Extremely Close Quarters Shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Paul Gomez

Yes, I can envision one.

When my back is against a wall, and I have nowhere to go.

As I said, I would rather do a "take away"(Krav) than use the Speed Rock at "bad breath" distances. The Speed Rock is just another tool in my bag of tricks.
 
If your back is, literally, against a wall, how can you do a speedrock?:)

I'd rather drive forward into Mr. Bad Guy than stand there and attempt to "wave away" from the attack. The thing is, you are "horribly comprimised as an athlete" when performing a speedrock. You are hoping that by somehow shooting this guy he will simply cease to be there and that's not going to happen. Even if you hammer the bad guy with Thor's Hammer and he ceases to function, his body still has momentum. He is still quite likely to plow into you, whether he inflicts damage with a weapon or not. When 180 pounds of soggy meat hits you and you are already folded backwards with no way to regain your balance, odds are that you're going to fall down and the soggy meat will fall on top of you. Does this sound like someplace you want to be? I find a whole lot more value in getting aggressive from the get go and moving forward, preferably with some sort of elbow shield or elbow spike.
 
A guy shot at me one time with a 12 gauge shotgun from about three paces. He yelled, "Hey you SOB !" I turned in time to see him coming up with the gun. Fire came out the barrel, straight toward me ! Something brushed past my ear and jerked my hair.

I was totally untrained in anyway, but I was within ONE STEP of hard cover.
I drew up on one leg and covered my face, just as the shot broke. That was my defensive manuever.

Turns out it was a , not so funny, joke. Some dumb----- where I worked at the time had picked all the shot out of a shell to play a joke on me. They didn't know the wadding could have seriously injured me. Duh !

I should have beat the **** out of somebody, but I felt too weak afterwards to even stand up.

Another time, I was highly trained, and two guys jumped me with ski masks and a chain saw. (Yes, it was another joke. I've worked with some great guys !) It was after dark, and I hear this "We're gonna kill you motherf***** !" I turn to see two guys in ski masks starting a chain saw (The saw had the chain off, but man the sparks flew for some reason in the dark !!! ) I stood there for about .5 seconds as things kind of moved in slow motion. Then I was gone ! A race horse couldn't have caught me.

Didn't beat anybody up the first time cause I wasn't trained. Didn't beat anybody up the second time cause I was ! I just can't win :)

My experience has been that basic physical fitness is very important. Particularly important is balance and foot speed. By foot speed I mean the ability to move your feet around quickly, like a boxer. Then there is training for various specific skills.

Hope you guys enjoyed the practical jokes at my expense.
Zippy
 
As an aside, I'm surprised no one has brought up the roll of situational awarness in this. And, how that effects not only your ability to be ambushed (reduces, doesn't eliminate - before someone starts on that saw) but your reaction time as well.

Anyone else remember about Living in Yellow?
 
Press Check,

Hmmm. CT has a computer, AND a website, yet You must do his posting for him. Hmmmmmm. I looked at your posting history and see you are associated with HALO who hosts Taylor in North Cal. Double HHmmmmmm.

You wrote (as CT):

"2. At no time have I ever told students to use it in preference to physical techniques. What I always tell them is that they need a firearm-oriented response to a nightmare situation and since it was a shooting class, we would use the firearm-oriented response".:scrutiny:

I recall specifically CT disagreeing with MF and I about this. His reply was always - Either You Shoot Or You Fight.

"3. I spent considerable time discussing the situation in which a speedrock might be used. Obviously, both Suarez and some of the other posters have conveniently forgotten the fact in order to criticize.":eek:

Nope, we haven't forgotten it, we've simply discarded it as an obsolete archaic technique in favor of more workable techniques. And yes, I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is - with simmunitions or airsoft or whatever...anytime anyplace.:evil:

"4. I also said from the outset that one must decide whether or not to use physical techniques or the weapon and that it many instances it was a better idea, particularly if you were skilled in hand to hand combat. At no time did I state that one should automatically use it in preference to physical methods. It is an extreme emergency technique used only if a deadly weapon had to be used and there was no room to gain standoff distance."

Sorry, but I specifically remember several times at F$ where an issue was made of this. "You either shoot or you fight", was what I and others remember.

Additionally, even in a shooting class, some questions DO NOT HAVE SHOOTING ANSWERS. If a man is standing 3 feet away with a gun in hand are you going to teach a disarm, or a speed rock? The only reason to NOT teach the disarm is that one does not know any, as THAT and not the speed rock is the most viable answer.:mad:

Moreover, we are not forced to choose between physical techniques (hand to hand non-shooting methods) and the old speed rock. Rather, to the contary, we can choose between the old speed rock, and more reality-based methods.

"5. The location of the weapon back and above the holster is the most difficult place for the attacker to reach. That Suarez and other posters think they can get to it as easily as they do indicates that they don't understand the correct purpose or methodology of the maneuver."

:rolleyes: Be Fight Focused - Not Gun Focused. I'm not trying to get to the silly weapon, I'm simply trying to stick my Cold Steel tanto through your chest to tickle your spine. Or simply smash into you and shoot you in the guts with my own gun, or foul your draw with a "physical movement". Its not that hard. Whether you get a couple of shots off in less than 1.0 seconds or not is irrelevant if you have a 7" blade sticking out of your chest.

Once upon a time, one handed shooting with a wheel gun with the other hand stuck in the pocket was considered state of the art. We know better now. Similarly, the speed rock and the sister technique, the step back were once cutting edge. We also know better now.

Those who disagree, try it force on force with a determined training partner with airsoft or simmunitions. I won't need to explain anymore after that.

In my younger years I once raced motorcycles. there was a saying "When The Green Flag Drops - The Bullsh*t Stops". Fits in gunfighting as well.

Thanks Press - say hello to the lads in Concord :D ;)
 
Mr. Suarez weren't you also associated with Halo Group at one time?

_____

Paul,

As a student of Blauer's, I'm surprised that you're so concerned with "being on-balance" in what appears to be the text-book way of thinking. What about the Range Rover drill? There is always an option, regardless of body position, balance, etc... is there not?
When we shoot paper or mannequins, they are generally not going to come at us when the drill is initiated... certianly not with the force of a 180lb+ attacker at 6 inches. To me, practicing the speed-rock technique puts us in a realistic position for a typical haymaker or headlock/tackle type attack from a determined opponent.

As for speed-rocking against the wall... this is where semantics and dogma get in the way of common sense. If you can't envision throwing your hips up and out, arching on your shoulder blades and canting to one side as an effective version of the technique, you are thinking way too linearly.
________

For everyone's consideration: I remember using and teaching a "shove & shoot" type techniqe for a long time, I still think it has its place, particularly when the shove is to clear a weapon or change an angle... not necessarily to delibitate the attacker. Recently, I attended a seminar where an aggressive throat/face shove was advised to clear a CQ attacker from you before you draw and shoot. The problen I had with this was that if the advocated technique worked properly, it virtually eliminated the need (justification...) to shoot. When teaching non-lethal responses to situations which justify lethal force, but make going to gun impractical, I think it is imperitive to remind students that the situation must be constantly re-eveluated to determine if lethal force is still necessary/justified.
 
Rob,

It sounds like you have taken a techique (the speed rock) and transformed it into something more useful than the origional by finding value in it as a body position to work from.

The origional speed rock involved folding yourself far enough rearward that you would bring the muzzle of your pistol to an appropriate angle to get center mass shots. Remember on the drawstroke utilized by Taylor (and Cooper) the gun began arcing forward as soon as the muzzle cleared the top of the holster, so a significant rearward bend is required to get the muzzle on-line with the torso of the threat. It requires me to bend away to a much greater degree than I tend to flinch backwards do to an incoming blow.

As Blauer says, there is no right or wrong, only more desirable and less desirable. I find the speed rock to be a less desirable technique to accomplish the goal of dealing with a close range assailant. I believe that a physical response, followed by accessing a weapon is a much more desirable response and one that I am more likely to pull off successfully under real world stress.

For those who are interested, I've attached a classic pic of Chuck Taylor executing a Speed Rock.
 

Attachments

  • speed rock.jpg
    speed rock.jpg
    10.1 KB · Views: 115
Paul,

I guess that you are 100% correct. While CT may disagree, I am working with the "concept" of the Speed-Rock, not a dogmatic kata-ish technique.

Thanks for helping express that! ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top