Cutting vintage S&W for moon clips- heretical or practical?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I may be wrong, my knowledge Is very limited but unless I’m mistaken, and I may be, if you have a 25-2 chambered in 45lc you have a very rare gun, to be honest I’m not sure they even made such a thing. If it is I’d say it’s likely worth double a 25-2 in 45acp, possibly more.

I have to ask, are you sure it’s not 45acp?
Ya, clearly says .45 Colt Ctg. on the barrel. Has the long cylinder too.
 
As much as it pains me to say it......
Go for it! It's still capable of shooting 45 Colt so what's the harm?
Of course I would do my homework as to the rarity of that chambering as mentioned in a previous post before I cut it.
Hell you may be able to flip it and buy 2 of what you actually want.
 
Ya, clearly says .45 Colt Ctg. on the barrel. Has the long cylinder too.
FWIW: The 45acp also has the long cylinder. When I decided I wanted a 25-2 45acp gun I was broke and I watched hundreds of them sell on gun broker before I finally bought one a couple years later and I never saw a 45lc.

But like I said I’m far, far from an expert. But if you do get it you should definitely do a little research and find out for sure what you’ve got.
 
I wondered about that when I saw that the interchangeable cylinder revolver on the cover of the '81 Gun Digest had fixed sights. I'll have to try to dig it up and see if they remark on that.
But even just changing loads with the same cartridge can cause a fairly significant sight change requirement. When I retired my 610 from my USPSA revolver shooting 180 gr bullets going 950 fps to 200 gr bullets going 1250 fps as a hunting revolver that change required a significant sight change. That's why the sights are adjustable. If you know your going to go back and forth between loads write down the change.
 
If it is marked 25-2 I would letter it before I cut it.
But that would be betting the cost of the letter against the chance of a rarity.
Maybe just a mismarked -5 which would be of little collector interest.
So, you got me lookin closer......

It definitely isnt a -2, and it isnt pinned. Ill have to see the gun in person, but it looks like actually a -4 ? Still no MIM or lock, though.
 
You could tailor your loads to match your sights between the .45 ACP and the .45 Colt. If you gun will primarily be used for a .45 ACP load or brand of ammo then tailor a .45 Colt load to the point of aim with your revolver.
 
25-4 is a commemorative with .45 LC in short ACP cylinder. As is -3, I forget which is fancy and which is plain.

S&W always seem to bring up surprises when it comes to Model numbers. From what I understand with the Model 25 series, the even dash numbers are chambered in 45 ACP while the odd dash numbers are chambered in 45 Colt.

Guess I need to go check the "Standard Catalog of Smith and Wesson" and see what it says.

Edit with additional information...

The Model 25-4 is indeed a commemorative model chambered in 45 Colt with the short cylinder. The Model 25-3 also has a short cylinder and was chambered in 45 Colt but Lew Horton had about 100 built in 45 ACP.

The odd/even dash number convention seems to have started with the Model 25-5 and beyond.

Ya learn something everyday.
 
Last edited:
Will 45 Auto Rim not seat correctly? That would seem the way to go but maybe I am misunderstanding something?
Cutting the shape of the moon clip into the cylinder face but leaving a lip to support the .45Colt rim doesn't leave room for the .45AR rim. However, cutting the cylinder face for the moonclip to seat flush leaves a sufficient gap for the .45AR rim but doesn't leave a lip for the .45Colt rim to headspace on. You can have .45ACP in clips and .45Colt (no .45AR) or .45ACP in clips and .45AR (no .45Colt). See post #7 for details.
 
Last edited:
So, Ive got a line on an immaculate M25-2 in .45LC for a good price, but Im not a fan of the cartridge, nor do I want to stock yet another caliber in my depot if I can help it.

I am, however, sitting on copious amounts of .45 ACP and even a few boxes of .45 Autorim (for my Dads M1917).

Given the current (and future) ammo shortages, would this be prudent or just........ wrong........... to deface such a nice old revolver?
I like the alternative cylinder option already stated.

As to the .45 AR - I'd hang onto that against the possibility of stumbling across a shaved Enfield.

Todd.
 
So, turns out it was actually a late-production Dash 5, the seller had mislabelled it.

Got there today and (of course), it was sold- this despite the fact that I had offered to put a down-payment on it yesterday and the seller declined. I think he realized after talking to me that he had it under valued. :fire:

Oh, well thats the breaks.:confused:
 
Well, the M25 was a bust- but now Im seriously thinking of having my 686 cut for 9mm moon clips.......:)
I've been coping with an itch to get it done to my 66 since passing on a TRR8 that was just a bit out of reach.

I dig the notion of a relatively modern carry/combat-revolver and full-moon clips and a chamfer. I'm a klutz with speed loaders.:evil:

That TRR8, you could all but *throw* the clip at the cylinder - SWEET!

Todd.
 
Long skinny .38s in thin clips are not the asset that short stubby .45s in heavy gauge clips are. The technique is different. BTDT.

That is why you use short cartridges in your 38 for fast reloads. I am running some fairly hot 38 Short Colt in my 627. I use exactly the same technique to reload my 627 as I do my 625 or 610. No difference, except I pull the trigger two more time before I do it. My 38 Short Colt load is slightly shorter than my 45 ACP. Unlike my women I like my revolver cartridges short and fat. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top