Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws

Discussion in 'Legal' started by TimRB, Jan 12, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TimRB

    TimRB Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    922
    Location:
    CA
    Just on the offhand chance that it has not been posted here before:

    http://www.dsgl.org/default.htm

    A good read, and almost certainly NOT what you'd expect.

    Tim
     
  2. K3

    K3 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,508
    Location:
    Looking through the scope at a coyote
    Indeed.

    I saw 'sensible' and almost didn't open it. I hate that word now.

    Glad I read through that email chain.

    Edit: This was wrong though:

    An M14 sure as hell wasn't designed to wound. Ain't sure a .308 fit's that bill.
     
  3. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    I guess I am confused why someone would post misleading information about doctors in a thread where a doctor's group was actually supporting the 2nd Amendment.

    Did no one even check out the link posted by the OP?
     
  4. 7.62X25mm

    7.62X25mm member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    313
    "Sensible" should make a huge red flag go up.
     
  5. XavierBreath

    XavierBreath Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,054
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Before this gets to far off topic with old internet chestnuts, have any of you gone to the Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws website and read any of the essays? You might be surprised.

    Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws was founded by gun owning physicians to counteract and refute the anti-gun activists in their professional organizations.

    From their website:
     
  6. ReadyontheRight

    ReadyontheRight Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,335
    Location:
    Minnesota - nine months of ice and snow...three mo
    Good point. It is an excellent organization. I love it.

    I just had to respond to the argument with the FACT that gun/bullet accidents are rather rare in the USA - especially when compared to another industry that applies potentially dangerous solutions to protect and help people.

    If I am attacked, I want a gun. If I am sick, I want a doctor, healthcare and medicine (like surgery or chemo-therapy). Both guns and healthcare have the potential to kill me, but for both, I need it when I need it. One is villified, one is lauded. That is illogical.

    And no matter how you measure it..the lauded one kills more people by accident.
     
  7. XavierBreath

    XavierBreath Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,054
    Location:
    Louisiana
    I assume you mean physicians when you say lauded. Actually, according to multiple polls, the public trust in physicians ranks right above that of career politicians and lawyers.

    Why? Because their professional organizations and educators have sold them out to special interest groups like the Brady Campaign. This is/was a group of physicians who have been fighting that. Unfortunately, they have not been as active as they once were. I have to wonder if that is due to gun owners villifying them simply because they were doctors. After a while, you just get tired of it and want to go shoot and enjoy life instead of struggling to save those who will not listen.

    Life has the potential to kill you ReadyontheRight.
     
  8. ReadyontheRight

    ReadyontheRight Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,335
    Location:
    Minnesota - nine months of ice and snow...three mo
    Isn't that a good thing?

    I personally laud (is that a word?) physicians. They spend $$, time and reputation to put themselves out on the line and help people every day.

    As I said above, the OP's link is just great. I love this organization's mission. Unfortunately, they apparently did not think about the Public Relations implications and they chose the unfortunate use of the word "sensible" in their name. Sometimes us Marketing Geeks can be worthwhile.

    And yes. Life is dangerous. Both guns and healthcare can help make it less so - usually at a calculated risk. But I rarely see gun manufacturing, shooting or industry professionals calling for civilian limits on access to the medical industry. "Sensible" or not.
     
  9. wuchak

    wuchak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    596
    Location:
    Shawnee, KS
    "Isn't that a good thing?"

    I think the statement about their public trust rating was intended to show that they are barely trusted more than the lowest two forms of life on the planet. Saying your just above a politician or a lawyer is like being told the good news is you don't have AIDS or terminal cancer, it's just leprosy.
     
  10. XavierBreath

    XavierBreath Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,054
    Location:
    Louisiana
    The founders of Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws chose their organization's name over a decade ago. The term "sensible" was seen as being in opposition to "radical" back then, not as a type of creeping incerementalism it is seen as today.

    Again, read the articles they published. Not all physicians think the same nor do they all subscribe to the party line of their anti-gun professional organizations. DFSGL was formed to get physicians out of the politics of guns, not to put them there.
     
  11. TimRB

    TimRB Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    922
    Location:
    CA
    "Unfortunately, they apparently did not think about the Public Relations implications and they chose the unfortunate use of the word "sensible" in their name."

    I think they probably used that word specifically *because* it has come to mean "draconian" as regards gun laws. My initial reaction was the same as K3's; I don't know why I actually went to the web site anyway, but I'm glad I did.

    I posted the link because it has some solid arguments against common anti-gun positions, and we need to have those in the back of our mind when we encounter (and discuss guns with) antis.

    Tim
     
  12. withdrawn34

    withdrawn34 Member.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Messages:
    529
    Wow, I have to admit that I had stumbled across the website long ago, but quickly left as I had made the assumption that we all had when we saw "sensible."

    Looks like I was quite mistaken. I guess what turned me off is the way I found it - via Wikipedia's list of gun control organizations.
     
  13. Titan6

    Titan6 member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,745
    Location:
    Gillikin Country
    Both my dentist and (ironically) our vet are shooters and hunters. They both gun and reloading mags in their waiting room. The dentist has a 15 point rack up in his exam area.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page