Family members of Federal Judge murdered.

Status
Not open for further replies.

LawDog

Moderator Emeritus cum Laude
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
2,101
The husband and mother of US Judge Joan Lefkow were slain in an execution style murder today.

This, in and of itself, is a bad thing, but I am interested in a sub-part of the investigation.

Judge Lefkow was the presiding judge in a trademark-infringment lawsuit involving the World Church of the Creator and it's founder, Matt Hale. For those of you not familiar with Matt Hale, he's a big proponent of what he calls "racial holy war".

During the whole thing, Matt Hale wound up in being found guilty of soliciting the murder of the judge.

Now here's the kicker, and where my interest piques: apparently at least one Internet Forum frequented by white supremacists wound up with a thread wanting pictures of the judge, her husband and their children. Such photos were posted, and further along in the course of the thread personal information of the judge and her family were discovered and posted to the thread.

Might be some interesting - scary - ramifications for Internet forum Administration and Staff coming out of this one. Probably one to keep an eye on.

LawDog
 
I was hoping it was some sort serial killer that goes after liberal federal judges.

If it is some lame white supremacist thing, I will be disappointed.

Lefkow seems to have decided a billion cases, who knows which one of them might have wanted to kill her.
 
Re: Implications for racist internet forums.

Likely some fed legislator will propose more privacy-robbing bills to address this threat. In reality, not really needed; most of the members of such anti-gov sites are already confidential informants, deep-cover agent provacateurs, ADL, SPLC, etc.

I never heard of this Hale guy before...seems he graduated law school, passed the bar exam, but was denied his law license for his openly racist views. His conviction on threatening the judge was engineered by a CI.
 
Other interesting facets of this case:

1. Matt Hale is also the guy who was accused of inciting Benjamin Smith to go on his multi-state shooting spree (he drove through Illinois and Indiana shooting anyone who "looked Jewish" or black. One of his victims was Ricky Birdsong, who was apparently a famous basketball coach.)

2. I'm not sure why Hale hated Lefkow so much, because she actually ruled in his favor when she heard the case (implausibly, I thought.)
It was the appeals court above her that reversed her decision and ruled against Hale. She was just the one who had to deal with enforcing their decision against Hale, who never had any intentions of "working within the law" no matter how many disclaimers he puts out.

3. Hale thought Lefkow was Jewish. When he found out she was an Episcopalian, he told people she'd married a jew and that was just as bad. Her husband's not Jewish either.
I don't know where the wacko got that one, except that Lefkow sounds Eastern-European so it MUST be a Jewish name.

4. As John Kass points out in the Chicago Tribune today, federal judges have no shortage of vicious enemies. Lefkow, for instance, once refused to grant bond to one Mr. Schweihs, known in Chicago as "The German." The German is a professional killer among other things and known for a certain professional zeal.

Still, the smart money is betting some lunatic who lives in his parents' basement thought his hero Matt Hale (another lunatic who lives in his parents' house) would finally respect him if he offed that Jew Judge who had the temerity force her Zionist principles on the World Church by obeying the mandate of a superior court.



We talk about Democrats and Republicans here a lot, but these are our enemies. They're the enemies of every civilized man, woman and child. People who would shoot an old man and an older woman for the crime of being the loved one of a woman who MIGHT disagree with their politics but certainly didn't agree strongly enough.
 
Might be some interesting - scary - ramifications for Internet forum Administration and Staff coming out of this one. Probably one to keep an eye on.

Maybe. People in the public eye are always gonna face more risks from psychos, whether they are Federal Judges or Jon Bene Ramsey....or a CCW permit holder in Ohio exposed by the local newspaper.

There does seem to be a rush to blame this Hale guy and/or his followers (if he has any). I would guess there's no shortage of people in Chicago who would do something like this. IIRC from my yout in Illinois....a .22 to the back of the head was used quite often by South Side gangs to send a message....including associates of the illustrious Louis Farrakhan.
 
According to news reports, Hale is in prison after being convicted of soliciting to have Judge Lefkow murdered.

(Thread drift ON) Seems kinda strange that yesterday I heard Geraldine Ferraro poo-poo'ing the advance of democracy in Iraq/Middle East, using the same-day asassination of an Iraqi Federal Judge as an example. (Thread drift OFF)
 
According to news reports, Hale is in prison after being convicted of soliciting to have Judge Lefkow murdered.

Yes, his sentencing is coming up. Seems like a strange time for an associate of his to murder the judge's family. Seems like a good fall guy for someone else to use though. Maybe she's an honest judge. That in itself could be a death warrant in Chicago.
 
I highly doubt it is white supremacists. Hale has been in solitary for a while now and only seen prison guards and his parents, neither of whom are likely to be murder conspirators. If it is whtie supremacists, I bet you it was a sponatenous act by a lone individual and not a contract killing.

It also seems way too easy to pin the blame on a a bunch of unpopular crazies just so they can say they caught someone.
 
That is the sort of thing I would expect to see happening in Colombia.

I thought the large groups had been broken in the 90's, but perhaps I am mistaken...
 
Please say a prayer for my dear friends Joan and Michael Lefkow; two of the finest people I have ever known.

I think Eric got it exactly right today:

chicagotribune.com

Eric Zorn
Political killings carry a threat for all society


Published March 2, 2005


Of all the forms of murder that rip the fabric of society, an organized assassination is by far the worst.

Obviously, this thought is prompted by Monday's slaying of U.S. District Judge Joan H. Lefkow's husband and mother in her family's North Side Chicago home. Yet just as obviously it's important to add that police haven't linked those slayings to followers of imprisoned white supremacist leader Matthew Hale, who was convicted last year of soliciting the judge's murder.

We don't yet know why attorney Michael F. Lefkow, 64, and Donna Grace Humphrey, 89, were shot in the family's basement. Among other possibilities, they may have been victims of a wandering sociopath, a startled or murderous home invader, or a killer with a grudge against the family unrelated to the judge's position.

What we do know is that the ability of judges and other public officials to make decisions without fearing for their lives or, worse, the lives of their loved ones is key to our way of life.

We know that fear is corrupting, corrosive, malignant, metastatic. It's toxic to freedom, the enemy of justice.

We see more than our share of mayhem in this country--random, predatory; purposeful, senseless. But what we don't see, or haven't seen in a long time, are orchestrated hits on key government, law enforcement and business officials of the sort we associate with third-world thugocracies and nations nearly paralyzed by terrorism.

American assassins and would-be assassins of the last several decades have tended to be lone nuts--your loopy John Hinckleys, pathetic Mark David Chapmans and deluded Squeaky Frommes--and not particularly threatening to others.

The few and isolated exceptions prove the rule: The November, 1973, assassination of Oakland's public schools superintendent Marcus Foster by the radical Symbionese Liberation Army and the June 1984 planned slaying of liberal talk-show host Alan Berg by three members of a white supremacist group are two that come to mind.

Even in a highly security-conscious age when gangs rule neighborhoods, graft greases the system and many people fear going out alone, we have lived under the fundamental presumption that our lawmakers, our police, our prosecutors and our judges are free from the threat of retaliatory murder.

This presumption is so strong that many of us have laughed at the inflated self-importance of mid-level politicians who travel with teams of bodyguards: Get over yourself, ya pompous bureaucrat. You're not that important, and we don't live in that kind of country.

In the United States, with very few exceptions, the mighty, the wealthy and the influential live in neighborhoods, walk down streets, dine in restaurants and shop in stores right alongside everybody else.

Even though our lives have felt constricted by metal detectors, gated communities, surveillance cameras and other forms of security, we still live in a remarkably open society.

Why here? It's just not how we've done things. I'll leave further explanations and analysis to the political scientists, sociologists and psychologists.

But the status quo is fragile. Here's why news of this crime feels so sickeningly ominous: Any organized, politically motivated attack on a judge or a judge's family is an attack on a core presumption that shapes our daily lives--that major decision-makers operate free from the fear of organized intimidation, extortion and bloody revenge.

If that precious presumption shatters, we risk turning into one of those nations where the powerful and famous live in cocoons protected by thick walls, deadbolts, bulletproof glass and armed guards. They scurry from place to place, an eye always out for killers and kidnappers.

Political courage is backed by blood and underwritten by terrible risk. Moral bravery is about more than words.

It's too early to conclude that the presumption suffered a serious crack Monday in Judge Joan Lefkow's home.

But it's not too early to hope that it didn't.
 
Fedlaw, I'm fairly certain they could assassinate half the federal judiciary and I would still be in no danger, either from assasination or from side effects of not having enough judges.

Yeah yeah murder is bad, but lets not make too big a deal about it just because it was someone "important." If I was assassinated, it wouldnt even make the local news, yet is my life somehow less valuable than a federal judge's?
 
My understanding is that the husband of the judge was a practicing lawyer as well. I hope the investigators are looking into any potential enemies he had as well.

I just hope that the Chicago police don't get blinders on and do the tunnel vision thing. They need to keep an open mind to properly investigate.
 
Such photos were posted, and further along in the course of the thread personal information of the judge and her family were discovered and posted to the thread.
Similar to the Ohio newspaper publishing the names of CCW holders.
 
The symbology value of the judiciary is extremely high in a nation that prides itself on abiding by the rule of law. It is the judges and justices that are the visible manifestation of that rule. Those who occupy the bench are the physical representation of an abstract concept. An attack on these symbols is much more than an attack on a mortal. We may think some judges are baffoons, idiots, or fools. In some case they are. Regardless, they represent our system of law.

Illinois and / or the federales have no choice but go after the perps with hammer and tong. An unanswered attack will beg only that another attack takes place.

The fear I have is those who would control the internet will use this as an excuse to "crack down" on assault websites (you people know the lingo). In case you haven't noticed elements of the internet alternative media have conducted some very successful operations against the incumbent political structure. Sooner or later the empire will strike back with an attack on the internet. I fear this episode will be used as an excuse for some kind of restriction.
 
No one seems to be allowing for the possibility that the husband was actually the intended target, his mother just happened to be there, and the judge herself had nothing to do with it.

I don't want to post the link here, but if you find the web site for the husband's law practice, you will see that he specialized in employment law with further specializations in Postal Workers and issues surrounding mental incapacity as it relates to employment. I'm not kidding Postal employees and crazy people. That's a dangerous client mix! While his web site describes his successes for his clients, we can assume that he lost some cases as well. Maybe someone went Postal on him.

I'm thinking that the husband was the intended target and he just happened to be married to a judge who had issues with a white supremacist. But I'm only speculating.
 
At first, I considered a reply to this thread, considering the fact that my attitude toward certain issues underwent a significant change on the selfsame streets of Chicago less than two months ago. But then I thought that my reply might be considered a bit tangential, so I posted it separately as a new thread, entitled "It's a tragedy, but..."
 
Those who occupy the bench are the physical representation of an abstract concept. An attack on these symbols is much more than an attack on a mortal.
America ought not have a class of "nobles" perceived to have more highly valued lives or more right to exist than the rest of us, who are thus relegated to "peasant" status.

The lives of a government employee and his family are worth PRECISELY the same as the lives of John Q. Public and his family. Anything else is odious to the fundamental American principle that all men are created equal.
 
While I agree that no one's life is more valuable than another's, I see a qualitative difference between a murder committed for personal reasons- as the vast majority are- and assasinating someone for doing their job in the justice system. It's already been said, but if we allow that sort of thing, we're well down the road to total chaos.
 
I agree with P35 and others. A murder is a tradgedy either way, but the assasination of a political or judicial figure is also political engineering through violance. I'm suprised no one has called it terrorism yet. I guess people are getting sick of the term.
 
Well, for all we know at this point, it could turn out to have been some mental case who picked the Lefkow's house at random. If it was aimed at the judge because of her work, I don't think anyone will hesitate to call it terrorism.

FWIW, the father of actor Woody Harrelson (the dumb blonde guy from "Cheers") is serving a life term for murdering a Federal judge. IIRC it had to do with a pot smuggling ring in Texas, but I don't recall the details beyond that. I don't think a killing like that qualifies as "terrorism", because it was done for business rather than political reasons. Not to say that he wasn't lucky to get off with a life sentence for that, of course.
 
This kind of lets people know what we would be in for if all of the crazies who talk about overthrowing the government ever actually started trying to do it. You don't think it could happen here until you go to a few other countries that at one time were pretty civilized ,like Yugoslavia or Lebanon, to see how much damage just a few wingnuts can do.
 
Fedlaw, I'm fairly certain they could assassinate half the federal judiciary and I would still be in no danger, either from assasination or from side effects of not having enough judges.

Never studied the effects of targeting of the judiciary, have you? Spend some time researching Colombia and Italy and you'll see something interesting that'll show how false your statement is.

By the way, the '68 Gun Control Act was brought about in large part in response to the assassinations of JFK and MLK. What laws do you think would flow from the incredible numbers you're suggesting?

But hey, I'm biased. I know some federal judges who are actually very good folks. Something about the concept of seeing them murdered by scum (or having their families murdered) for doing their jobs bothers me.
 
One of the reports that I saw on the boob tube quoted that threats against federal judges was up 7X since the early 90's.

Then we have statements like "A murder is a tradgedy either way, but the assasination of a political or judicial figure is also political engineering through violance."

Maybe someone got tired of the "political engineering thruogh the judicery" and decided that if those with black robes can change society w/o the law, maybe they could too. Maybe someone decided that federal judges had traveled so far beyond the line that it was time to put and end to it.

Who knows, maybe this isn't about her, maybe her mom was having an affair and her husband happened to be home when the score was settled. Maybe it was due to her husbands work. Maybe it was due to a case she had or was about to sit on. Or maybe she just happened to be a target of opportunity for those that would "feed the hogs" and thin the federal government a bit. I don't know.
 
Maybe someone got tired of the "political engineering thruogh the judicery" and decided that if those with black robes can change society w/o the law, maybe they could too. Maybe someone decided that federal judges had traveled so far beyond the line that it was time to put and end to it.

This is the kind of thinking, that you can start killing and destroying instruments of government that make decisions you don't agree with, and everyone else will just start to agree with you, and do what you want, out of fear of being killed.

That is terrorism, plain and simple. And, the sad and amazing thing is, that there are a lot of fruitcakes in this country who are stupid enough to do it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top