Here is the relevant law:
USC 18.922(r):
USC 925(d)
IRS Code 5845(a)
27 C.F.R. § 478.39
Emphasis mine.
Note the use of the word "identical", not "substantially similar to".
Therefore:
Because no stock SKS exists that has a detachable magazine and a pistol grip, shouldn't adding these features not violate 922(r), because no stock SKS exists in that configuration?
Because no stock Saiga-12 exists that has an ACE folding stock and Tapco pistol grip, shouldn't adding these features without playing the 10 parts game not violate 922(r), because no stock Saiga-12 exists in that configuration? It would be illegal to assemble a Saiga-12K in the US from original factory parts, because it has a pistol grip as manufactured.
In conclusion, doesn't 922(r) only apply to assembling firearms inside the US that are banned from import and using the original factory parts to do so?
Or am I totally off base?
USC 18.922(r):
(r) It shall be unlawful for any person to assemble from imported parts any semiautomatic rifle or any shotgun which is identical to any rifle or shotgun prohibited from importation under section 925 (d)(3) of this chapter as not being particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes except that this subsection shall not apply to—
(1) the assembly of any such rifle or shotgun for sale or distribution by a licensed manufacturer to the United States or any department or agency thereof or to any State or any department, agency, or political subdivision thereof; or
(2) the assembly of any such rifle or shotgun for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.
USC 925(d)
(d) The Attorney General shall authorize a firearm or ammunition to be imported or brought into the United States or any possession thereof if the firearm or ammunition—
(1) is being imported or brought in for scientific or research purposes, or is for use in connection with competition or training pursuant to chapter 401 of title 10;
(2) is an unserviceable firearm, other than a machinegun as defined in section 5845(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (not readily restorable to firing condition), imported or brought in as a curio or museum piece;
(3) is of a type that does not fall within the definition of a firearm as defined in section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes, excluding surplus military firearms, except in any case where the Attorney General has not authorized the importation of the firearm pursuant to this paragraph, it shall be unlawful to import any frame, receiver, or barrel of such firearm which would be prohibited if assembled; or
(4) was previously taken out of the United States or a possession by the person who is bringing in the firearm or ammunition.
IRS Code 5845(a)
(a) Firearm
The term ''firearm'' means (1) a shotgun having a barrel or
barrels of less than 18 inches in length; (2) a weapon made from a
shotgun if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less
than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in
length; (3) a rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16
inches in length; (4) a weapon made from a rifle if such weapon as
modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel
or barrels of less than 16 inches in length; (5) any other weapon,
as defined in subsection (e); (6) a machinegun; (7) any silencer
(as defined in section 921 of title 18, United States Code); and
(8) a destructive device. The term ''firearm'' shall not include
an antique firearm or any device (other than a machinegun or
destructive device) which, although designed as a weapon, the
Secretary finds by reason of the date of its manufacture, value,
design, and other characteristics is primarily a collector's item
and is not likely to be used as a weapon.
27 C.F.R. § 478.39
rifles or shotguns.
(a) No person shall assemble a semiautomatic
rifle or any shotgun using more
than 10 of the imported parts listed in
paragraph (c) of this section if the assembled
firearm is prohibited from importation
under section 925(d)(3) as not being particularly
suitable for or readily adaptable to
sporting purposes.
(b) The provisions of this section shall
not apply to:
(1) The assembly of such rifle or
shotgun for sale or distribution by a licensed
manufacturer to the United
States or any department or agency
thereof or to any State or any department,
agency, or political subdivision
thereof; or
(2) The assembly of such rifle or
shotgun for the purposes of testing or
experimentation authorized by the
Director under the provisions of
§ 478.151; or
(3) The repair of any rifle or shotgun
which had been imported into or assembled
in the United States prior to
November 30, 1990, or the replacement
of any part of such firearm.
(c) For purposes of this section, the
term imported parts are:
(1) Frames, receivers, receiver castings,
forgings or stampings
(2) Barrels
(3) Barrel extensions
(4) Mounting blocks (trunions)
(5) Muzzle attachments
(6) Bolts
(7) Bolt carriers
(8) Operating rods
(9) Gas pistons
(10) Trigger housings
(11) Triggers
(12) Hammers
(13) Sears
(14) Disconnectors
(15) Buttstocks
(16) Pistol grips
(17) Forearms, handguards
(18) Magazine bodies
(19) Followers
(20) Floorplates
Emphasis mine.
Note the use of the word "identical", not "substantially similar to".
Therefore:
Because no stock SKS exists that has a detachable magazine and a pistol grip, shouldn't adding these features not violate 922(r), because no stock SKS exists in that configuration?
Because no stock Saiga-12 exists that has an ACE folding stock and Tapco pistol grip, shouldn't adding these features without playing the 10 parts game not violate 922(r), because no stock Saiga-12 exists in that configuration? It would be illegal to assemble a Saiga-12K in the US from original factory parts, because it has a pistol grip as manufactured.
In conclusion, doesn't 922(r) only apply to assembling firearms inside the US that are banned from import and using the original factory parts to do so?
Or am I totally off base?