• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Fiberglass Stock~M1 Garand question....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good thread. Ya'll have about convinced me to go ahead with my idea for a Rack/.308/synthetic project. Gonna wait for my current CMP order to come in first.
SKIP
 
Brother in Arms said:
SMince
is the synth actually lighter than the wood stock??? Alot of times the synthetic is just as heavy or hevier than wood, but it really depends on what it is made of.

Wiegh it some time if you get a chance, im curious, I hadn't taking weight savings into account because of this reason aforesaid mentioned.

Brother in Arms

Mine lost right at 2lbs (give or take a few oz's) with the stock change. The only metal transfer is the clip that holds the top handguard on. Actual weight savings depends on the amount of oil/moisture in your wood stock. I believe the Ramline to be just good old plastic, therefore the savings in price.
 
Regarding the part of this discussion that deals with .308 barrels... I just checked MidwayUSA and the barrels run $300 for a short chambered Wilson barrel which require a gunsmith to install and finish. I just checked Numrich too...

M1 Garand Mil-Spec .308 Barrel
532580.jpg


CNC machined, parkerized steel, 24" long. Features 4-groove rifling and a 1/10 twist rate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Model: U.S. MILITARY M1 GARAND
Item No. 532580
Additional Additional Shipping charge: $1.00
Retail Price: $159.95

BTW, one of the guys on another board I'm on... the subject was T26 builds... he said he got one of the "tanker" kits from Numrich and it's becoming known to be a no-go on overall performance. Considering T26 builds, I've considered it too, but you have to have a smith who knows how to modify the op-rod to the right length and contour so it don't bind in the stock. Also, the op-rod spring is said to be an issue.
 
Stang
does that have a chrome lined barrel? New manufacutred? I take it not an original Navy garand barrel. $160 isnt a bad price, fulton armory has some barrels in the $250 range. Does anyone know someone who knows alot about .308 garand barrels? Also does anyone know if these have the correct gas port diameter? It has to be enlarged if it still has the same sized port for the .30-06

Brother in Arms

Buck
 
Hey Buck, I don't see anything there that'd lead me to believe they're chrome lined, but then most Garand barrels I ever heard of weren't. I may have missed something somewhere, but most chrome lined USGI barrels I heard about were M-16 and that- according to Culver- was part of a quick fix deal while they were having the problem with ball powder being too fast for the gas system. AFAIK, Garands and M-14's never had that problem. I wouldn't worry too much about a chrome lined Garand barrel since, also AFAIK, most M2 ball and 7.62 ball we get now won't be corrosive.

I'd like to know about that gas port diameter too. I don't seem to me like it'd be a problem to open up though... just have to be careful not to open it up too big. I think I'd invest in a Schuster adjustable gas nut too.

As far as the prices of different barrels go, this is kinda like cars and fly fishing... you can spend as much as you want to. I'm sure some folks would like to see us all spend more.:rolleyes:
 
Mustang
thanks for the info, I can find out the gasport DIA for you, I have a freind who did actual some of the actual navy conversions.

I didn't know if they where chromed I kind of doubted it, many of the USGI M14 barrels where chrome lined.

Thanks for the info

Brother in Arms
 
OK, I've left everyone wondering long enough...........

'vert = convertible

as in 1957 Chevrolet convertible.

And now everyone has me thinking about a .308 Garand wrapped in a synthetic stock.
 
ScottsGT said:
Man, that just 'ain't right! Taking the wood off a Garand is like installing a 4 cyl. in a '57 Chevy 'vert.

Well, you're talking about something that would affect performance, not just appearance.

It's more like putting spinner rims on a Model-T, if you ask me...
 
SLCDave said:
Well, you're talking about something that would affect performance, not just appearance.

It's more like putting spinner rims on a Model-T, if you ask me...

Not really. The synthetic stock does add some performance. The wood will swell with humidity, causing the POI to change. That's why the glass bed wood stocks.
 
ScottsGT said:
Not really. The synthetic stock does add some performance. The wood will swell with humidity, causing the POI to change. That's why the glass bed wood stocks.

So then adding a synthetic stock would INCREASE performance, thus blowing your initial analogy all to hell... :)
 
like installing a 4 cyl. in a '57 Chevy 'vert.

Not really. The synthetic stock does add some performance. The wood will swell with humidity, causing the POI to change. That's why the glass bed wood stocks.


So then adding a synthetic stock would INCREASE performance, thus blowing your initial analogy all to hell...


Great point! Guess I never looked at it that way:eek:
But it still 'ain't right .......or is it?:scrutiny: Especially now that I'm thinking of one too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top