Yesterday I posted a poll that asked, "Which pistol make would you most like to own? (You don't have to own it already.)" The poll results, as well as some posts in the thread, seem to indicate a desire of individuals to diversify their gun collections. Regarding a recent purchase, one person wrote, "There are other nines I could have chosen, but I like the fact that not everyone else at the range has one. It's different than what everybody else has."
I personally feel the opposite about my firearms. I prefer to own guns that the military and police currently use, and that many other people are likely to own, such as the AK (foreign military), AR (U.S. military), Mossberg 500 (military and police), Sig P226 (U.S. Navy SpecWar), Sig P239 (Dept. of Homeland Security) and Remington 700 in .308 (military and police) to name a few. I like the idea that parts and accessories for my firearms are widely available and reasonably inexpensive, and that there are many different options for each gun.
Do you prefer to diversify your collection? Or do you prefer to standardize your collection? And why?
I personally feel the opposite about my firearms. I prefer to own guns that the military and police currently use, and that many other people are likely to own, such as the AK (foreign military), AR (U.S. military), Mossberg 500 (military and police), Sig P226 (U.S. Navy SpecWar), Sig P239 (Dept. of Homeland Security) and Remington 700 in .308 (military and police) to name a few. I like the idea that parts and accessories for my firearms are widely available and reasonably inexpensive, and that there are many different options for each gun.
Do you prefer to diversify your collection? Or do you prefer to standardize your collection? And why?