the 9mm I have... but less than replacing that ammo would be right now. And if/when things return back to normal, if I want to shoot this gun affordably, I just drop the 9mm barrel back in.

I understand selling something, but I rarely sell any firearm, and I'm keeping this as it was the first one I bought.
 
Here's a little evidence of the 38 Super barrel. This was from an online auction for a Norinco T-54, came with multiple barrels.
20190323160142-5139.jpg

Note- it has the 7.62 barrel in place, and there's a 38 Super in view. There was also a 9x19 barrel in that listing.
 
Mine is the 213. It would be fun to have a conversion.

Tallball, either you have a mirror image of your gun, or it's VERY rare!

What is your mag situation? Small, so that 9x19 fits snugly inside? Or is there room for more (even if it has a spacer to take up that space)? That's the first part to look at. In looking, just using the eyeball gauge, I'd say you have the small magazines (noting how your baseplate doesn't seem to go back as far as the one in the picture I posted; which is how mine also looks).

If you do have the small ones, all may not be lost. Odds are, there's a metal spacer inside your magwell to the rear, held in place by a pin beneath the grips. If you drive that pin out and remove the spacer, your gun should be able to take standard Tokarev mags. I have shot 9mm out of those mags plenty of time, they stagger around but seem to feed fine.

Before you go into reconfiguring your 213, look at your ejection port. Both mine, and the one in the above photo, the port is long, and runs approx from the edge of the trigger, to the front of the trigger guard.
Mine will NOT eject an unfired round from the port, but will eject an empty shell casing.
 
Sold my M57 cuz 7.62x25 was too expensive and hard to get.
You weren't looking hard enough.

It does seem tho that any rimless semi-auto pistol caliber that costs more than 9mm that is smaller in caliber is instantly deemed "too expensive" but make it a 10mm or a .45 ACP and suddenly it's a fair trade. People seem to forget that the 7.62x25 is known to be able to defeat soft body armor and besides 5.7x28, no other mainstream semi auto is capable of doing that. Maybe there's some special .357 Sig or 9mm boutique ammo that can throw a super light bullet at high velocity and it costs $1.25/rd, but at that rate the 40 cent/rd 7.62x25 ammo costs a third as much and is much more available and is more proven.
 
You weren't looking hard enough.

It does seem tho that any rimless semi-auto pistol caliber that costs more than 9mm that is smaller in caliber is instantly deemed "too expensive" but make it a 10mm or a .45 ACP and suddenly it's a fair trade. People seem to forget that the 7.62x25 is known to be able to defeat soft body armor and besides 5.7x28, no other mainstream semi auto is capable of doing that. Maybe there's some special .357 Sig or 9mm boutique ammo that can throw a super light bullet at high velocity and it costs $1.25/rd, but at that rate the 40 cent/rd 7.62x25 ammo costs a third as much and is much more available and is more proven.
I mean I could get it but it had to be bought online and shipped in. Wasn’t worth it to me.

If I need to defeat body armor a.) I’m probably already screwed or b.) I’ll bring a rifle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top