Delaware Homeowner takes out two armed burglars

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
5,687
Location
Delaware home of tax free shopping
Man confronts intruders, killing 1Homeowner says men fired at him

The News Journal/BOB HERBERT New Castle County Detective Franklin Robinson points out a bullet hole Thursday in Roselle.



Stephen L. Norwood

By TERRI SANGINITI
The News Journal
11/11/2005
A 60-year-old avid sportsman turned the tables on a pair of armed men Thursday by returning their gunfire, killing one of them after they broke into his Roselle home in the middle of the night, police said.

Police said the pair ambushed the man and fired at him sometime after midnight in his dining room at his home near Elsmere.

After the exchange of gunfire, the two ran out of the victim's Woodward Avenue home.

Advertisement
The homeowner, Thomas Morganstern, who was not struck by either of the two bullets fired at him, shot at the intruders with a handgun, police said. Authorities released the homeowner's name after deciding he would not be charged with a crime.

Morganstern called 911 at about 12:30 a.m. to report a burglary with shots fired. He was unaware at the time that he had shot the intruders.

County officers with K-9 dogs arrived to search the neighborhood. Officers were able to follow a trail of blood to a detached garage next to the man's home where they found Cleveland Richardson, 28, of the 500 block of N. Harrison St. in Wilmington.

He was bleeding from a gunshot wound to the abdomen. He was taken to Christiana Hospital and was reported in good condition Thursday after surgery.

Officers, however, could not find the second man, later identified as Stephen L. Norwood. They stopped the search due to rain and resumed at daybreak.

County police Cpl. Mark Tobin and his K-9 partner, Nike, found Norwood's body at about 8:45 a.m. underneath bushes across the street from the Morganstern's house. Norwood, 26, of the 1800 block of Faulkland Road in Prices Corner, was pronounced dead at the scene.

Area resident John Olah said he was in a rush to get to work Thursday morning and didn't pay attention to the search. But when he returned home at 10 a.m., he found a search centered in his rear yard.

"I found out that somebody's dead in my backyard," Olah said.

Norwood had suffered gunshot wounds to the torso and arm. A handgun was recovered near his body, Navarro said.

Richardson faces charges of first-degree attempted murder, first-degree burglary, possession of a firearm during a felony and conspiracy, Navarro said.

Area residents say they understand their neighbor's action.

Gretta Talamini and her grandmother Elizabeth Jankowski, 86, said their neighbor was a good man who recently lost his wife.

"It's a very quiet neighborhood," Jankowski said. "I think anyone would be concerned about what happened. I certainly don't want it to happen again. Apparently, he was defending himself."

Investigators later discovered that the men had first broken into the Morganstern's garage, found the keys to the car and home and got into the house through the back door.

After questioning Morganstern, detectives learned he was awakened by the intruders when they came into his bedroom on the second floor. They ran off when the man woke up. Before running downstairs, Morganstern armed himself with a handgun. When he reached the bottom of the stairs, the intruders tried to ambush him, Navarro said.

"The intruders shoot twice and the victim returns fire in the direction of the muzzle fire and flash light and hits both men," Navarro said. "One got out the front door and the other ran out the back door. The victim retreated to his room to call police."

Navarro was unable to confirm Thursday if Morganstern legally owns the guns in his house.

Elsmere Police Chief Neil Strauss said there have not been any similar break-ins in the area.

"We're basically familiar with the two of them," Strauss said. "But we don't have any burglaries with the method of operation like they did last night."

According to court records, Norwood was convicted in Sept. 2003 of disorderly conduct. He pleaded guilty on Aug. 24, 1998, to possession and use of a controlled substance. He also pleaded guilty June 8 of that year to second-degree burglary, theft under $1,000 and receiving stolen property.

Richardson was convicted in 1996 of carrying a concealed deadly weapon, terroristic threatening, possession and use of marijuana and criminal contempt, according to court records. In 1997, he pleaded guilty to possession of a deadly weapon by a person prohibited. In 2001, he was convicted of first-degree reckless endangering and endangering the welfare of a child, and criminal mischief.

Staff reporter Sean O'Sullivan contributed to this story. Contact Terri Sanginiti at 324-2771 or [email protected].

Note the reporter injecting a litt;le antigun bias by asking the police spokesman if the homeowner owned his handgun legally:rolleyes:
 
Good Job by him. I can't beleive they said that he could get charges files for this. It was clearly a self defense case.
 
actually, a really good shoot. High stress, hits both men under fire. I'm impressed. Notice that both perps were preconvicts, and were already "illegal" to own....

This is a good shoot, both for the guy, and for the broader issues at hand. Goodguy needs gun to prevent criminals from killing him, proves the case for legitimate defense, especially in the wake of what happened in San Fran. Goodonhim.
 
Buy him a beer.:D

Why is the word "Advertisement" there like a Sunday afternoon infomercial???

Leave it to a reporter to ask if he "Legally owns the guns in his house". First off who cares, and secondly they saved him, his belongings, and helped Darwin with his theory.
 
The intruders shoot twice and the victim returns fire in the direction of the muzzle fire and flash light and hits both men," Navarro said. "


Those of you who like lights on your guns take note of how a flash light and muzzle flash allowed th homeowner to see and hit both crimminals.

Interesting huh????
 
Navarro was unable to confirm Thursday if Morganstern legally owns the guns in his house.
What kind of crap is this.Man protects himself and some joker wants to know if he legally owns the GUNS in his house.
 
"The intruders shoot twice and the victim returns fire in the direction of the muzzle fire and flash light and hits both men," Navarro said. "One got out the front door and the other ran out the back door. The victim retreated to his room to call police."

Righteous, truly righteous.

According to court records, Norwood was convicted in Sept. 2003 of disorderly conduct. He pleaded guilty on Aug. 24, 1998, to possession and use of a controlled substance. He also pleaded guilty June 8 of that year to second-degree burglary, theft under $1,000 and receiving stolen property.

Richardson was convicted in 1996 of carrying a concealed deadly weapon, terroristic threatening, possession and use of marijuana and criminal contempt, according to court records. In 1997, he pleaded guilty to possession of a deadly weapon by a person prohibited. In 2001, he was convicted of first-degree reckless endangering and endangering the welfare of a child, and criminal mischief.

Well, yeah, but they were good boys!

Oh, well. At least one of them has probably seen the error of his ways.
 
Boy, that's some training for ya. Hits both and didn't even know it. I can only hope to achieve that kind of guts if that ever happens.
 
chris in va said:
Boy, that's some training for ya. Hits both and didn't even know it. I can only hope to achieve that kind of guts if that ever happens.
I shoot IDPA and IPSC and feel comfortable with a gun, my goal would be to handle myself without s*#ting myself. Maybe the reporter wouldnt notice.:eek:
 
Master Blaster said:
Those of you who like lights on your guns take note of how a flash light and muzzle flash allowed th homeowner to see and hit both crimminals.

Interesting huh????
A fair point.
Biker
 
Why is the word "Advertisement" there like a Sunday afternoon infomercial???

That's an easy one. The online newspaper, like the ded-tree version, has ads. When you copy-and-paste the story, sometime you pick up the little label below the display ad that identifies it as such.

No biggie.
 
I am surprised the newspaper account was as unbiased as it was. I was expecting something along the lines of "Two innocent persons shot down in killing spree by mad dog gun crazy fascist hunter."

I also noted the business about the light. Back in the dark ages, I was taught to hold the light in the left hand, up and ahead of the body. The idea was that an opponent would assume the light was in the right hand and fire to the left of the light, missing the light holder.

But I was taken severely to task by several gunzine experts who assured me that my tactics were out of date and that the place for a light was on the gun, which should be held directly in front of the body in a two-hand hold. That means that any shot directed at the light hits the light holder in the head or center mass. I am glad to have been corrected, since I always considered it a good idea not to be shot, but I guess that is old-fashioned thinking and it is now OK to take a bullet in order to conform to the ideas of the armchair experts.

Jim
 
Hats off to Mr. Morganstern. Good guys 1.5, Bad guys nada.

We need to find that mans address and send him a beer. Actually that would be pretty funny, him receiving several hundred packages, each with a beer inside and a note; "Good Shootin'".

Jubei
 
Aside from the BS about whether or not the good guy was legal, was anyone else bothered by the part about the police deciding they could "out" the good guy once they decided they weren't going to charge him?

What kind of "protection" is this? If you're going to be charged, they keep your name confidential but if you're free and clear, they release it so all the punks' associates know exactly who to go gunning for.

Sheesh.
 
Master Blaster said:
After questioning Morganstern, detectives learned he was awakened by the intruders when they came into his bedroom on the second floor. They ran off when the man woke up. Before running downstairs, Morganstern armed himself with a handgun.

note that the intruders left and the man pursued. he shot them in an exchange of fire after they left him. his use of the phone in an upstairs room indicates that he did not need to confront them to call for assistance.

i am not arguing the reasonability of failure to retreat, but am noting that he could be the stiff in the slab, rather than one of them.

don't think i would pursue two aware, armed men with anything less than superior firepower.
 
Jubei said:
Hats off to Mr. Morganstern. Good guys 1.5, Bad guys nada.

We need to find that mans address and send him a beer. Actually that would be pretty funny, him receiving several hundred packages, each with a beer inside and a note; "Good Shootin'".

Jubei

:) I'm sure he would appreciate it. I could give you the address, but I don't think that is such a good idea on a public forum.

Just waiting to see if one of our scum bag Wilmington lawyers will take up the case of the poor misunderstood perps viciously shot by racist home owner.
 
chris in va said:
Boy, that's some training for ya. Hits both and didn't even know it. I can only hope to achieve that kind of guts if that ever happens.

When I lived in South Florida, there was a case where two guys had tried to ambush, well, the wrong guy at an ATM. Turned out he was FBI, excellent shot, nailed them both with his concealed Glock, both fatalities.

Always like hearing stories like that...and like this one. Good for him!

Did he own his guns legally...geez! Way to make a hero have some tarnish, reporter. Yes, I'm sure most 60-year-olds get filed-off-serials weapons from their local fence like the criminals do! :scrutiny:
 
Jim Keenan said:
But I was taken severely to task by several gunzine experts who assured me that my tactics were out of date and that the place for a light was on the gun, which should be held directly in front of the body in a two-hand hold. That means that any shot directed at the light hits the light holder in the head or center mass. I am glad to have been corrected, since I always considered it a good idea not to be shot, but I guess that is old-fashioned thinking and it is now OK to take a bullet in order to conform to the ideas of the armchair experts.

Heh heh. I figure if I'm awakened in the middle of the night by someone breaking in, my eyes are pretty well dark-adapted. That plus I prefer a shotgun for home defense, and any perp who doesn't wet themselves and take off when they hear an 870's slide racking...

I always sort of figured high-lumen lights under the rail are best for an entire SWAT bunch of yelling guys with full vests and helmets who just need to be able to absolutely identify threat vs. nonthreat before shooting?
 
Manedwolf said:
I always sort of figured high-lumen lights under the rail are best for an entire SWAT bunch of yelling guys with full vests and helmets who just need to be able to absolutely identify threat vs. nonthreat before shooting?


+1

And....if you use the light that's attached to your gun to identify your target and it's a friendly, then you've just covered Grandma who got up to pee, with your gun. Hope she ain't the skittish type. Kinda the same principal as not using the scope on your hunting rifle to glass for prey. That's what binoculars is for.
 
justashooter said:
note that the intruders left and the man pursued. he shot them in an exchange of fire after they left him. his use of the phone in an upstairs room indicates that he did not need to confront them to call for assistance.

i am not arguing the reasonability of failure to retreat, but am noting that he could be the stiff in the slab, rather than one of them.

don't think i would pursue two aware, armed men with anything less than superior firepower.

Mr. Morganstern armed himself and proceeded to secure his home from intruders. True that he could have been the one laid out, but sitting in his bedroom waiting for the police to rescue him wouldn't guarantee his safety as well. I applaud him for taking the fight to them. Besides, to my way of thinking, his (assumed) training, alertness and courage provided him with superior firepower.

Jubei
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top