No, it is not drop safe with the hammer down. It's drop safe only if "cocked and locked". Theoretically. But, frankly, the safeties on those pistols leave something to be desired, IMO, and I'm not sure I'd want to trust it 100% in actual practice. Draw your own conclusion about my opinion of carrying the Star BM as a self-defense sidearm. Which goes way beyond the question in the OP, but is probably behind the reason for it being asked. And mine doesn't function reliably with hollow-points so it's a no-go for that reason regardless.
Star BM, like most Star pistols, do not usually have a grip safety like your average 1911 pistol. Most have magazine disconnects and frame mounted safeties.I am not familiar with the Star BM. Does the safety on it work differently from the safety on a mil-spec 1911A1, for example? Or is the difference in manufacture rather than design?
Star BM, like most Star pistols, do not usually have a grip safety like your average 1911 pistol. Most have magazine disconnects and frame mounted safeties.
There is a reason the series 70 became the series 80. Even 1911 have had issues with not being drop safe. Any older gun should be very cautiously handled. This along with cost is part of why my LWC doesn’t see much carry.So it is the grip safety the makes the GI type 1911 drop safe? That surprises me, because so many pistols have abandoned grips safeties; they began to fade out of pistol design after World War I. I can see how it would make a pistol safer if it was dropped when the manual safety was off; after all, that is what it is supposed to do. But I thought Nature Boy was talking about the manual safety; maybe I misunderstood him.
No, it doesn't. In the series 80 1911 there's a plunger in the slide that blocks the firing pin until the trigger is pulled. The usual method of making a hammer-fired pistol drop safe today, but not present in the Star BM, and many other pistols of that era. Also the Star's hammer is in direct contact with the firing pin when it's down.So it is the grip safety the makes the GI type 1911 drop safe? ....
In a GI 1911, one without a firing pin safety, the grip safety prevents inertial movement of the trigger, if the gun is dropped and it lands muzzle up, which acts as a drop safety.No, it doesn't.
I'm sorry to disagree, but in my mind, any qualifier, such as "if it lands muzzle up", disqualifies it from 100% reliably acting as a drop safety. The firing pin block is 100%.In a GI 1911, one without a firing pin safety, the grip safety prevents inertial movement of the trigger, if the gun is dropped and it lands muzzle up, which acts as a drop safety.
No, it doesn't. In the series 80 1911 there's a plunger in the slide that blocks the firing pin until the trigger is pulled. The usual method of making a hammer-fired pistol drop safe today, but not present in the Star BM, and many other pistols of that era. Also the Star's hammer is in direct contact with the firing pin when it's down.
Star BM slide:
View attachment 1080453
Pin on the left is the extractor retention pin; pin on the right is the firing pin retention spring. No firing pin block plunger. As a side note, the firing pin retention pin can be removed only after first removing the rear sight. A really, really disgusting feature of this particular pistol.
And I was bad-mouthing the safety because on my gun it doesn't engage very firmly, and also if you happen to thumb it too far in the wrong direction it will plain and simply just fall out of the frame.
I think my gun just needs a whole new set of springs.
Yes. Sorry to confuse. That's the nature of the medium. I rely on the forum moderators to keep it from getting too far off course. (aka shooting my mouth off about irrelevancies).... It is both the basic 1911 (pre-firing pin lock) design and some things about the Star involved here.
Drake Oldham 1911 drop tests. Much depends on the weight/mass of the firing pin, and the strength of the firing pin spring.I remain skeptical of how far you'd have to drop a 1911 on its muzzle to make the firing pin detonate a round thru' inertia.
Moon
Huh!?!? I don't recall the movie reference right off the top, but I just did it a half dozen times in a row with my Springfield, just to test your thesis. No skin lost and very little pain. It's not hard at all....Lowering a 1911 hammer on a loaded chamber is a lot harder than Steve McQueen made it look in the movies...
Any pistol that has a DA/SA action I think it's a good idea to practice shooting both trigger pulls. If the gun doesn't have a decocker then the only practical way to practice the DA trigger pull multiple consecutive shots is to decock the hammer. So, yes, that's a reason to do it, but it's only done for training and practice, and only done in an environment and situation where you're on a shooting range, with the muzzle pointed downrange, and an accidental discharge if your thumb slips is not a big deal....I can't think of any reason you'd want to....