Do you test fire your self defense fire arm after cleaning it?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Losing the front suspension at highway speeds with my family in it could be pretty serious.
It may be a bad example, true.

But really,its just mechanics. Some people can do it effortlessly...and some people should pay to have their oil changed.
 
No. First, I'm fairly certain I can put the 5 pieces my SD weapon breaks apart into back together again. Second, you can test fire all day long and still not know if you've got a dud in your gun.
 
I cycle my revolver with dummy rounds to make sure they work, making sure to see the firing pin pop through the frame with each trigger pull.

If so, the gun is working. No need to test fire. :cool:
 
What other machines do you take apart and put back together and not test when you're finished? When you change your oil don't you start up the car and check for leaks, oil level, etc?
Another straw man.
I do a leak check because I have seen oil leaks...a few times in 40+ years. And in all honesty, because someone pinched an o-ring, or far more likely, failed to tighten the filter or the drain plug. Human error.
I have never seen any of my handguns, rifles, what-have-you mysteriously stop working after a cleaning.

I made my living as a wrench-turner on airplanes for a lot of years (military and civilian) and oh, by the way, part of the maintenance instructions was to do a leak check. So I did it.

Those were the employer's rules, and were largely to protect against human error. I understand that, as I saw guys who would forget to re-install a drain plug or fail to re-connect an oil line and burn up a 1/2 million dollar engine. Thanks to the union, all of them kept their jobs :barf: Some of them burned up more than one engine. Some of them are probably still burning up engines.

For a number of years, I did my own work on all my motocross and later, road race motorcycles. In between races, major work was not unusual, including motor work. Wheel and brake swaps were a regular occurrence. No time for an ops check? No problem. Grid 'er up and go full blast into Turn One with forty other guys....many of whom are also doing their own maintenance between races too.

The consequences of failing to do any of that work correctly are not pleasant to consider...and yet, I am still here. Nearly 60 years old, I still ride every day of the year, and still do my own maintenance. Yep, I take a quick look under the bike after an oil change, more out of habit than anything else.

I am not saying that I am above making an error...if I were to leave a part out of my pistol during cleaning, then that would be a problem. I don't lose sleep over that hypothetical. I still work on my bikes, jump on them and go for a ride (although Turn One is a memory...)

BTW..."Trust but verify" is for the work of others.
Myself..it is just "trust".
Sound like misplaced self-confidence? Perhaps one day I will come to regret that.

If I cannot clean and re-assemble my 1911, S&W revolver or Kahr pistol without leaving out a part, i am an idiot, and deserve whatever ills befall me.
You can have my widow place it on my headstone...."He screwed up. I collected the insurance."
 
If I cannot clean and re-assemble my 1911, S&W revolver or Kahr pistol without leaving out a part, i am an idiot, and deserve whatever ills befall me.

The time I found a problem after cleaning it was because I put the recoil spring in backwards in my Karh PM45.

I guess that makes me an idiot. :rolleyes:

I still haven't heard a half decent reason for me to not to test fire after a disassembly.
 
Losing the front suspension at highway speeds with my family in it could be pretty serious.
It may be a bad example, true.

But really,its just mechanics. Some people can do it effortlessly...and some people should pay to have their oil changed.

Keep in mind that this is not about "right or wrong" here. It's about people doing a risk assessment and determining whether or not they feel there is a need to perform some sort of risk mitigation.

The typical handgun is not an extremely complex mechanical device, especially when all most people do is field strip them for cleaning. There are only so many pieces and so many ways in which they can be reinstalled upon assembly.

But there ARE things which can cause malfunctions. I believe someone earlier mentioned installing a slide spring backwards. Not a difficult mistake to make, but one that could cause reliability issues you wouldn't want to deal with in a self-defense scenario.

It's not hard to notice dirt or foreign material in a gun...but unintentionally introducing a tiny foreign object could likewise cause malfunctions.

If you feel no need to function test after cleaning your carry weapon, more power to you. I, for one, have never done so either, though this is because I do all my cleaning at home and I can't exactly walk outside in town and burn through a couple magazines in the back yard. I've never had any reliability issues, either. But I can see the value in this.



No. First, I'm fairly certain I can put the 5 pieces my SD weapon breaks apart into back together again. Second, you can test fire all day long and still not know if you've got a dud in your gun.

Test firing your weapon after cleaning is to verify the handgun functions properly, not the ammunition. Presumably you already know if the ammunition you typically carry is reliable in your handgun.

A dud round is a fault that isn't related to disassembling/cleaning/reassembling your handgun.

:)
 
I dont want to sound like a wiseguy but, would you test fire a cartridge after handloading it, to be sure it would perform when you need it?
Most people I know of do cycle reloaded hunting ammo through their gun before taking it in the field. And clearly you test new loads that you work up.

Now that I'm thinking about it, it probably isn't the worst idea to check your premium defensive ammo to be sure every round cycles. Flaws do get through.
 
I do a function check after reassembly. Army habit. I usually clean at home, so while there's some good food for thought here, a function check is as good as I'm usually going to get.

As the guy said after jumping off the skyscraper . . so far, so good!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top