AlexanderA
Member
After reading the text of Feinstein's AWB bill, it appears to me that its effect on the AR, etc., market would be exactly like the effect of the 1986 Hughes Amendment on the machine gun market: stop all new production and drive the prices of existing items through the roof. This is because transfers of grandfathered guns (through FFL's) would be allowed.
It doesn't mention parts, including uppers, barrels, etc. There would be a thriving trade in these, as well as unfinished ("80%") lower receivers. In effect, the Feinstein bill would simply freeze the existing supply of legal lower receivers.
The ban on over-10 magazines would be more absolute, since there's no provision for legal transfers. But since the pre-ban, grandfathered magazines are unmarked, and number in the millions, the enforcement of this would be practically impossible. You couldn't advertise a pre-ban magazine for sale.
No question that this is an atrocious bill. But, in the remote chance that it passes, there are going to be workarounds, as well as winners and losers.
It doesn't mention parts, including uppers, barrels, etc. There would be a thriving trade in these, as well as unfinished ("80%") lower receivers. In effect, the Feinstein bill would simply freeze the existing supply of legal lower receivers.
The ban on over-10 magazines would be more absolute, since there's no provision for legal transfers. But since the pre-ban, grandfathered magazines are unmarked, and number in the millions, the enforcement of this would be practically impossible. You couldn't advertise a pre-ban magazine for sale.
No question that this is an atrocious bill. But, in the remote chance that it passes, there are going to be workarounds, as well as winners and losers.