Hmm, considering Freud is the most influentual researcher of human psychology in history, who would you suggest is better?You really should use someone that carries more weight than Freud though...
You should consult the psychologists today about that...on the order of none or very few of his theories are even looked at now. All thrown away because they aren't falsifiable and thus not scientific. Freud is only influential in getting people interested in the field, not to the actual field.Hmm, considering Freud is the most influentual researcher of human psychology in history, who would you suggest is better?
Reworked into a more solid scientific discipline possibly, but thrown away? Not quite. His scientific method certainly left much to be desired, but many of the basic concepts he articulated are still used to today. It's understandable that as the field matured, the theoretical and philisophical aruguments that Freud made for his theories would be rejected. But to claim that he wasn't the most influential researcher of human psychology is a little disingenuous.All thrown away because they aren't falsifiable and thus not scientific.
Your letter spacing is much too tight in the lower headline.