nygunguy
Member
Dear Sean and Alan
Sean and Alan:
Last night I heard both of you express outrage over Ronald Dixon being prosecuted for defending his
home and family with a weapon. The fact is that Mr. Dixon violated a fundamental law in New York
State that criminalizes the possession of a handgun without a permit and that specific gun being
registered with the state. I've heard, that in New York City, the common citizen cannot get a permit
unless they are among the elite or well connected. Mr. Dixon's attempt to register his weapon would
probably have been denied.
What about the thousands of "other" Ronald Dixons in New York, who illegally possess handguns (in
their homes) for the sole purpose defending themselves and their families? Are you (and the other Fox News analysts) going to pick up their cause and express outrage at the plethora of gun laws that criminalize them? Will Mr. Dixon's case and your subsequent outrage cause you to use your media access to take a truly fair, balanced and in-depth look at the impact of guns and gun control on our society?
Opportunity knocks for the Pro-gun Lobby. Mr. Dixon could become the poster person for those who
believe that the antigun lobby is now doing harm to our society by restricting the natural right of honest, peaceful people to defend themselves and their property.
I'm hoping that Mr. Dixon is prosecuted and found guilty under New York gun laws. I hope that his
case finds its way (through appeals) to the highest court possible. I hope that that court is forced to
provide a ruling on whether a constitutionally defined militia conscript's (Mr. Dixon) 2nd Amendment rights were violated when he was prosecuted for securing his small piece of the free state.
Sean and Alan:
Last night I heard both of you express outrage over Ronald Dixon being prosecuted for defending his
home and family with a weapon. The fact is that Mr. Dixon violated a fundamental law in New York
State that criminalizes the possession of a handgun without a permit and that specific gun being
registered with the state. I've heard, that in New York City, the common citizen cannot get a permit
unless they are among the elite or well connected. Mr. Dixon's attempt to register his weapon would
probably have been denied.
What about the thousands of "other" Ronald Dixons in New York, who illegally possess handguns (in
their homes) for the sole purpose defending themselves and their families? Are you (and the other Fox News analysts) going to pick up their cause and express outrage at the plethora of gun laws that criminalize them? Will Mr. Dixon's case and your subsequent outrage cause you to use your media access to take a truly fair, balanced and in-depth look at the impact of guns and gun control on our society?
Opportunity knocks for the Pro-gun Lobby. Mr. Dixon could become the poster person for those who
believe that the antigun lobby is now doing harm to our society by restricting the natural right of honest, peaceful people to defend themselves and their property.
I'm hoping that Mr. Dixon is prosecuted and found guilty under New York gun laws. I hope that his
case finds its way (through appeals) to the highest court possible. I hope that that court is forced to
provide a ruling on whether a constitutionally defined militia conscript's (Mr. Dixon) 2nd Amendment rights were violated when he was prosecuted for securing his small piece of the free state.
Last edited: