Don't sweat bad shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Don't sweat bad shooting
New Weatherby Vanguard Sub-MOA has big-price accuracy for less than $1,000.

By Mike Leggett

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Sunday, October 30, 2005

I know about flop sweat. I've had it at the shooting range, and I've been hit by it flying off the shooter in the next booth.

It's that time on the firing range when deer season is just around the corner and every shot from your rifle lands in a different spot, none of them close to the center bull. Maybe they should call it "flop-shot sweat."

Faster and faster, more desperate by the minute, you slam home another round. The barrel starts to heat up, almost guaranteeing that your rifle won't be at its most efficient. The powder-stained holes multiply, your shooting becomes even more erratic, and pretty soon all is lost.

I have a friend, a veteran shooter who knows his way around a rifle, who seldom shoots more than a pair of three-shot groups from any single gun during a visit to the range. He records each hit, the bullet that made it and cleans and returns the gun to its case. Then he'll take up another gun and not go back to the first rifle for another week.

He would never take a rifle into the field -- whether he's antelope hunting in West Texas or squirrel hunting in East Texas -- unless it were as finely tuned as possible.

But that's a perfect-world scenario for a man who owns a number of fine rifles, each designated for a particular use. Most of us have to make do with one or two, and that's why we have to start the day with confidence that our gun is going to shoot the way it should and at least in the general direction we aim it.

That's where the new Weatherby Vanguard Sub-MOA rifles come in. They are guaranteed to shoot, with factory ammunition, a three-shot group of .75-inch or less at 100 yards. Test shooter T. Yamaoka did that with mine and, bad eyes and all, I was able to duplicate it twice with different ammunition and a different scope.

Weatherby always has included a factory-shot target with every rifle sold as an assurance to each buyer that the rifle they are using is accurate to at least a 1-inch group at 100 yards. The new Sub-MOA rifles take that a step further.

MOA stands for "minute of angle." One minute of angle is considered to be about one inch at 100 yards. Most rifle scopes adjust at one click per 1/4-inch, or four clicks per inch at 100 yards.

When the grouping is even tighter, less than .75-inch, the gun is pulled from the line, fitted with Weatherby's Fiberguard, bedded stock and a recoil pad and sent back out as the Sub-MOA. The trigger is better than anything I've ever pulled right out of the box, about three pounds, crisp with no crawl. The Sub-MOA's cost a little more, but still should be available for around $750. The basic Vanguard rifle sells for just under $500 with a composite stock, but won't have the extra bells, whistles and accuracy guarantee the Sub-MOA carries.

Available in all the standard Vanguard calibers, from .22-.250 up through the .338 Winchester Magnum, the Sub-MOA offers a very nice off-the-rack alternative to $2,000 specialty rifles or accurized models with the same basic guarantees on accuracy.

I chose .308 Winchester, mainly because I think it's an overlooked caliber capable of doing duty in multiple situations. You can load up to 180-grain size and hunt elk, or down below 150 grains and give coyotes and hogs a headache.

Shooting Federal Premium 150-grain Nosler Partition bullets, I quickly had the rifle to a 100-yard zero and then was able to produce two separate half-inch groups. That's better than I can shoot. Hand-loads, or even a Ballistic Tip bullet, would no doubt produce better accuracy.

For a scope I chose a Nikon 5.5-16.5x44, matte-finish model. I like adjustable scopes and this one performed well. All the Nikon models I've been looking at are clear, have easily adjustable focusing and parallax adjustments and are priced attractively.

The 5.5-16.5 model has target adjustments of 1/4-inch MOA, which makes it easy to use if you want to make long-range adjustments for varmints or elk in the mountains.

http://www.statesman.com/sports/content/auto/epaper/editions/sunday/sports_3446d7ed33a160ba0033.html
 
An expensive rifle in the hands of somebody who can't shoot, is just that.....an expensive rifle in the hands of somebody who can't shoot.

Shooting skill cannot be aquired through the purchase of rifles, quality scopes and assorted other gee-gaws.

But then, don't tell that to folks who write columns like this one.

Afterall, they're just doing their best to help sell the rifles and the scopes and the gee-gaws.


And oh yeah, Mike Legget is spot on when he writes that the .308, perhaps the most widely spread and available centerfire rifle caliber on the face of planet earth, is an "overlooked" caliber.........

:rolleyes:


But the Sub-Moa rifle does sound like a pretty good buy for the price. But then, you can also get a Remington 700 VSS or PSS for about the same money, or a Savage for quite a bit less.

hillbilly
 
hillbilly said:
An expensive rifle in the hands of somebody who can't shoot, is just that.....an expensive rifle in the hands of somebody who can't shoot.

Can I agree and disagree at the same time?
A poor shot with a fine rifle is going to do better than a poor shot with a poor rifle.
A good shot with a fine rifle is what everyone would like to be. A good shot with a poor rifle is just going to be frustrated. If the rifle is incapable of holding a tight group, I don't care how good a shot one is, the group will be controlled by the rifle.

Dean
 
Hillbilly, in addition, I'm a little confused as to how the ballistic tips are going to give him better accuracy than any other factory round. But the Howa/Vanguard is a good value; that one with that price tag, also good value, but not quite as much.
 
SOME rifles just will not behave. I had a .243 M70 Winchester Featherweight that I bought right when they came out. NOTHING would make that gun shoot. I even resorted to taking a full DAY to try to zero it. Fired a round, waited for complete cooldown and then fired another. No matter what I did, I could not count on that rifle being in zero the NEXT time I took it out.
The stock would continually warp and touch the barrel. I finally took a rasp and hogged the channel out so you could almost run a BELT up the channel without touching the barrel.
It would still not comply.
I bedded it. Shimmed it. Adjusted the trigger as far as I could.
NOTHING would help it.
Finally sold it at a gun show.
I even tried cleaning and oiling between shots. The first shot would be somewhere and the following would be 3-4" away but not in what you could call a group. And....worst of all....the first shot would not be anywhere near the aimpoint.
Only gun I ever had that did that. But frustrating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top