CZ P01 vs. CZ 75 D PCR

[SSN Vet]

Only difference I see is ...

P01 has rail

PCR has "snag free" rear sight

PCR list for ~ $30 less.

Is that it, or is there something else I'm missing? (springs, etc...)

Can these CZ's with the frame mounted decocker be carried cocked and locked? (I've never fired a DA/SA pistol, not quite sure why some can't and some can).

Please enlighten me.

 

[armoredman]

Have both, like both. As you say, the biggest differance is the light rail. Also, the PO1 has slightly differant metallurgy, and was NATO accepted. I find both to be equally usefull, and the best handguns I see available today.

Note, the decocker models cannot be carried cocked and locked. For that you will need a CZ-75 Compact, available in 9mm or 40S&W.

 

[Gary G23]

P-01 has a forged alloy frame.
PCR has a cast alloy frame.

 

[rough rider]

so which one would you say is more durable and would stand up to more abuse?

 

[nonquixote]

Theoretically the forged frame of the P-01 should be stronger than the PCR's cast frame, but I guess the PCR's frame is still plenty strong enough. As a long time moderator at CZForum I've never heard of a single frame failure with either pistol.

FWIW, I am not an accessory user so I prefer the PCR's sleeker muzzle for concealed carry.

 

[12 Volt Man]

both are fantastic guns. The PCR would be the better carry choice if you don't need attachments on the front of your gun. I have a P-01, which I'll never sell, but I don't need the accessory rail. Plus I like the back sights better on the PCR
both would be extremely durable