rscalzo
Member
The stats stated Crimes After Issuing.
They don't state Misdemeanors, nor does it state what is required for revocation? There is a vast difference in the definition of a Crime and Misdemeanor in most states. In the NY Post article (another rag one step up from the Inquirer) have cited as sources minor drug use. Banned, yes. Would possession of a joint result in the revocation of a FL CWP? If not, the stats are, as I stated meaningless. You also cite a reference using one year of statistics. It was well known that those requites would be trouble before they were hired. But yet you cite ten years of stats in Fl and one year in NYC. Think maybe Fl had a run or two of anomalies in their stats.
You are using a bias sample to prove a point which doesn't wash.
They don't state Misdemeanors, nor does it state what is required for revocation? There is a vast difference in the definition of a Crime and Misdemeanor in most states. In the NY Post article (another rag one step up from the Inquirer) have cited as sources minor drug use. Banned, yes. Would possession of a joint result in the revocation of a FL CWP? If not, the stats are, as I stated meaningless. You also cite a reference using one year of statistics. It was well known that those requites would be trouble before they were hired. But yet you cite ten years of stats in Fl and one year in NYC. Think maybe Fl had a run or two of anomalies in their stats.
You are using a bias sample to prove a point which doesn't wash.