Damage to DHL airliner hit by missile(s) near Baghdad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Preacherman

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
13,306
Location
Louisiana, USA
For those who are interested, here's an e-mail about, and some pictures of, the damage caused to a DHL Airbus A300 by a missile strike as it left Baghdad. It's pretty amazing that the crew managed to land it at all! (Oh - for those who look for the gun relationship, I think a missile fired in a combat zone is just as deadly as a gun, if not more so! :p )
DHL A300B4 Missile Damage Photos

To those of you who are wondering what happened to the German DHL A300B4 coming out of Baghdad last Saturday, take a look.

The United States has heavily contracted with DHL to fly cargo into Iraq, due to the worldwide shortage of US Air Force Cargo aircraft. The large number of DHL aircraft flying military supplies into Baghdad gave ample targets to the guerillas. Aircraft was hit at 8000 FT by two SA7 SAMs, lost ALL hydraulics and therefore had no flight controls, actually did a missed approach using only engine thrust and eventually (after about 16mins) landed heavily on runway 33L at Baghdad. This was fortunate because with no steering the aircraft veered of the runway to the left, had they landed on 33R veering to the left would have taken them straight into the fire station.

The aircraft then traveled about 600 metres through soft sand taking out a razor wire fence in the process, see LH engine pic, and came to rest almost at the bottom of the sloping area between the runway and a taxiway. on the razor wire.

All three crew evacuated safely down the second slide, the first one tore on the razor wire.

I flew in with a team on Tuesday in one of our Metros and some special equipment we'd had made locally in Bahrain and some provided by Airbus. Using a USAF D9 Caterpillar pulling a 100 metre cable fitted to the back end of each bogie and a nice new aircraft pushback tug with a towbar on the nose gear, we were able to remove the aircraft just on dusk on Tuesday night and towed it to an Iraqi Airways graveyard on one side of the terminal.

We stayed overnight in the USAF camp on the airport and went back to the aircraft on Wednesday morning to allow the insurance survey to be completed and then secure the aircraft.

Basically, LH engine rotates in a fashion, has ingested lots of razor wire and is knackered. RH engine has seized, probably from ingesting loads of sand at maximum reverse thrust and inlet cowl has unacceptable lip damage, probably from hitting the razor wire fence posts.

The bulk of the damage is the LH wing. About 3 metres of rear spar is missing in front of the outboard flap, the wing has bulged upwards and downwards where the initial explosion appears to have occurred, one O/B flap track is hanging in the breeze and one has a small piece of flap still attached, the rest of the flap is nonexistent. The pics show the huge crack that has occurred to the rear spar inboard of where the spar has burnt away, possibly from loads on the wing during the landing process. The front spar appears to be intact.

The point of entry pics show where a projectile entered Tank 1A, which was full of fuel, and, after it ignited, proceeded to burn away at the spar. The fuel tank ribs in the area directly in front of the O/B flap are burnt almost 50% through.

The crew obviously did a fantastic job in getting the aircraft back on to the ground and one can only assume that it was most fortunate that they were not aware of the state of the wing as they could not see it from the cockpit.

It also says a lot for the structure of the aircraft that it withstood the impact of the (whatever is finally determined to have hit it).

I'm sure there will be lots of other photos and videos flying around the net, but at least these ones are genuine.

The worst part for us was the airport was shut down on Wednesday and we had to be driven in an armour-plated Landcruiser Troop Carrier from Baghdad to Balad, 60 miles to the north, from where we flew back to Bahrain in our Metro again.

I trust you will all appreciate just how lucky these guys were.

Regards,

(Name deleted)

DHL International Aviation, Bahrain.


attachment.php
 
Good job Flight Crew! Looks like they put it down out in the middle of nowhere too. Bonus points for putting an airliner down outside of pavement.


(*remembering soft field landings and simmed engine out landings back in the Cessna*)
 
Simply brilliant stickwork. No hydraulics, wing on fire, they bring it in safe and walk away while doing no real new damage, esp. to ground facilities. 'Cept for screwing up a fence. AFTER an initial flag-off and re-run at the strip.

Folks, the rules say that's just not possible...that level of control sans hydraulics is...unearthly.

If those guys ever get work in air passenger service, they can fly me any day. In anyTHING.
 
Just idle curiousity, if the missle was a heat-seeker I wonder why it hit the wing & not an engine.

I would really like to see more of the aircraft in order to be sure, but the wing and forward section of the fuselage look a lot like a 707. If so, that would mean the damaged area of the wing is the port-outboard engine mount.
 
German DHL A300B4

not a 707

The promity fuse would probably take it near the engine(which it looks like it did)

Plus, this may be way off I remember hearing about how commercial airliners actually have a fairly weak IR from their engines but for whatever reason their wings show up quite hot. This is just what I heard somewhere awhile ago, so it might just be FUD.

But most missiles work off proximity fuses so a direct hit isnt common
 
Airbus

This airplane was an Airbus A300B4-203. The registration is OO-DLL so it based in Brussels.
 
Jim's correct regarding the "Brilliant Stick Work" comment...

I'll bet that both pilots were yanking & banking with all their strength.
When I first took instruction about half a century ago, I can remember the one thing my grizzled old instructor told me NEVER to forget. "DON'T give UP"!!!! Even if you're on fire and the nose is pointed straight down at the ground, keep your hands on the stick and keep trying to get the airplane to fly.
Where's Sam anyway? He'll back me up on this.

KR
 
If there is a correlation with the DC-10 Sioux City crash, then with no hydraulics they wouldn't have had any flight controls at all. Therefore they would have been flying with only engine thrust, and no stick work. I guess the groundwork set by Capt. Haynes from flight 323 payed off! On the other hand, iif someonme could tell my if there art mechanical backup systems in an A300 I would most interested.
 
I agree with Jim, the pilot and crew did a wonderful job landing a damaged plane......after being hit by a rocket. Thank heavens no one was hurt. I take my hat off to the pilot and crew. It's a shame the airliner didn't have a few rocket pods strapped to it's belly. They could have at least fired a few back at the BG's.;)
 
"I'll bet that both pilots were yanking & banking with all their strength.
When I first took instruction about half a century ago, I can remember the one thing my grizzled old instructor told me NEVER to forget. "DON'T give UP"!!!! Even if you're on fire and the nose is pointed straight down at the ground, keep your hands on the stick and keep trying to get the airplane to fly.
Where's Sam anyway? He'll back me up on this."

It's still rule number 1

pittspilot, CFI-MEI

I don't know if I buy the complete hydraulic failure bit. It's really only happened once, and we know the result on landing. That's not to say that Captain Haynes and crew did not do a phenominal job. How they even made it to the end of that runway still baffles me. However, if they would have had to go around, they would never have pulled it off.

I think this crew had a modicum of control. I am not sure it would have been possible to do this type of landing without any hydraulic systems. Naturally the crew deserves all possible bonus points for putting down the aircraft with such little damage.
 
Wow. Airbus if I recall are fly-by-wire aircraft. So they could yank the controls as hard as they want, would make no difference. The 'computer' had some job to do, in concert with the humans flying it. And we think that the Warthog owns the 'I can fly with no wings or engine - label.'

On the other hand the German Post Office must be pissed, since it owns DHL, and the German govt. owns a significant number of Deutsche Post AG, still.
 
A while back, there weresome pictures posted here of a female USAF Captain's Warthog (A-10) That had taken some fire over Bagdhad.

Shot up the leading edge of the port wing and 1 of the engine nacelles pretty good. She limped it back without power steering and salvaged the bird.

Pretty impressive airmanship, although because she was one of those "evil" pilots whoo were bombing women, children and small house pets, the media pretty much buried the story. Not a peep.
 
hops
Wow. Airbus if I recall are fly-by-wire aircraft. So they could yank the controls as hard as they want, would make no difference. The 'computer' had some job to do, in concert with the humans flying it.
I believe not all are FBW (fly by wire). Found a great site when I first started reading this thread which has a forum where they were talking about just that. Had to go to work and didn't have time to post it though. Will have to take a look and see if I can find that post again.
Ah, found it. They said the A300's and A310's are not FBW. It's just a forum (which seems to be populated by industry pro's and mechanics) but they seem to know their stuff.
Airliners.net
 
Pittspilot!!!

I almost forgot about you! You back in Louisville for good? Or are you just going to take the plane and your guns back to Florida? Hey how many guns will FIT in a Pitts, anyway? :)
Every winter I tell myself that I'm going to load up my best guns and go on down to Florida and spray some south Florida vegetables--but I never do.

Will (KR)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top