Favorite 100 gr+ .243 Bullet For Deer?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PCCUSNRET

Member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,166
Location
Virginia
Have come to the conclusion that my Remington 700 in .243 with 9 1/4 twist barrel does not like any bullets weighing less than 100 grs. I have tried 5 different brands, Nosler, Berger, Hornady, Speer and Sierra and it won't group any less than 2" on a regular basis. I took the advice of some here and bought some commercial ammo with bullets over 100gr and managed to get one group of 5 to shoot less than 1" (a friend was shooting my rifle as I wanted a second opinion before sending the gun back to Remington to see if something was wrong with this gun). I shot the other 15 rounds in this box and I had a couple 2" groups, but nothing to write home about. I would use it in a pinch, but would prefer to come up with a more accurate round if I'm to use this gun for deer hunting. Any suggestions for heavier .243 bullets for deer hunting? Thanks!

Load recommendations would be nice too!
 
I have a 770 with 9 1/8" twist. It does great with 65gr from Hornady. IMR4064 is the tightest fallowed by BL-C(2) & I use something close in burn rate to Blue Dot that is right up there with them. Varget works somewhat but not well enough to make me happy. I'm new to the .243 but it seems hard to find something that doesn't work with that bullet. I haven't tried anything heaver yet.
 
When you say you tried all those different brands of bullets, which ones did you try from each?

Were they all one weight, or several weights from each company?

Did you only use one type and/or brand of powder, one brand primer, one seating depth?

How well did you clean between swapping powder, bullets, or loads, or did you?

Not looking to be a nit picker, but I find it pretty hard to fathom not finding SOMETHING that will shoot from the listed brands, if you did a bit of tinkering with a few powders and such. Heck even a seating depth change can sometimes mean an inch worth of group.

Also some of the mentioned bullets have pretty soft jackets which can and do at time foul a barrel pretty quick. Speaking of which fouling can easily be the, or one of the reason as well.

Just have to have a bit more info than what you posted. Your twist isn't anything out of the norm and should shoot most any 85 and up grain bullet pretty decent. It might like one better than the others but you should easily be able to get something to shoot.
 
I've worked up a few 243 rounds for the 700. What powders do you have and what bullets do you have. I'm sure we can come up with something your gun would like. Mine loves just about everything I put in it, but the 85gr gameking seems to be the best, 70gr SMK is a close second and 95gr SMK just below that(at least in mine).
 
It's unlikely your twist rate is a problem.

Random thoughts; Some rifles are picky about what they will shoot and some won't shoot at all. Some do very good after a bit of bedding work, a better scope or tightening the rings/mounts and action screws, etc. Load develpment counts too, properly developed reloads are done step by step, not by jumping from one fixed combo to another in a game of chance. AND, nothing will shoot very precisely without good shooting technique over a solid bench and stable rests.
 
When you say you tried all those different brands of bullets, which ones did you try from each?

I have tried Nosler 95 gr. CT's and 90 gr. BT's, Sierra 85 gr. GK's, Berger 95 gr. VLD's, Hornady 95 gr. SST's and Speer 85 gr. Spitzer BT's. Most I could get to group around 3 inches if I allowed the barrel to cool to the point I could hold it with my hand.


Were they all one weight, or several weights from each company?

All were under 100 grs. When I called Remington about the problem I've been having with this gun they told me I should be using 100 and 105 gr. bullets with a 9 1/4 twist.

Did you only use one type and/or brand of powder, one brand primer, one seating depth?

I have tried Varget, IMR 4350, H4831SC and IMR4895.

How well did you clean between swapping powder, bullets, or loads, or did you?
I clean my gun after each trip to the range. I normally only try one load group per session (this would consist of 10 rounds of each powder weight, starting at close to the recommended beginning load for each powder increasing in 1/2 gr. increments until I either reach the max recommended load or I notice excessive signs of pressure). I normally put 3 rounds down the barrel before I start testing a new load to fowl the barrel. I do not clean the gun at the range once I begin testing a new load.

Not looking to be a nit picker, but I find it pretty hard to fathom not finding SOMETHING that will shoot from the listed brands, if you did a bit of tinkering with a few powders and such. Heck even a seating depth change can sometimes mean an inch worth of group.

Not sure a seating depth change would make a whole lot of difference in this gun. There is no way any .243 bullet is going to come close to the lands. On all loads for this gun I have marked a sample bullet at .243 from the bottom and this is the depth I seat the bullets. I am seriously thinking about still sending this gun back to Remington and at least have them look at it. I agree is should shoot 85 and 95 gr. bullets a lot better than what it does.

Also some of the mentioned bullets have pretty soft jackets which can and do at time foul a barrel pretty quick. Speaking of which fouling can easily be the, or one of the reason as well.

I don't see a lot of copper when I clean the barrel but I suppose that could have something to do with shots 4 and 5.

Just have to have a bit more info than what you posted. Your twist isn't anything out of the norm and should shoot most any 85 and up grain bullet pretty decent. It might like one better than the others but you should easily be able to get something to shoot.

I haven't given up yet, but getting pretty discouraged. The fellow that shot the 1" group with Winchester 100 gr Power Points was an ex-Army/LE sniper. He let the barrel cool for about 3 minutes between shots and shots 4 & 5 were still away from the group. I asked him to shoot a 5-shot group so I could send the target to Remington in case he had the same problem I was having. Here is the target he shot.

243_Win_100grPP.jpg
 
I've worked up a few 243 rounds for the 700. What powders do you have and what bullets do you have. I'm sure we can come up with something your gun would like. Mine loves just about everything I put in it, but the 85gr gameking seems to be the best, 70gr SMK is a close second and 95gr SMK just below that(at least in mine).

Thanks! I have Varget, IMR 4350, H4831SC, IMR4895, IMR4064 and RL22. The best I've seen out of this gun so far are the Winchester commercial loads with 100gr. Power Points. I am going to pick up some heavier bullets and see if that will help.
 
Have you had the barrel out of the stock yet?

No, I haven't but not sure about the original owner. I'm beginning to understand why I got such a great deal on this rifle. :rolleyes: I was told that it would do no good to bed the stock as the accuracy of these guns comes from pressure of the stock on the barrel and that taking the stock off can change POI. Should I try removing the barrel out of the stock?
 
My best accuracy, with 100gr, have been with the plain ole' remington core loct (sp), over RL22. It will shoot about 1.25",1.50", at 200yd, and about 3/4", at 100, if I do my part. I've taken about 25 deer with this combo.

My 700ADL, from about 1987,hates bullets under 95gr for some reason.... I had some of the old speer (I think),105gr, and it shot them ok, tho I could never work up a load as good as the Remington 100gr.
 
You don't think a 2" group will kill a deer at 100 yds.
If your gun will group 1/2" at 100 yds--when you see that deer you may not be able to hold that gun steady enuf to group 2".
You are the" i never get shakey type" right ?
 
I only know what I've been told & have forgotten some of that.

A Remington has 2 tuning (for like of a better ward)nubs & is tuned by torque. You adjust your reverberation(not sure that is the right word) by how much torque its cranked down to.

I would take it out of the stock & make sure those nubs weren't sanded off or have crap pinched under it. Get you a torque wrench & ether start looking for that sweet spot or call Remington back.
 
You don't think a 2" group will kill a deer at 100 yds.
If your gun will group 1/2" at 100 yds--when you see that deer you may not be able to hold that gun steady enuf to group 2".
You are the" i never get shakey type" right ?

I've seen a few things that made me shake, but I've been hunting for over 50 years so I don't tend to do a lot of shaking when it comes to seeing a deer. I'm at the age now that shooting a deer doesn't really excite me that much, it's more about the camaraderie that keeps me going hunting than the killing of the deer. I'm not saying I don't shoot them, just saying that my priorities have changed over the years. Just figure if I'm going to go through all the effort to reload for this gun that it should at least start off shooting close to an inch at 100 yds. I don't expect 5 under a dime, just don't like it when I get 4 and 5" fliers.
 
I only know what I've been told & have forgotten some of that.

A Remington has 2 tuning (for like of a better ward)nubs & is tuned by torque. You adjust your reverberation(not sure that is the right word) by how much torque its cranked down to.

I would take it out of the stock & make sure those nubs weren't sanded off or have crap pinched under it. Get you a torque wrench & ether start looking for that sweet spot or call Remington back.

Sounds like pretty good advice to me. Thanks!
 
You been hunting over 50 years
60 years here.
Now I spend my time target shooting--so I have joined that club.
It is easier on my bod than running around the woods--I might have another heart attack.
Have fun
I had a 6mm Rem 700 took many deer with 100
gr. factory rds.
PIcked up a 243 Savage Edge this year-- I needed another cal. to reload-LOL
It is avery accurate rifle with a scope
H
 
Last edited:
Just a side note (ok, story) to take however you want: (entertainment?)

Never owned a Rem. 700. My first deer rifle was a iddy bitty Rem. Mohawk 600 carbine in .243. ($108 brand new) My first 20 reloads in this life was for that gun, using a $25 Lee Target Loader.:) Recipe was Winchester 760 ball powder behind Speer 105 grain bullets. Don't recall the amount of powder, but it was the stock load using the little dipper that came with the Lee Loader. Beginners luck (or most likely a work up by Lee, that resulted in the included dipper and load data for their Target Loader), or whatever, the first 5 rounds I shot went into the same hole at 100 yards. Didn't measure it, but I couldn't fit my pointer finger in it, as I remember.

I had a Rockchucker ordered at the time, and so I never loaded any more rounds like that, nor any more using the little Lee Loader. For the RCBS press, somebody talked me into shooting 100gr. Sierras in front of IMR 4350. I probably shot rocks with the 15 rounds left from the original 760 loaded 20. ;) I've never shot a group that perfect since...least not with a hunter rifle of any kind. I stuck with the IMR 4350 behind 100 boat tails for 40 years.....

What's funny is this: I still have the slightly used .243 Lee Target Loader....the nearly full can of Winchester 760, and a half dozen of the Speer 105 grain bullets from the original box. I haven't a clue why I never tried that load in my Rock Chucker......maybe I should.:D
 
I have tried Nosler 95 gr. CT's and 90 gr. BT's, Sierra 85 gr. GK's, Berger 95 gr. VLD's, Hornady 95 gr. SST's and Speer 85 gr. Spitzer BT's. Most I could get to group around 3 inches if I allowed the barrel to cool to the point I could hold it with my hand.

I haven't got a clue on why at least ONE of those didn't get you something. But such is the nature of handloading.

All were under 100 grs. When I called Remington about the problem I've been having with this gun they told me I should be using 100 and 105 gr. bullets with a 9 1/4 twist.

They are pretty much spot on for that particular twist rate, but you shold still be able to shoot the lighter ones to some degree of good accuracy.

I have tried Varget, IMR 4350, H4831SC and IMR4895.

Any or all of these should be fine with the bullets you listed. While not my top choices they have worked great for lots of other folks. My two powders have for the most part been IMR-3031 for anything 85grs and lighter, and H-4350 for anything 90grs and heavier. But like ice cream, everyone has their favorite flavors. The latest loads I worked up were for my grandsons .243 and I used some of the newer Hybrid 100V. I have to say that this was one of the very few instances that the provided data coincided to within about 50fps all the way through the listed loads. IT shoots great in his rifle.

I clean my gun after each trip to the range. I normally only try one load group per session (this would consist of 10 rounds of each powder weight, starting at close to the recommended beginning load for each powder increasing in 1/2 gr. increments until I either reach the max recommended load or I notice excessive signs of pressure). I normally put 3 rounds down the barrel before I start testing a new load to fowl the barrel. I do not clean the gun at the range once I begin testing a new load.

When I work up a load, no matter the caliber, I usually try and clean the barrel about every 10 - 20 rounds max, but usually after about every 5 it gets a swabbing with patches, at the very least. It helps to cool the barrel and keep the fouling at a minimum. Some bullets, like I mentioned, just seem to lay the copper down a bit more than others. It is nothing detrimental, but once it builds up, it simply takes longer to scrub out. It's just easier for me to stay on top of it, than have to work on it longer when I am ready for a "cold drink".

Not sure a seating depth change would make a whole lot of difference in this gun. There is no way any .243 bullet is going to come close to the lands. On all loads for this gun I have marked a sample bullet at .243 from the bottom and this is the depth I seat the bullets. I am seriously thinking about still sending this gun back to Remington and at least have them look at it. I agree is should shoot 85 and 95 gr. bullets a lot better than what it does.

Just for kicks, set up your seater so that it is good and snug down on top of one of the Winchester loads. Then seat one of any other bullets you have tried in an unprimed case, and measure the difference between it and what you had tried previously. I realize that the profiles will be different, due to the differences in weight, but the seater should contact about the same diameter of the ogive on each bullet, and that will be somewhere close, but not exact. It might give you another tool to try out with your future loads. I have found this before, several times, where a factory load shot well, so I matched the base to ogive dimensions, and hit really close to the same groups with my loads.

I don't see a lot of copper when I clean the barrel but I suppose that could have something to do with shots 4 and 5.

I haven't given up yet, but getting pretty discouraged. The fellow that shot the 1" group with Winchester 100 gr Power Points was an ex-Army/LE sniper. He let the barrel cool for about 3 minutes between shots and shots 4 & 5 were still away from the group. I asked him to shoot a 5-shot group so I could send the target to Remington in case he had the same problem I was having. Here is the target he shot.


In reading through this and seeing the target, I am starting to see a trend I have found with all of my Remington rifles. While I realize they build the rifle and know how to build them, I have had every one of my rifles exhibit similar trends over the years. They shot great for a while then slowly spread out. I highly suggest checking the action screws, as well as sanding that infernal hump down in the front of the stock. Remove the barreled action from the stock. Look closely at the area around the action and recoil lug. If you see any particular area or one particular spot, that shows signs of pressure in one spot over another like an uneven pressure point then you have probably found your issue. Usually this is a blackened spot, or a real shiny spot on one side or in one particular area. It might be as simple as removing the pressure hump or taking a dremmel tool or wood chisel and squaring the lug area, but something is binding and causing the shots to stray. If simply checking the torque use one of the clicker type IN/LB torque wrenches. Here is a link that has some great info on just this,
Torque Specs for Gunsmiths

The thing about removing the pressure hump is that it is a quick and easy deal. Simply roll some emery cloth around a wood dowel and sand it down. If this doesn't help you can always put one back in using cut layers of a business card soaked with epoxy. Simply measure what you have before you remove it and you know how much will be needed if you put it back in. Personally I have removed all of mine and they shot like a different rifle when done. They were way more consistent and tightly grouped a wider range of load combinations.

While I cannot guarantee any of the above will absolutely do the job, I feel that some if not all of it is contributing to your grouping issue. I would definitely look at the internal area of the stock for looseness or something not sitting right, and torque the screws at the very minimum. One thing when you start to torque is to slightly snug the screws by had then bump the butt on the floor so as to settle the action in the stock. Nothing hard just to simply settle things before the final torque. This helps the recoil lug settle in place against the stop in the stock.

Good luck and hope some of this helps. I know how frustrating it can be to want something and have one simple little thing throwing rocks in the cogs.
 
Parker, I've got a IMR 4064 load that runs pretty accurate. I had an old load book in my truck(I'm at work right now) and 70gr smk on top of 38.5 of the IMR4064 was a really accurate load. I know that's not really a heavy enough for a deer but it is accurate. I'll find my load data for heavier stuff and post it up for you tonight.
 
I know that's not really a heavy enough for a deer but it is accurate.
I have do some penetration test with a 65gr V-Max that I slowed way down to where Hornady said it needed to be to hold together & I have no doubt it would work for deer(never tried it on flash).

That 4064 works great with a 65gr pill. None from them from min-max shot over 1" & there was a big ol sweet spot in the middle that shot .457" @ 41.5gr.

Blue Dot is what I used to slow them down. I believe it is below 2500 FPS which 15gr of BD should be about right.
 
Wow, that is slow. I believe that 70gr runs right about 2850 fps(I need to look as I'm getting old and my memory fails me sometimes), and some of the factory stuff at 55g I've seen run around 4000 fps. Honestly the 85 gameking is mines favorite bullet. They easily shoot under 1" at 200y. Generally though when any of my guns shoot bad, the first thing I do is go through the optics and mounting because that's where I find the problem almost always.
 
I forgot to even mention optics. That is a good point. Try to tighten the scope up & fire 3 rounds. If it doesn't get any better pull the top off the rings & make sure there is tape in them. If that fells Try the scope on another rifle that you know shoots. If you still haven't found the problem I would suggest going through what I said earlier.

If all that fells check with a smith or send it back.
 
http://www.thehighroad.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=137000&d=1298508781 100gr. Sierragameking with 45.5 grns of IMR7828 is my pet load but you may have some bedding issues with your Remmy, .243's shoot almost anything into 1MOA. I would go back to your most accurate load be it factory or reload and try raising the action up with some shims(I use old credit card strips). Put a strip under the front action screw and one under the rear action screw and tighten them down and shoot a group and see what changes, if the groups improve then you have bedding problems for sure, If not then I would be looking at the barrel or possibly your scope or mounting setup. I always do one adjustment at a time and if I have no result I put it back the way it was.
 
I fail to understand why anyone loads for accuracy in hunting loads. I'll bet I've killed 100 deer with a .243, and the only thing I gave a damn about was that the bullet held together at high velocity. A .243 needs all the velocity it can get, and since it's light you shouldn't be shooting beyond 300 yards since the round doesn't have the kinetic energy to assure a kill at long range.

You should load for terminal performance, period. A 2 MOA group means that at 300 yards your slug will land within 3 inches of your crosshairs. What more do you want?

For my money (and I'm very experienced with the .243), nothing beats the 100 grain Nosler Partition. Most of the deer I killed with a .243 were with NP's. I never once recovered a partition. Not once. The .243 with a high velocity NP is pure deer poison with an exit wound that's damned near fist sized. I always loaded to max velocity even though that was never the most accurate.
 
Just because it's fast doesn't mean it can do the job. I can slow a bullet down & get more penetration with most bullets.

You have more knowledge then me on a 243Win tho because I'm by no means very experienced with it. I do however know I can get a bullet to penetrate better by slowing it down. I don't want it to go all the way through tho. I want it dumping all of its energy in the body cavity. I also wouldn't bother with a gun that shoots 2". My SKS has had the trigger group out of it for over 4 years because it just isn't worth it to through cheap ammo down range. If I didn't care if it got better then 4" I probably just throw knifes while hunting. I used to come close to that with a bow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top