kingpin008 said:What you did was textbook brandishing.
Sec. 9.04. THREATS AS JUSTIFIABLE FORCE. The threat of force is justified when the use of force is justified by this chapter. For purposes of this section, a threat to cause death or serious bodily injury by the production of a weapon or otherwise, as long as the actor's purpose is limited to creating an apprehension that he will use deadly force if necessary, does not constitute the use of deadly force.
A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly:displays a firearm or other deadly weapon in a public place in a manner calculated to alarm
What you did was textbook brandishing.
The first one to call is the complainant and will have the upper hand in terms of credibility.Posted by rhodco: Having been in a similar position myself, I don't think there is anything to be gained by calling police. They don't know who the good guy or bad guy is in this matter. With no physical evidence, it's just your word against his/theirs.
It may also be justified.And by the way, letting someone see it on purpose is brandishing. Pointing it at someone is actually an assault in the state or georgia.
That's why you want to be the first to call. The assailant describes your gun; the police already know what kind it is; you have described the assailant's actions in advance. You are not on the defensive at that point.If he can describe what your gun looks like, the cops have you. It then becomes your burden to prove it was justified.
...I don't know what he was saying part English part Spanish one part I did understand was the you think your better than me and yes he was coming at me eye to eye contact. No mistaking that. And the low speeds part well if you know el paso piedres isn't exactly a low speed street I would have been crossing blind. And when I said barrel out I mean I took aim. No brandishing just aim and he was maybe 4 ft from the window. This is why I posted this. Would y'all consider this justified? Didn't call the cops maybe I should of.
_