Sam1911
Moderator Emeritus
Hi Guys!
I've been thinking of branching out a bit in my (IDPA) shooting habits and trying a little Stock (and maybe Enhanced) Service Pistol. Basically moving into the 9mm camp, if only just for yuks -- not "serious" work.
I've become sort of "arms-length" fascinated with the CZ-75 family of guns, and have been reading a bit about them, but I'd like some info from guys with experience.
First off, I'd been all set to try to find an SP-01. Wow, what a cool (looking) gun, and accurate as all get-out. Looks like an obvious choice. Except that I've stumbled on a bunch more questions.
The new /American Rifleman/ has a very encouraging article about the EAA Witness version of the CZ that makes it sound like the Witness line is better in ergonomics, reliability, price, etc. than the original CZ-75s. Well, that sounds nice. Maybe I need an EAA Witness Match (or "Stock"?) instead of the CZ SP-01. How do they compare? And what is the difference between the "Match" and the "Stock"? (A confusing distinction in that /AR/ indicated that the "Stock" was a more refined competition gun than the "Match.")
Between whichever of the two Witness models is the "good" one, and the SP-01, which has a lower bore axis? Which is more "ergonomic" and "shootable?" Which one is stronger? Which would you buy?
Next, the /AR/ article said that the polymer framed Witness guns were ever MORE ergonomically pleasing, especially with a thinner grip. SO, again, what's the deal? Which would you want to shoot (a lot)? Is it possible to get a polymer version that is tuned to the same level as the metal guns? Can the triggers in the polymer gun feel as good (when tuned) as the metal ones? One of the reasons I have avoided polymer guns is that I very much dislike the distinctive "SPROINK" feel of every Glock, M&P, and xD I've shot. "Breaking glass?" No, more like a ball-point pen pushed beyond its limits. (And, no, the trigger-jobbed ones may be lighter and smoother, but they don't feel "good.")
And, to take the question in a different direction, how does the final bore axis height on these guns compare to that of the new M&Ps? I've watched a great many fabulous shooters in my area switch to the M&P in the last year or so, all claiming them to have better feel and pointability, and a higher recovery time (extremely low bore axis) than their other pistols. I might just have to get over my anti-plastic hump and buy one. But, I'd like to give the CZ a chance first.
Help me out!
Thanks!
-Sam
I've been thinking of branching out a bit in my (IDPA) shooting habits and trying a little Stock (and maybe Enhanced) Service Pistol. Basically moving into the 9mm camp, if only just for yuks -- not "serious" work.
I've become sort of "arms-length" fascinated with the CZ-75 family of guns, and have been reading a bit about them, but I'd like some info from guys with experience.
First off, I'd been all set to try to find an SP-01. Wow, what a cool (looking) gun, and accurate as all get-out. Looks like an obvious choice. Except that I've stumbled on a bunch more questions.
The new /American Rifleman/ has a very encouraging article about the EAA Witness version of the CZ that makes it sound like the Witness line is better in ergonomics, reliability, price, etc. than the original CZ-75s. Well, that sounds nice. Maybe I need an EAA Witness Match (or "Stock"?) instead of the CZ SP-01. How do they compare? And what is the difference between the "Match" and the "Stock"? (A confusing distinction in that /AR/ indicated that the "Stock" was a more refined competition gun than the "Match.")
Between whichever of the two Witness models is the "good" one, and the SP-01, which has a lower bore axis? Which is more "ergonomic" and "shootable?" Which one is stronger? Which would you buy?
Next, the /AR/ article said that the polymer framed Witness guns were ever MORE ergonomically pleasing, especially with a thinner grip. SO, again, what's the deal? Which would you want to shoot (a lot)? Is it possible to get a polymer version that is tuned to the same level as the metal guns? Can the triggers in the polymer gun feel as good (when tuned) as the metal ones? One of the reasons I have avoided polymer guns is that I very much dislike the distinctive "SPROINK" feel of every Glock, M&P, and xD I've shot. "Breaking glass?" No, more like a ball-point pen pushed beyond its limits. (And, no, the trigger-jobbed ones may be lighter and smoother, but they don't feel "good.")
And, to take the question in a different direction, how does the final bore axis height on these guns compare to that of the new M&Ps? I've watched a great many fabulous shooters in my area switch to the M&P in the last year or so, all claiming them to have better feel and pointability, and a higher recovery time (extremely low bore axis) than their other pistols. I might just have to get over my anti-plastic hump and buy one. But, I'd like to give the CZ a chance first.
Help me out!
Thanks!
-Sam