Hornady verus Dillon
Goose 5:
I have owned and loaded on both the Hornady LNL, and the Dillon XL 650.
Both machines can load a lot of ammo quickly, however they both have there own quirks. The Hornady's case retaining spring around the shell plate is an almost constant source of annoyance; this spring will come apart as you are using the press. It can be screwed back together but you must remove all the cases in the shell plate that are at various stages of assembly. I've tried using super glue to hold this spring together (suggested by Hornady's technical staff) didn't work. If you use a lock out die on your press another little problem arises. After you place a bullet in the case mouth, you must keep a finger on the case so it will enter the seating die and not fall out of the shell plate. The shell plate retaining spring dips down at this point and does not keep tension on the case in the shell plate. The case feeder assembly constantly needs to be re-adjusted, as it comes out of alignment easily. The LNL requires a shortened seating die that will not hit the case ejection spring; if the die hits the ejection spring you cannot complete the stroke. You can remove the ejection spring but then you have a progressive machine that doesn't auto eject the completed round. Hornady's dies have this shortened seating die other die manufacturers do not. "The press uses all standard 7/8 x14 dies" yes it does as long as you have the seating die shorten at a machine shop. The last thing about the LNL is the case feeder is loud, and will not feed the last six of so cases. A small point but valid.
The Dillon XL650 has two annoying points; both are in regards to the primers. Primers will jump out of the spent primer cup and bounce on the floor, not all the time but enough to be really annoying. Secondly if a case fails to feed into the shell plate, thus producing a empty space in the shell plate, a primer is fed and when not used dropped to a ramp to be collected and reused, which at time lets the primer hit the floor (this ramp is referred to as a ski jump by 650 owners ).
Both of Dillon’s problems are easily cured as listed on many posts on the web.
Bases on the problems that I have experienced with the Hornady LNL, I have sold that machine and have kept the Dillon 650. Keeping alignment of systems such as the case feeder is a none issue with Dillon, the locator buttons are a must better system (in my opinion) that the shell plate retaining spring.
If you load a multitude of calibers the Hornady is a must cheaper investment over the Dillon. However I have always believed that expensive is cheap, and cheap is expensive. Good luck with your decision, I just felt you should have information from someone that has owned and used both machines.