England and Australia, This is what a disarmed country looks like.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I could only get as far as the Colt collection. It's hard to describe the sense of loss I felt for those honorable, law-abiding citizens who willingly gave up their arms.

PS: I wonder if the criminals also gave up their guns.
 
Why did those honorable, law-abiding people give up their guns? No way I will. Dig a big hole in the woods somewhere? Yes. Give them away to the feds? He!! no! The day a total ban of any type of firearm hits the books is the day I become a criminal.
Someone in the video mentioned that the next step is total dictatorship. I won't be unarmed when that happens here.
 
Why did those honorable, law-abiding people give up their guns? No way I will. Dig a big hole in the woods somewhere? Yes.

In 1 Word.

Registration.

All of those were Registered, if they tried that, they would be serving a prison sentence more harsh than what murderers get before they could have blinked.
 
Word on the street is that some people did bury their guns, and the government brought in dogs to sniff the glue used to seal the storage capsules. No win.
 
From the comments on the Beeb article cited above by Service Soon:

I'd rather, if my granny were to be mugged, that she had the choice to pull out her purse, or her .45 Magnum.
Sid, UK

And where would Granny be packing that there .45 Magnum?

"Use enough gun."

In my old age and dotage, I'm looking forward to mounting a scabbard on my walker or wheelchair.

Or maybe on my cane. Would that be classed as "All Other Weapons?"

(Photo captured from gunblast.com for educational purposes.)
 

Attachments

  • 45 winchester magnum.jpg
    45 winchester magnum.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 81
Wow...just wow...I am speechless. If that doesn't make you want to get off your a$$ and get active, nothing will.
 
Thank you for sharing this powerful video. I believe everyone needs to see this. I will post it on my signature.

Thanks.

:)
 
That's going to happen to us too because we lack the unity that is needed.

I really hope it doesn't. What ALL gun owners in America need to realize is that in these countries, they were only going after a few different types of firearms at first, once they banned those, they went on to the next type, and the next.

If they can't accomplish a ban on firearms, they probably will try a ban/massive tax on ammunition. Stock up on components!

The bottom line is, we cannot allow this to happen in America. Period.
 
the UK was disarmed in 1945:mad:
yes you could weapons but not for self defence.
you have the right to self defense just don't try carrying anything.
my house weapon of self defence is a 5 foot stick I found in the local wood out reaches a baseball bat and was free.
pretty ****e against a tryranny though :(
 
Interesting video - I found myself purchasing my first one year NRA membership online immediately after. (not they are the most staunch defenders of 2A, but its the biggest organization we have)
 
For those of us who are youtube-impaired, would someone provide a brief thumbnail sketch of what the first link in this thread is about? Thank you.
 
and the strangest part is in what was europe, one can own any rifle...so long as the reciver is demilled ie:all welded up,

makes one think, how many spare "parts" are laying around.:neener:
 
For those of us who are youtube-impaired, would someone provide a brief thumbnail sketch of what the first link in this thread is about? Thank you.
About This Video:

England's increasingly repressive firearms laws often are praised by those who would restrict the American right to arms, so it is important to realize that those firearms laws, which now prohibit the private possession of handguns, rest heavily on one foundation--the British gun owner licensing system. The right to keep and bear arms had been alive in England for eight centuries when Parliament enacted the Pistols Act of 1903. The Act, which prohibited the sale of pistols to minors and felons, also dictated that pistols could be sold only to those who possessed a gun license. Since the license could be obtained at a post office with only the payment of a fee, and since no license was required to keep a pistol solely in the home, there was no opposition. But within a few short years, the licensing system had moved from the post office to the police station. Suddenly, Britons who wanted to own handguns--or rifles--had to prove they had "good reason" for receiving a police permit. Shotguns were considered "sporting" and were exempted from licensing requirements until 1967.

Anti-gun lobbyists in the United States have called for a "needs-based licensing" system and some politicians have lined up to do their bidding.

Is licensing gun owners a good idea? After all, "we license people to drive cars don't we?" If requiring gun owners to obtain a government license seems like a harmless idea to you, you may want to know about "Firearms Form 101." That's the "Application For A Firearms Certificate" that must be filled out by Britons in order to purchase a rifle or muzzleloading handgun. A separate form is required for a "shotgun certificate."

Section 27 of the Firearms Act of 1968 (as amended by the 1997 Act) requires a chief officer of the Police Firearms Licensing Department to be satisfied that the applicant is "fit to be entrusted with a firearm." (Emphasis added) As the applicant, you must provide: * Your home address for the last three years. * Your occupation and business address. * Information about previous convictions, including traffic violations. * Information about any history of Epilepsy. * Information about past treatment for drug use, depression or nervous disorders. * The name of your doctor, and permission for the police to search your medical records to obtain "factual details" about your medical history. * A list of the firearms you already own, including caliber, type, maker's name and serial number. * A list of the ammunition you already own, including caliber and quantity. * A list of the firearms you wish to purchase, stating the reason for wanting to purchase them and where you plan on shooting or hunting with them. * A list of the maximum amount of ammunition you wish to possess at any one time, by caliber. * A list of the maximum amount of ammunition you plan to purchase at any one time, by caliber. * An address where the guns will be stored, for possible future inspection. * Information about whether you have previously held a firearms certificate, or a shotgun certificate. * A letter signed by the secretary of your shooting club or each landowner where you plan to hunt attesting to the fact that you have permission to shoot at those locations. * Four passport size photos of yourself. * A fee of L56 (approximately $90).

As an applicant, you must also designate two "referees" who will fill out a reference form regarding your character. This form will never be shown to you even though it weighs heavily in the final decision to approve or deny the application. The "referees" must: * Have known you for at least the last two years. * Not be a member of your family, a firearms dealer, a police officer or a police employee. * Be of "good character." * Sign the application form declaring that it has been answered truthfully. * Sign and date the back of one of your passport photos attesting that it is an accurate representation of you at that time. * Explain in what capacity they have known you. * Indicate if they are members of a shooting club, and if so their license number and role in the club. * Provide their "opinion as to the applicant's suitability to possess firearms." * Provide information on your personal history, including any history of emotional problems, mental or physical disabilities and explain how knowledge of the information was gained. * Explain any difficulties you have with members of your family which "may give cause for concern given that a firearm or ammunition may be available in the household." * Explain their knowledge of your experience with firearms. * Explain their knowledge of your attitude toward firearms. * Be subjected to a background check and allow personal information to be held on a police computer.

These measures have put Draconian regulations on the law-abiding gun owners of Great Britain and done little to reduce crime. On Jan. 16, 2000, the London Times published an article about the increase in gun crimes, and bemoaning the fact that there are an estimated three million unregistered guns in the nation. Besides confirming the inescapable fact that criminals don't bother to license their guns, the article stated that fatal shootings in London more than doubled between 1998 and 1999, and overall armed crime rose 10%.

So, if licensing honest gun owners doesn't reduce crime--and how could it?--what is the real purpose? For British gun owners, the answer came too late, when the government that licensed them finally decreed that they were not "fit to be entrusted" to own handguns for any reason. Gun owners in the U.S. cannot plead ignorance--here the true purpose of licensing gun owners was defined nearly a quarter-century ago by the first Chair of Handgun Control, Inc. "Our ultimate goal," Pete Shields said, is "to make the the possession of all handguns and handgun ammunition . . . totally illegal ("The New Yorker , July 26, 1976)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top