First gun or guns -- buy one or multiple?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I work in Littleton too, (at a FFL, Colorado Gun Broker) but live in the opposite direction, Woodland Park. The Triple J Range should be opening soon. Right now only the retail store is open. Located on South Park just off Mineral. Check them out too before you decide.
My thoughts on the other ranges pretty much echo yours. Lots options for classes and ranges around the Metro area.
 
Start slow. You won't love every firearm you buy. If you buy three at once, chances are at least one you won't like. And you have up to three of not liking.

A G19 is a good start. As much as I dislike Glock, it is a good all around firearm to start with. From there you can see what you do and do not like to base your opinion off. And since your primary goal is self defense, plinking on a 22 can come later in my opinion. 9mm is still relatively cheap to practice with.
 
I work in Littleton too, (at a FFL, Colorado Gun Broker) but live in the opposite direction, Woodland Park. The Triple J Range should be opening soon. Right now only the retail store is open. Located on South Park just off Mineral. Check them out too before you decide.
My thoughts on the other ranges pretty much echo yours. Lots options for classes and ranges around the Metro area.
Dang!
You drive from Woodland Park?
That's a long way.
I'm thinking of quitting my job in Boulder and it's only 35 miles.
That FFL shop is close. I may stop by.
I'll PM you before hand.

Never heard of Triple J Range.
I'll check it out.
thanks
 
As I said earlier, I'm new to guns.
Recently, I took a pistol class offered by a range and have shot only 22 pistols in couple of ranges few times.
I really liked how the M&P 22LR felt in my hands and I was surprised to the first 10 shots I ever fired were all in the first circle of the target.

Sounds like your shooting experience has already proven to be fruitful. You’ve identified a pistol that felt right in the hand and that you shot well. It’s not always this easy and if I were you I would start by renting a centerfire S&W M&P, preferably in 9mm as it’s a great self defense round and is very affordable to shoot, which will allow one to practice a lot more. If you shoot that well, I would say you need to decide what model to get.

I’ve learned that my shooting proficiency suffers when I don’t stay active in practicing. Not that it drops off severely but that my groups open a little and I get slower on the target. There is no substitution to practice on a schedule.

One thing to make sure is that when you decide on a pistol, make sure you know the basics of clearing it, taking it down and putting it back together for cleaning in a safe matter. An unchecked chamber for a loaded round during a lapse in judgement when cleaning a firearm happens more than it should. Always, check the chamber before taking down and cleaning a firearm. And always clear the work area of any ammunition.

Glad that you are taking your families safety seriously. And get yourself a good handgun safe with quick access. I just bought a nice nightstand safe from my Costco for $80. It is a programmable 4 digit code or a RFID chip access that is very quick to access my always chambered firearm for when trouble arises. But this keeps my young kids safe from their limited judgement and naivety.

I would recommend that when you get comfortable with your firearm, and you can handle and take it down in a safe matter, that you spend time doing so with your kids and wife. Take the mystery and intrigue out of their minds about the firearm by letting them handle it unloaded and safely. Show them how to handle it, how to treat it like it’s always loaded and for them to not ever touch it unless you are there with them. I’ve done this with all my kids and I tell them they can see and handle any of my guns whenever they want, they just have to ask and I’ll sit down with them and do it safely.

Glad to have you with us, and I hope that you find all the resources you need here to make a good decision on a first firearm.
 
I'm only thinking about semi-automatic so revolvers are out for 1st gun.
I may try them later on.
On top of that, I'm leaning towards getting one with external safety so that pretty much excludes Glock.

And that’s why you should start with a quality.22lr. It will keep you from developing a flinch. It will help you with learning muscle memory for safety and slide release mechanism. If you get a good used one first it will always be worth what you paid for it. This is important when you trade up. Plus you will shoot it more because it’s cheaper to feed.
 
[QUOTE="Mystery123”]
On top of that, I'm leaning towards getting one with external safety so that pretty much excludes Glock.[/QUOTE]

In that case... be sure you try the s&w m&p that is available with or without a thumb safety... if you get one with a safety once you confidence/experience grows you can delete the safety if you with without changing guns with just a phone call to s&w customer service for some free safety delete plugs... I have done this.
Also the m&p is available in 4 different sizes with identical controls so you could have the option of a big one and a little one for different uses with the same magazines and muscle memory for both
 
While the Glock 19 seems to be the universal choice, I'm not wild about polymer or striker-fired pistols or guns with no external safety device.
And, If you won't be packing it around all day, the slight increase in weight really is of no importance.
Consider a CZ-75 or a Sig P226. Both are great choices, with a double action trigger for the first shot, and either a de-cocker safety or a thumb safety.
Both have been well-liked in police and military service.
 
Like others have said, try before you buy, get one at first.

Invest in lessons if you can.

Get a bigger safe ... you will need it :)
 
I’m also going to break with the conventional advice given here and say that I have and continue to find rimfire extremely boring. I’ve sold every 22lr handgun I’ve ever owned, and aside from a pinned S&W 17, I doubt I’ll ever own another.

Cost of ammo is a great incentive to learn good technique fast. A 38 revolver or a 9mm pistol is a perfectly fine place to start.
 
The only advice I can give is to 'shake hands' with as many different makes and models as you can. Bonus points if you try it out before making a purchase. You may find a weapon that suits you perfectly that wasn't mentioned in this thread. If it can also accept a .22 conversion kit even better. You still have only one gun, but with options. Good luck and welcome.
 
I’m also going to break with the conventional advice given here and say that I have and continue to find rimfire extremely boring. I’ve sold every 22lr handgun I’ve ever owned, and aside from a pinned S&W 17, I doubt I’ll ever own another.

Cost of ammo is a great incentive to learn good technique fast. A 38 revolver or a 9mm pistol is a perfectly fine place to start.


+1

Totally agree on .22lr handguns. There are 2 in my safe and neither belongs to me. 1 is my wife's and 1 is my 9 year olds. I never shoot them.
 
On top of that, I'm leaning towards getting one with external safety so that pretty much excludes Glock.
A lot of good suggestions have already been given in this thread, so I'm just going to focus on this one. It's common for people who are new to guns to want an external safety, I think mostly because of the word "safety". They, (possibly you?) have the impression that the gun is automatically "safer" if it has a safety. It can be in some ways, but here's the kicker. It's only safer if the safety is actually used religiously. If it's not, it's more dangerous than a gun that was designed without a manual safety to start with. It's easy for newer (and sometimes not so new) shooters to forget to use that safety every single time the gun come on and off the target. I see it all the time as a concealed carry instructor. I'm not necessarily trying to talk you out of it but just keep in mind that a gun with a manual safety requires arguably more training and is potentially more dangerous than one without.
 
+1. If you must shoot in a life or death situation and forgot to disengage the safety, bad news. As already mentioned, M&P comes with/without external safety and Model 2.0 produced good accuracy.

BTW, here are some accuracy of different pistols for your reference - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...s-and-discussions.778197/page-9#post-10940688

Nighthawk Custom Hi-Power (25 yards) 0.74" to 1.71" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/4/11/tested-nighthawk-custom-hi-power/

EAA Witness Elite 1911 (25 yards) 0.82" to 1.41" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/5/5/tested-eaa-witness-elite-1911-polymer-pistol/

Lipsey's Vickers Tactical Glock 17 (25 yards) 1.00" to 1.80" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/3/23/tested-lipsey-s-vickers-tactical-glock-17/

Ruger PC carbine (50 yards) 1.13" to 1.42" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2018/1/2/tested-ruger-s-pc-carbine-and-security-9-pistol/

Sig P320 X-Five/VTAC (25 yards) 1.14" to 1.97" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2018/8/10/tested-sig-sauer-p320-x-series-pistols/

S&W M&P9 M2.0 Compact (25 yards) 1.22" to 3.64" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/11/30/tested-smith-wesson-mp9-m20-compact-pistol/

Remington R1 M1911 (25 yards) 1.24" to 2.99" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2011/1/13/the-remington-r1-m1911/

KRISS Vector Gen II SDP 9 (25 yards) 1.33" to 1.53" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2016/7/19/tested-kriss-usa-vector-gen-ii-sdp-9-mm-pistol/

S&W M&P9 M2.0 (25 yards) 1.33" to 2.36" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/5/22/tested-smith-wessons-mp-m20-pistol/

Sig P225 (25 yards) 1.38" to 2.43" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2018/6/22/tested-sig-sauer-p225-a1-nitron-compact-pistol/

Ruger SR1911 Target (25 yards) 1.46" to 3.23" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/1/9/tested-ruger-sr1911-target-pistol/

Sig P226 Legion Series (25 yards) 1.58" to 2.36" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2016/4/15/tested-sig-sauer-legion-series-p226-pistol/

Ruger Mark IV 22/45 Lite (25 yards) 1.82" to 2.00" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/3/3/tested-ruger-mark-iv-2245-lite-pistol/

FN 509 (25 yards) 1.88" to 2.06" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/6/26/tested-the-fn-509-pistol/

H&K VP9SK (25 yards) 1.97" to 2.23" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2018/1/5/tested-heckler-koch-s-vp9sk-pistol/

Beretta APX (25 yards) 2.30" to 2.47" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/7/25/tested-beretta-s-apx-pistol/

CZ P-10 C (25 yards) 2.40" to 3.02" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/10/6/tested-cz-p-10-c-pistol/

Kimber Camp Guard 10mm (25 yards) 2.41" to 2.69" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2018/1/11/tested-kimber-camp-guard-10-pistol/

Springfield XDM 4.5" OSP (25 yards) 2.46" to 2.80" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/3/21/tested-springfield-xdm-45-osp-9-mm-pistol/

Ruger American (25 yards) 2.48" to 2.89" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2015/12/29/tested-ruger-american-pistol/

PSA 1911 Stainless Two-Tone (25 yards) 2.51" to 2.89" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/ar...to-state-armory-1911-two-tone-premium-pistol/

Walther PPQ M2 Q4 Tac (25 yards) 2.53" to 2.76" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2018/1/19/tested-walther-ppq-m2-q4-tac-9-mm-pistol/

Ruger Security 9 (25 yards) 2.63" to 3.15" - https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2018/1/2/tested-ruger-s-pc-carbine-and-security-9-pistol/

More pistol reviews and 25 yard groups at link.
 
I’m also going to break with the conventional advice given here and say that I have and continue to find rimfire extremely boring. I’ve sold every 22lr handgun I’ve ever owned, and aside from a pinned S&W 17, I doubt I’ll ever own another.

Cost of ammo is a great incentive to learn good technique fast. A 38 revolver or a 9mm pistol is a perfectly fine place to start.

I learned to shoot well by punching targets in an indoor range limited to .22 RF. It served me very well. Habits became ingrained and the transition to heavier recoiling center fire pistols (and rifles) was very easy.
The foundation fundamentals are all about sight alignment, target alignment, and trigger control, regardless of what skills are learned afterward.
A .22 rim fire pistol allows you to learn that without also having to cope with heavy recoil and greater expense. It is interesting that the police and military have often started new recruit training with .22 rimfire pistols as well.

An analogy might be that it is easier to learn to drive with a small car with an automatic transmission, rather than with a 4X4 pickup with a stick shift manual transmission.

I have owned and shot many rounds of center fire, and reload for same for .45ACP, .45 Colt, .357 magnum, and .44 Magnum.
However I have never ceased to enjoy plinking with a .22 revolver or pistol.

However, to each his own.
 
Last edited:
Colorado has some quirky gun laws, so check with what you are allowed to have as far as gun models, magazine capacity, etc.

Colorado State Preemption Statute 29-11.7-101. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly hereby finds that: (a) Section 3 of article II of the state constitution, the article referred to as the state bill of rights, declares that all persons have certain inalienable rights, which include the right to defend their lives and liberties; (b) Section 13 of article II of the state constitution protects the fundamental right of a person to keep and bear arms and implements section 3 of article II of the state constitution; (c) The general assembly recognizes a duty to protect and defend the fundamental civil rights set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection (1); (d) There exists a widespread inconsistency among jurisdictions within the state with regard to firearms regulations; (e) This inconsistency among local government laws regulating lawful firearm possession and ownership has extraterritorial impact on state citizens and the general public by subjecting them to criminal and civil penalties in some jurisdictions for conduct wholly lawful in other jurisdictions; (f) Inconsistency among local governments of laws regulating the possession and ownership of firearms results in persons being treated differently under the law solely on the basis of where they reside, and a person's residence in a particular county or city or city and county is not a rational classification when it is the basis for denial of equal treatment under the law; (g) This inconsistency places citizens in the position of not knowing when they may be violating the local laws and therefore being unable to avoid violating the law and becoming subject to criminal and other penalties. (2) Based on the findings specified in subsection (1) of this section, the general assembly concludes that: (a) The regulation of firearms is a matter of statewide concern; (b) It is necessary to provide statewide laws concerning the possession and ownership of a firearm to ensure that law-abiding persons are not unfairly placed in the position of unknowingly committing crimes involving firearms.
 
If you like the M&P 22, it mates up nicely to the M&P 9 Compact Version 2.0

https://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/mp-22-compact

https://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/mp-9-m20-36-compact

I have not heard anything bad about either, and if you watch, S&W often has sales and promotions. They are very good firearms.

Personally, I'm a Glock guy, but if I were to do it all over again, sticking with striker fire platforms, the Walther PPQ, S&W M&P 2.0, and the Xdm/XD Mod 2 lines of firearms are ALL very good.
 
Last edited:
Start slow. You won't love every firearm you buy. If you buy three at once, chances are at least one you won't like. And you have up to three of not liking.

A G19 is a good start. As much as I dislike Glock, it is a good all around firearm to start with. From there you can see what you do and do not like to base your opinion off. And since your primary goal is self defense, plinking on a 22 can come later in my opinion. 9mm is still relatively cheap to practice with.

I agree that 9MM is cheap and plentiful and a great centerfire to start with, but when there is a choice, it fails to beat a good .22LR for lots of good solid fundamentals and practice, especially for a new shooter.
 
Something in 9mm, I was never a fan of this caliber but for a newb and first gun it would be silly to buy another caliber especially rimfire.

A Shield9 has really changed my attitude about the 9mm and CC in general.
 
Thank you all for information and suggestions.
I'll keep them in mind when buying and when practicing.
Most common ones like trying different guns is something I'll definitely do.
Indoor ranges around here allow swapping handgun during the same rental session.

I checked few guns at the shop today from Glock, Smith & Wesson, Sig, HK and few others I can't remember.
I tried them with holsters from outside and even the compacts felt huge.
I think it'll be hard and uncomfortable concealing a Glock 19 or M&P of that size inside the waist.

BTW, those of you who have this size handgun (G19, M&P 2.0 compact), how much is above the waist and how much is under it?
Could you post pictures of inside or outside waist conceal holsters please?
How much are we hiding under the waist? Belt is 1.5 - 2" so the gun is only 3" below the waist, right?

In that case... be sure you try the s&w m&p that is available with or without a thumb safety... if you get one with a safety once you confidence/experience grows you can delete the safety if you with without changing guns with just a phone call to s&w customer service for some free safety delete plugs... I have done this.
Also the m&p is available in 4 different sizes with identical controls so you could have the option of a big one and a little one for different uses with the same magazines and muscle memory for both
Thanks for that info.
I didn't know safety can be removed on M&P. That adds one more vote on my option. :)

A lot of good suggestions have already been given in this thread, so I'm just going to focus on this one. It's common for people who are new to guns to want an external safety, I think mostly because of the word "safety". They, (possibly you?) have the impression that the gun is automatically "safer" if it has a safety. It can be in some ways, but here's the kicker. It's only safer if the safety is actually used religiously. If it's not, it's more dangerous than a gun that was designed without a manual safety to start with. It's easy for newer (and sometimes not so new) shooters to forget to use that safety every single time the gun come on and off the target. I see it all the time as a concealed carry instructor. I'm not necessarily trying to talk you out of it but just keep in mind that a gun with a manual safety requires arguably more training and is potentially more dangerous than one without.
Yes, thanks for the warning.
I realized that. I'll still treat the gun as if it doesn't have external safety.
That's extra comfort in case something accidental happens.
I'll make sure to include external safety during practice.

If you like the M&P 22, it mates up nicely to the M&P 9 Compact Version 2.0
https://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/mp-22-compact
https://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/mp-9-m20-36-compact
...
I've been comparing those two M&P compacts for weeks now and still can't decide between 3.6" vs 4.0" models.
Both are same height and capacity but the 4.0" is .5" longer.

The more I think about my situation, I probably will get a M&P 4.0" compact for home and range and for ccw, I'll get a single stack much smaller gun later.

Again, thank you all for actively engaging in this thread.
 
Physical build, wardrobe and daily activities will greatly affect what concealed holster will work best for you... as much as the gun itself I’d wager. There a sub forum here where you could post you height, weight, and activities to get some good suggestions on holsters.

Here’s one I made this afternoon for my m&p compact
1D0625E9-7827-4EF9-A971-390C10009D9B.jpeg

You are wondering about how high above the belt... if you carry inside the waistband be sure the grip is high enough above the belt that you fingers can wrap all the way around ( under) to get a good ‘combat grip’
... not like this —> 5997CCA4-BEEF-4B56-805D-CEF2581E6C61.jpeg Which only allows for a 2 fingered draw and a toss of the gun after it clears to get a good grip
 
Last edited:
Thank you Trunk Monkey and bluejeans for the pictures.
Doesn't look too bad/big in the pictures.
Looks like third of trigger guard is above the belt and tip of the gun below the trigger guard is below the belt.
Iwb does look dangerous compared to owb, breaks one of the four rules by pointing barrel right into the thigh. :eek:
 
Last edited:
Since you've already had initial training with a .22, I'd suggest opting for a centerfire.
9mm ammo right now is very affordable and certainly suitable for your needs but I'd suggest trying out .45ACP as well as revolvers---why? because one of those might suit you better--only you can decide that for yourself.
Another consideration:
If you have magazine restrictions in your state, there is no point in dealing with the bulk of a double stack.
 
Everyone is different. I am middle-aged and still shoot my 22's more than any other handguns. They're good for practice imho, the ammo being cheap and virtually without recoil.

My first "real" handgun was a mid-sized 4" 357 revolver. That's still my preferred HD handgun.

I'm not willing to carry anything very large.
 
I agree that 9MM is cheap and plentiful and a great centerfire to start with, but when there is a choice, it fails to beat a good .22LR for lots of good solid fundamentals and practice, especially for a new shooter.

If the primary concern for a first firearm is right away defense, it makes no sense to start with a 22 to "learn the fundamentals." When budget is tight for firearms, ammo, holsters, etc you might as well start with a good jack of all trade firearm. I started with a .40. Looking back, I wish I started on the same platform just in 9mm.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top