Eye relief on 1x optics?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LooseGrouper

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
225
Could someone please explain to me why true 1x optics still have a limited eye relief?

I am looking for a battery free option with similar capabilities to Eotechs and Aimpoints. I'm not a fan of the way reflexive sights perform in some light conditions. I found the Leupold Prismatic sight and thought that was the ticket until I noticed it required 3-5" eye relief.

So, are there any 1x optics with just plain old regular crosshairs/reticles that don't require a certain eye relief and are relatively parallax-free?

If not, why? I'm sure there is some scientific explaination dealing with focal planes, etc, and I'd like to know what it is.

Thanks

LG
 
Not really an answer....but EO's & C-more's don't have an exit pupil like a conventional scope, so they can be used at any distance from the eye.

If you run a kill-flash any glare on the objective will be eliminated, you may want to try one out...The newer Aimpoints are pretty bright.

As far as the the whole eye relief issue w/ a conventional tube type scope, the exit pupil is what chokes out the image. If you look through a 1/4" hole 2 inches from your eye, you see quite a bit. If you hold it at arms length, you can't see much. I think there's a secondary problem that has to do with the focal point and the ability to see the crosshairs at a distance.

"If your scope is four power (4X), and your objective lens is thirty-six millimeters in diameter (36mm), divide 4 into 36 and it equals 9. Nine would be the exit pupil size in diameter in millimeters."

That's my guess!
 
Last edited:
I'm not a fan of the way reflexive sights perform in some light conditions.
There is a solution here with the Aimpoints. You simply close the front cover, set the dot at a comfortable level, and use it like the old OEG type sights. You can move from light to dim/dark and back again and the dot stays at a constant brightness thats easy to see. No bloom or wash out.

This also eliminates the need for a killflash, which I always found to be very annoying.
 
Thanks for the input, guys, but I'm really not looking for anything that requires batteries (or fiber optics/tritium). I probably wasn't too clear, but when I said "reflexive" I was talking about sights like the Trijicon that use fiber/tritium.

My question is: "Why does something like a Leupold Prismatic have a limited eye relief when an Aimpoint/Eotech/reflexive sight does not."

beatcop, I appreciate the effort but I still don't understand. Why a 1x sight with a physical reticle requires a certain range of eye relief when red dot or holographic sight can "project" a reticle with little or no ill effects from various eye relief or allignments.

Sorry if I'm asking dumb questions. I'll try doing some more research.
 
Hmmm, I believe the the size of a projected dot is constant, since it's projected onto one surface, although it can seem to "grow" by turning up the brightness, but the size of a conventional (tube scope) reticle is small and extremely thin. At arms length it would be invisible if there wasn't some kind of magnification/interaction with the lenses...the focal point is set for 3" (for example) away from the eye and therefore everything is in perspective.

I suspect that the Leupold has some kind of multiple lens arrangement that is more closely related to a "normal" scope and a bit different from the heads-up display versions. Well, that's my best bs answer.

Get a Trijicon Reflex. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top