bannockburn
Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 26,297
Dibbs
Amen to that...Lest we forget!
Amen to that...Lest we forget!
...He didn't talk about it much though...
So far I have only seen cnn and cbs totally ignoring D Day.
Sad that i find only 2 as being acceptable. They are trash.
I had another great uncle that served in the Navy in the Pacific. He was on a ship that got torpedoed and was in the water for quite some time before being rescued. He never told anyone about that until he opened up to me after I had gotten out of the Army in 1996. The whole family was shocked to not only hear what he went through but that he finally opened up after all those years. My Uncle that served in Vietnam hasn't ever said much even to me. I know the feeling since I don't say much when my kids ask me about my service. That is why I always listen to and am willing to talk to any fellow combat vet no matter when they served.
I'd highy recommend reading Stephen Ambrose's book D-Day
https://www.amazon.com/D-Day-Illustrated-Climactic-Battle-World/dp/1476765863
I did, and I will offer my recommendation as well. Ambrose has been maligned quite a bit (and deservedly so) in academic circles for some sloppy historianship and research practices, but it's still a great book (I don't recall if these problems had to do with this book or others).
Yeah, Texas only had 14" rifles (14"45 Mk VIII), but ten of them, and near shot the liners out (max 90 rounds per each). And was hit by German 20cm fire (one live, one dud) in return.the others were lesser calibers. Nothing to sneeze at though.
No, it was Undaunted Courage. He got caught plagiarizing the work of some other historians (I forget who, but it was 2-3 different people). In his defense, it may have been unintentional. His research assistants (his adult sons) apparently did not keep very good track of the sources for all of their research notes, and they ended up using other people's words in the book. It doesn't make the book inaccurate, but, as you stated, it was sloppy work, which is unacceptable from such an accomplished historian; it's a rather high school level mistake to make.
By the way, the proper term for "historianship" is historiography.