Does everyone use this method for measuring groups?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Redlg155

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
2,725
Location
NW Florida
Fellow Shooters,

I've pretty much always measured the entire group size when figuring out a group. Nothing scientific, just if it all fit within a 1" square I called it a 1" group. Perhaps I've been short changing myself! :D

Anyway..I've done some cuttin n pasting from this site. http://proveit.www8.50megs.com/measuring/measuring.html Does everyone use this method?

The best way to measure groups that I'm aware of is the caliper attachment sold by Sinclair for about $50. You can get a usable dial caliper from Enco for about $15. Of course not everyone wants to spend $75 just to measure groups, so here is the method that I recommend. A dial caliper makes things easier, but a precision ruler will work fairly well also.

What we want to determine is the center-to-center distance between the two farthest shots of each group. The method here is to measure the maximum distance between the outer edges of the two farthest shots and then subtract the diameter of a single bullet hole, which gives the center- to-center distance.

First, turn your target over and push the jagged parts of the paper around the hole back to their original positions as much as possible. Turn the target back over and notice that the holes look rounder and are more well defined.

Second, you need to determine the typical diameter of a bullet hole. The bullet hole is rarely as large as the bullet, and its size varies depending on the ammunition used, the thickness and type of paper used for the target, the target backstop, and other factors. Actually, what is usually measured isn't the hole, which is often jagged and irregular, but instead the ring of fouling that is left by the bullet as it passes through the paper. This ring is usually the most consistent feature of the bullet hole, but you can base your measurements off whatever you like as long as it is consistent. Dirty ammo makes for the easiest groups to measure. I've seen rings as small as .18", so don't assume that your holes are .22".

Find an individual bullet hole and measure the diameter of the fouling ring as shown below. Measure a few other holes and take the average of the measurements. This is the typical bullet hole diameter. If you are such a good shooter that you don't have any individual holes, you'll need to remember to shoot a few into the sighter box so you'll have something to measure.



holesize.jpg


Third, find the largest distance that you can measure on the group. Measure to the same feature on the holes or fouling rings that you used to measure the size of the individual holes. On round groups it may not be obvious which two holes are furthest from each other, so make as many measurements as necessary to make sure you have the largest distance.

ODtoOD.jpg

Finally, subtract the typical bullet hole diameter from the overall group size to get the center-to-center distance. Round to the nearest hundredth and write this number above the group.


final.jpg


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good Shooting
Red
 
Yes, center to center. Good paper helps and wadcutters make nice holes.

Some people, I won't say who, would just measure the small cluster and not count the single hole off by itself. :)

John
 
That's a whole lot of words to explain it, but, yes that's pretty much how I measure groups. In the example given, however, I would normally have eliminated the subtraction step and measured from the outside of the group to the closest edge of the individual hole.
 
Center to center of the farthest holes. I don't get that technical though. I just eyeball it with my ruler or caliper. I'm not all that concerned whether the group is 2.2" or 2.3". 2-1/4 is close enough ;)

Dave
 
Speaking of "some people"... :D Some people will measure their best group, say 3 shots in a cluster out of 5, and say groups size .xx" 3+2. To me that is cheating! My best group .000" 1+1 :D
 
The method here is to measure the maximum distance between the outer edges of the two farthest shots and then subtract the diameter of a single bullet hole, which gives the center- to-center distance.
Why not just measure the the outside edge to the inside edge of the two farthest holes? :confused:

Unless you are keyholing (or they are all touching, which never happens to me :( ), I can't see how the result would differ.
 
Shucks. I just compare the group size to a dime, and if it's larger, stomp away in disgust.







;)

John
 
Shucks. I just compare the group size to a dime, and if it's larger, stomp away in disgust.

It's probably a good thing you don't shoot .50 Cal eh? Your first shot would be close to the size of a dime! :D

Actually I've always wondered how folks took into account for larger calibers. It would seem that shooting a .17 HMR you could get a super tiny group. With a .45 LC it would be harder to measure due to the size of the bullet. Heck with 5 shots of .17 HMR you could get a group the size of a 9mm bullet. You already blew that one with the first .45 shot! :D I would think that's where measuring the diameter of a single hole and subtracting the difference would allow you to adjust for bullet size.

Good Shooting
Red
 
DMK,

Because if you shot a group with a .22 that had the same center to center placement as a group with a .45, the .22 group would be automatically the smaller group with your method. Indeed, the .22 group could be actually be larger (center to center) and still be considered a tighter group than the .45 group. That's why center to center measurements are used.
 
Because if you shot a group with a .22 that had the same center to center placement as a group with a .45, the .22 group would be automatically the smaller group with your method.
:confused: I don't see how. The inside of the one hole would offset it by the same amount as the outide of the other hole. You'd get the same exact size group for both calibers unless you measured outside to outside.
 
I don't see how. The inside of the one hole would offset it by the same amount as the outide of the other hole. You'd get the same exact size group for both calibers unless you measured outside to outside.

What if your groups only make one hole?
 
With a one-hole group the group size = 0.00"

The center of each bullet hole is precisely 0.00" from the center of any other bullet hole. The caliber doesn't matter.

JT
 
With a one-hole group the group size = 0.00

How do you figure that? If you fired three .45s into a target with just the edges touching you could cover a span of nearly 1.5inches. The same thing with 22lr would be just over 1/2 inch. By your logic if i fire fifty rounds into a paper plate making a hole that is four inches accross thats 0.00" group? That just doesnt make sense.
 
Terminology differences at work here.

Even if the edges of the 3 holes are just touching there are still 3 distinct holes in the target.

Now if all 3 go through the same hole, then there is only one precisely round hole in the target and it's an honest-to-goodness one-hole group and the center-to-center measurement is 0.00".

Let's say I shot 50 .45s at 25 yards and ended up with one hole 3 inches across from outside edge to outside edge. I just can't see calling that a one-hole group, even though it probably is just one BIG old rough-around-the-edges hole. Measuring for a center-to-center number it would be 3" minus .45"(or whatever one hole really measures on that target) equals a group of 2.55". But it's still what some call a one-hole group.

I guess I've been spending too much time on benchrest. I used to love shooting at tin cans and rolling them around. I wish I could remember which bench shooter said that it's great if you like shooting at Coke cans, but we're shooting at the dot over the i in Pepsi.

John
 
In the figure below, the Center-to-Center distance, "C", may define what we are interested in.

This distance, "C", is the same as "S", as I believe that DMK suggested.

CCdist1.gif
"C" is also equal to "I" plus hole diameter, and equal to "O" minus the hole diameter.

C = (I + D) = (O - D)

Do remember, however, that the Center-to-Center distance of the furthest two holes may not necessarily describe the circle that contains all the shots, as shown below:

CCdist2.gif

What I believe needs to be stated everytime, which sometimes is not, is the number of shots that make up the group. I believe that 3 is the fewest I have ever heard, with 4, 5, 8, and 10 commonly used. Sometimes it has to do with the capacity of the weapon used. For an M1 Garand, I think it would be reaasonable to include 8-rounds as shot from one clip. Of course, we may also consider the 20-20-20-1000 challenge, in which case 20-rounds will be the group.

My 2¢

Alex
 
What I believe needs to be stated everytime, which sometimes is not, is the number of shots that make up the group. I believe that 3 is the fewest I have ever heard, with 4, 5, 8, and 10 commonly used.

I don't know about that. I typically get some wicked good one-shot groups. :D
 
Why not just measure the the outside edge to the inside edge of the two farthest holes?

How would you measure the inside edge of one of the farthest holes in this group?

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 5roundgrp.bmp
    79.3 KB · Views: 116
Thank you H&K thats exactly the point ive been trying to make. I guess i COULD have drawn a picture but, im lazy.
 
Hi, Hksw and c_yeager,

Typical good group. You measure from the OUTER edges of the farthest apart holes, then subtract the diameter of one hole. The result is the center-to-center distance for those holes, and that is the group size. If you can't get the diameter of a single hole, use the diameter of the bullet. It is not rocket science (unless you are firing a Gyro-Jet).

Jim
 
That is pretty much how I measure groups. Just pointing out a shortcoming to a method DMK posted.
 
One thing that makes the whole task easier is to push in the paper from the rear. Unless you are using sharp, full-wadcutter bullets, you will have some of the paper pushed through. There is gnerally a mark on the paper that nearly exactly matches the diameter of the bullet. For measuring one-hole groups, I suggest the 'subtract one diameter' to the edge-to-edge measurement as was suggested earlier. Happy shooting:

BTW, I believe that a 5-shot group should be standard. Also, you should take at least 10 shots and let the barrel cool to 'foul' the bore before you really test the accuracy of a match or plinking rifle. Hunting is different than punching holes. For hunting, it's the clean-bore, cold barrel shot that counts. When you sight in, you should clean and dry the bore between shots as well as let the barrel cool. No point in shooting different at the range than you do in the field. Bring a 22 along to pass the time.
 
As shown earlier, and also as Jim just reiterated, you can measure the outside of the farthest holes (Red "O", below) and subtract the hole diameter (Red "D").

However, the resulting diameter circle (Green "D1") may not be the circle than encloses all the (center of) holes (Blue "D2").
CCdist3.gif

Alex
 
That is pretty much how I measure groups. Just pointing out a shortcoming to a method DMK posted.
I already pointed out that shortcoming in my first post of this thread.

I also mentioned that I never get holes that touch. Hey, I shoot surplus ammo. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top