Does anyone ccw a colt 1903 pocket hammerless

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
115
I always liked the looks of the old colt 1903/1908 pocket hammerless pistols and then I finally got to hold one a couple of months ago and I must say I have never had a pistol fit my hand so well. I think that from holdling it I can honestly say I like it better than anything else on the market today its right up there with the 1911 for me ( interesting that all of my favorite guns are JM Browning designs) and im actuallly cosidering fixing one up for a carry gun has anyone ever carried a 1903/08 as a ccw.
 
Years back, very often. In fact I had one when I think drawing it from a coat pocket prevented me from getting mugged. As so often happens as soon as the potential mugger discovered his probable victim was armed he departed the scene in a mighty quick hurry.

There may be some issues. Those made before 1922 (.32=#422000/.380=#66000) do not have a half-cock/safety notch on the face of the hammer, so if the hammer fails to hold at full-cock it will go all of the way down. About the same time an inertial firing pin system, similar to that in the Government Model .45 was incorporated. For this reason many old timer's would carry older pistols with the chamber empty and chamber a round as they drew.

Older magazines sometime crack on the back where the lips are formed. Frequent eyeball inspection is called for.

Given the age of even the latest of these pistols, it's a good idea to replace the recoil, magazine and firing pin springs if you are going to use or carry one.

That said, they are a classic pocket pistol with a reputation for reliability (the round is guided into the chamber by built-in cartridge guides, not just the magazine lips), and excellent accuracy.

Finding a good holster may be a problem. I suggest a personal message to one of our fellow members - user name : Robbt.
 
Last edited:
Used to be pretty often, as you can see by the wear on the ankle holster, but it hasn't been strapped on the last two weeks as I'm trying out a S&W 3913NL in a simlar holster. The Colt was well worn, but well kept, when I got it, so I figured it wouldn't hurt it to carry it.:)
DSC05339.jpg
[/IMG]
 
No, but I would. Honestly, this is a pistol that I would like to see made again, with updated sights, and in both .32 and .380. I know Colt made a similar pistol in .380, but I would just like to see it made again.
 
I have a very early Type I, made in 1904 that's off getting some work, including some real sights. Should be back in about a month. I can't wait to have it back. Nice little pistol.

-Matt
 
I can only wish I had the chance to carry one of those beautiful little guns. As it is, I'm stuck with choosing between the HK P7 and the Browning Hi-Power. That said, it is you, sir, that I envy. Best,
JD
 
I agree, I always thought that with todays technology they could make the same gun chambered in 9mm which would be perfect but you can only dream. C&S makes a bigger 45 acp version but its just not the same.
 
I did some years ago before the advent of the small 9mm's and the even smaller .380's. I carried a number of high quality small, flat autos then. The only one I liked better than the Colt was the Remington 51. Both point quite naturally, which kinda makes up for their miniscule sights.
 
I carried my circa 1922 manufactured Colt M1908 in .380 ACP for some time until my original magazine broke. I could not find a reliable aftermarket mag that I had confidence in so I shelved it. I had a 1903 .32 ACP barrel and mag and was able shoot both calibers out of one gun.

Regarding holster, I searched for a good while to find a holster for my Colt. I ended up having a custom leather IWB holster made which was great. No pocket carrying of this piece as it is to large for my pockets.

Great design.
 
I agree, I always thought that with todays technology they could make the same gun chambered in 9mm which would be perfect but you can only dream

At least to some degree, Kimber must agree with you because the first thing that I thought about when I saw the new Kimber Solo is that it had a lot of styling cues taken from the 1903.
 
Some years back, before it was strictly legal in Texas to concealed carry, I often had a Colt 1903 with me.

Long story, but one day on the way to work I was involved in a quick-stop hold up. Three guys.
No shots were fired but I felt seriously under-gunned with the little .32. When I got home I traded in the Colt for my GI 1911 45.

But mostly I don't see anything wrong with carrying the Colt if the chances were pretty slim that you would ever have to use it.


My Wife's and my 1903 Colts.
Hazels32Colt.gif

Bucks32Colt.gif
 
If I could find one in good condition at a reasonable price, I wouldn't mind carrying it around. As an alternative, I have an FN Browning 1921, which has a slightly longer barrel, and holds 9 +1 rounds of .32ACP.
 
I've got one and have carried it on occasion but it's not my EDC.


1903.gif



It's well suited for the purpose but I prefer something a little more modern in a bit more potent of a caliber.


Still I never felt naked and vulnerable with it, I am very accurate with it and it's never given me any troubles.
 
Keep them chamber empty if you are going to pack them.

It somewhat depends on when it was made, (See post #3).

Those made before 1922 (.32=#422000/.380=#66000) do not have a half-cock/safety notch on the face of the hammer, so if the hammer fails to hold at full-cock it will go all of the way down. About the same time an inertial firing pin system, similar to that in the Government Model .45 was incorporated. For this reason many old timer's would carry older pistols with the chamber empty and chamber a round as they drew

It is advisable to replace the firing pin spring in post 1922 production, and earlier ones can be changed so the firing pin is the inertial style. Also you can change hammers and sears to gain a half-cock notch on the hammer face - if you can find the necessary parts. Without these improvements they should unquestionably be carried with an empty chamber.

Last but not least, it is unwise to carry any handgun in the waistband without a holster of some kind.
 
My wife sometimes does. She swapped to some oddball compact police BHP from FN now, but before that the 1903 was in her purse, usually.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top