As a Brit, I'd like to say thanks for the sympathy expressed.
I'm a collector of anything to do with Sig-sauer, pistols and assault rifles, and have an interest in early 20th century automatics, all unfortunately de-activated. As you can imagine I baulk at what we have to pay to get a lump of metal that can't even fire blanks. Part of the cost is the deactivation itself - it varies from £70-100 ($120-180) - yup they charge a lot to screw things up! There is a similar situation in Europe but at least some of the countries there do allow (live) gun ownership while Switzerland, as you know, dishes an assault rifle out to each male citizen, all of which carry out national service.
At present it looks like de-activated weapons will be safe for the time being in the UK. Other than pistols and machine guns (with bipod), pre-1995 (Hungerford massacre) automatic weapons are the ones us collectors go for as they're the least damaged. Post-1995 are completely welded and utterly useful, only good for dummies who like pretending to be soldiers in their bedroom or as a wall display. Kalashnikov 47/AKM/74's are thus useless but nonetheless still sell for £200 ($350) while the ban has pushed the price of pre-1995 de-acts up to £600-800 ($1000-1500). The stupid thing about it is that I can pick up an illegal live Chinese AK47 for £100 ($180) - go figure.
However, the banning of toy guns has gone ahead which means that little joey, aged 5, can't play with his little cowboy cap gun in public without the possibility of having his head blown off by the Armed Response Unit.
It seems that our police force (in the main, as there are still a few good officers out there) can't tell the difference between a real gun and a toy. Fair enough in the dark but surely they'd notice the lack of bullets being fired! Anyway, it hasn't stopped them shooting innocent members of the public carrying a chair leg. Even running away from a police officer will get 7 bullets pumped into one's head nowadays.
To cap it all off, a law (I forget which one) was passed lately in Parliament stating that carrying an item deemed to be an offensive weapon in public is also illegal. This includes, for example, knives and billhooks, but would also include forks, spoons, keys, pencils, fist, knee, etc., if used as an offensive weapon. Bit of a bummer if you need to defend yourself against an assailant. With regard to the latter I'm sure acting in self-defence is covered but I suspect you'll still get prosecuted for turning an innocent item into a weapon. The law hasn't been tested but judging by the increase in "little Hitler's" within the UK's judicial system it would not surprise me if they made an example of someone.
The one over-riding travesty about the recent gun law changes is that it has stopped law-abiding UK citizens from owning guns for self-defence and sport. Indeed it has gone further by making illegal anything that even looks like a gun.
One thing has resulted from this and one thing hasn't.
The one thing that has resulted is that more people now have a growing fear of firearms through lack of information. Most stupid people demonise the unknown and firearms have become part of that. There is unlikely now to be any proper educational resource available for the use of guns outside the heavily restricted gun clubs. By the same degree the lack of firearms as an everyday tool has allowed for their glamorisation, particularly by film and television, resulting in gangs (invariably ethnic) and loony indiviudals taking them up (note that I exclude those few that genuinely need some form of weapon to defend themselves).
The one thing that hasn't happened is the decrease in gun crime. Indeed, it is at it's highest level on record in the UK. Hmmm, I wonder if the authorities will ever figure that banning guns that don't fire won't stop the use of illegal firearms that do fire!!
Oh, one final thing, if anyone has any Sig-sauers.....
Cheers.